Re: Why not model actual train consists?
Schuyler Larrabee
Just now (8:43 EDT) seeing this and know that there is a lengthy thread
attached to this, but this is something I've wanted to do for years. I have been seeking an ERIE consist, preferably EB, preferably pulled by a ERIE Berkshire (not to ask too terribly much) but as yet, I have had no luck. SGL From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Betz Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 10:52 AM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] Why not model actual train consists? Hi, We keep re-visiting the topic of freight car distribution ... and discussing how to represent the freight cars for a point in time or an "era" ... and then, presumably, adjusting the mix of freight cars on our layouts ... So I'm prompted to ask "Why not model actual trains?" As in find a train sheet you like and go for it - with selective compression - of course. And then extend it to several trains. Is anyone out there doing this? Thinking seriously about it? Tried it and found they couldn't field enough models to fill the bill (how close did you get)? Selectively compress out the models you don't have as a first cut? No, substitutions allowed (same number series but different number)? One box car - from the correct era - is just as good as the next? You could even preserve the order of the cars in the train even if you aren't modelling all of them. And 'just' adjust the waybills for the layout? - Jim Why Not ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17570) http://www.pctools.com <http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> ======= ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17570) http://www.pctools.com/ =======
|
|