Re: Why not model actual train consists? (UNCLASSIFIED)
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Caveats: NONE Thanks, Richard. When I first started seriously reining in my expectations (yeah, Horseshoe Curve was long off that list), I went from wanting to model the entire Monongahela Division from Pittsburgh to Brownsville (~50 miles)...."selectively compressed"....then understanding what that entailed (approximately 50 freight trains and >10 passenger trains), to wanting to model just the Mon from Port Perry south to West Elizabeth (now down to ~30 freight trains and 2 passenger trains), still with massive selective compression, through several more iterations...to last-go-round < 3 miles of the Mon at Clairton, PA, with USS Clairton, and a half dozen industries around it, plus an interchange with Union RR and the P&WV, and guess what...I STILL need over 500 cars, dozens of engines, and the ability to makes up around twenty through drag freights, transfers, locals and local switching, just to make those 3 miles work...AND look right doing it. Trains that move through the scene and never stop...those that drop off blocks and pick up and leave...locals that do local switching and leave, and a local switcher. NO spaghetti bowls, once-thru scenery laid out like the real thing, none of that cramped scenery that I liked when I was a little guy, and the ability to make and break consists in invisible staging. Even that fills most of an entire 2-car garage. I don't know how others have the resources to do larger "operations", but I have to give them credit. It is beyond me, and I still have hundreds of freight cars to build....right. Elden Gatwood
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Richard Hendrickson Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 2:06 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: Re: [STMFC] Why not model actual train consists? (UNCLASSIFIED) On May 23, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Gatwood, Elden SAW wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIEDWell said, Elden. My thinking exactly. To model prototypical main line operations realistically requires a hell of a lot of real estate. I' don't know of any small (e.g., bedroom-sized) layouts where the potential for operations is at all satisfying, with the exception of of a couple of room-sized or bookshelf-type layouts representing switching in a particular city, or part of a city (Keith Jordan's bookshelf switching layout representing a part of Los Angeles comes immediately to mind). Richard Hendrickson [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE
|
|