Here is the ICC”s 1% waybill data on Bananas – IIRC for 1950 or 1956, sorted by tons to destination state, descending:
Illinois
101702
Ohio
88553
New York
82495
Michigan
67351
Pennsylvania
62039
California
53921
Texas
37960
Minnesota
33800
Wisconsin
32824
New Jersey
32442
Indiana
29347
Iowa
24723
Missouri
21786
North Carolina
19509
Tennessee
19283
Oregon
17130
West Virginia
15950
Kentucky
15651
Kansas
15179
Washington
13243
Nebraska
12401
Colorado
11929
Alabama
10136
South Carolina
9936
Mississippi
7025
Oklahoma
6675
Arizona
6401
North Dakota
6272
South Dakota
5602
Montana
5369
Arkansas
5366
Florida
5043
Utah
4062
Louisiana
4001
Idaho
3424
Georga
2373
Wyoming
1942
Virginia
939
Maryland
907
Nevada
548
New Mexico
539
A lot of speculation can be made from this list – that residents of New Mexico really didn’t much care for bananas; That Maryland used trucks from Baltimore harbor to distribute bananas; That residents of Chicago were either inordinately fond of bananas and/or that Chicago was a center of distribution to other states.
Checking on the ICC’s state to state distribution data I see that I was wrong before in suggesting Chicago was a trans-shipment center – it was not (at least was not done by rail). So apparently the truth of the matter is that in the early 1950’s the residents of Chicago were (and perhaps still are) inordinately fond of bananas, annually consuming 23.34 pounds of rail shipped bananas per capita (in New Mexico it was a mere 1.6 pounds per capita).
Having grown up near Chicago I feel obliged to go peel and eat one in respect of the pleasure of finding such interesting historical data. YMMV.
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...]
Hi Dave,
Would the banana traffic have been diverted to other destinations while en-route to Chicago? Or would the bananas be transloaded in Chicago and sent to other destinations?
I guess my REAL question is whether the bananas at the grocery warehouse in Topeka, KS would have most likely arrived in IC reefers.