Re: The wheels on the bus go round and round, was Re: Revell Flatcar
Bill Daniels <billinsf@...>
Or, more likely, you aren't old enough to remember it, Tim...
Bill Daniels
San Francisco, CA
________________________________
From: "timboconnor@..." <timboconnor@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [STMFC] The wheels on the bus go round and round, was Re: Revell Flatcar
Bruce, I know that's true, but how common was 156lb rail on the PRR, really? I grew up in PRR territory and none
of the rail I ever saw was 156lb. Of course I didn't go out on the Middle Division, maybe that's where they used it...
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce F. Smith" smithbf@...>
What is wrong with code 100? It is the closest we have for PRR's 156 lbs mainline rail! It all depends on what you are modeling...
Bruce F. Smith
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Bill Daniels
San Francisco, CA
________________________________
From: "timboconnor@..." <timboconnor@...>
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [STMFC] The wheels on the bus go round and round, was Re: Revell Flatcar
Bruce, I know that's true, but how common was 156lb rail on the PRR, really? I grew up in PRR territory and none
of the rail I ever saw was 156lb. Of course I didn't go out on the Middle Division, maybe that's where they used it...
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce F. Smith" smithbf@...>
What is wrong with code 100? It is the closest we have for PRR's 156 lbs mainline rail! It all depends on what you are modeling...
Bruce F. Smith
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]