Re: New InterMountain C&O hopper
Armand Premo
Could one then assume that the major players would be the B&O,Pennsy,and NYC?Armand Premo
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: cnw1045@gmail.com To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2013 9:49 PM Subject: [STMFC] RE: Re: New InterMountain C&O hopper Hi Don, I think there were modelable rail flows of bituminous coal from W. Va. to Vt., N.H., and Maine. For Vermont and New Hampshire, the 1% carload waybill survey suggest in 1952 and 1957 that all rail flows were dominant; for Maine marine/rail redistributional shipments were dominant. I've posted the data here together with some comments: http://cnwmodeling.blogspot.com/2013/09/on-stfmc-list-don-valentine-wrote.html Regards, Charles Hostetler --- In stmfc@yahoogroups.com, <riverman_vt@...> wrote: Ahhh, but that's the point, Tim. Those states are not northern New England. What coal came into northern New England from the N&W, C&O and Virginian areas I suspect came in on water and was delivered from places like Boston, Salem, Portsmouth, Portland and Searsport in hopper cars of teh B&M, MEC and BAR rather than those of the originating roads. Thus I'll find a way to justify one InterMountain C&O hopper rather than four or five and be satisfied with that. Cordially, Don Valentine --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com , Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote: > > > Mike, this seems incorrect to me. N&W (and no doubt C&O, B&O, VGN, NYC) > shipped WV coal to New England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and New York. > There are photos. Of course some may be loaded with other coal, but at > least we can say that N&W hoppers made it to those states. > > Tim O'Connor > > > > >Don Valentine writes: > > > >"This maybe the luck of the draw but has also caused me to > >wonder just how many C&O hoppers ever made it to northern New England > >rather than spent their entire lives in tide coal traffic. The same > >seems to be even more the case with N&W and Virginian hoppers. Can > >someone offer some knowledgeable advise on this topic?" > > > >Well, as I have noted before, the term "tide coal" doesn't work when you > >refer to N&W hoppers...assuming you refer to the Atlantic coast "tide". From > >Richard Prince's Norfolk & Western Pocahontas coal carrier, pg 240, "In 1948 > >N&W originated 52,000,000 tons of coal. Of that, 22,000,000 tons went west > >by rail. 10,000,000 tons went through Sandusky and Toledo Great Lake ports. > >Of the remaining 20,000,000 tons going east, about 10,000,000 tons went > >through Lambert Point [ tide ], 2,500,000 tons went into the Carolina's. The > >remainder went north into Maryland and DC and the rest was consumed in VA. > >However, as you suggest, little if any went into New England...wherever that > >is. > > > >Mike Brock > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|