Re: Digest Number 9618

Brian Termunde

I agree with Chuck, this is great info and thank you all for this information. However I too seem to be missing part five. And if there was a reply to Chuck, I seem to have missed that as well.


Take Care,
Brian R. Termunde
Midvale, UT
"My Train of Thought left the station without me!"

3a. Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [STMFC] General tank car discussion pt 6 (UNCLASS
    Posted by:  timken2626@... timken2626
    Date: Tue Jul 7, 2015 6:05 pm ((PDT))

This is a fabulous discussion, Elden. 

Did I miss a part?  Part 4 (message 135592) discusses ICC 106 to 108

Part 6 (message 135607) is a general discussion of issues.

Is there a missing part 5 between parts 4 and 6 - Maybe the brief note that type 108 cars were considered tank cars?

Thanks for putting this all out for us to absorb.

Chuck Soule

Join to automatically receive all group messages.