Re: "TW" reefer designation
Garth G. Groff <ggg9y@...>
John,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Quite a few of the large wine makers in California served primarily eastern markets up into the 1960s. Roma was the most famous. Wine from quite a few of these producers was shipped in bulk to bottling plants in the east. This pretty much ended when many of the larger California wineries went national, and there was a boomlet (later a boom in the 1970s) in east coast wineries growing hybridized grapes. AFIK, there are few, if any, California wineries shipping in bulk to the east coast now (watch someone prove me wrong!). Most ship finished wine in bottles. IIRC, Roma was one of the last of the bulk shippers. I vaguely remember seeing a Roma car in Manteca or Fresno while traveling to my parents house from college around 1970 or so. Of course, no camera, and in fact I think it was at night. I had quite forgotten the Roma wine tankers. I don't know the technical details of the tanks, but they were probably lined with glass, stainless steel, or something else. If they were bare steel, the acids in the wines would have slowly eaten away at the metal, tainting the taste of the wine with iron compounds. As we have discussed here before, the notion that all billboard reefers disappeared circa 1939 is in error. Car under lease to one company, and carrying only their products, could still be so lettered. The lettering ban applied mostly to free-floating or short-term lease cars which might carry loads for shippers other than the one advertised on the side, especially loads for competitors. I do not know about the cars in question, but photo evidence shows that certain wine cars did retain their colorful schemes up into the 1960s. I'm sure that Richard will eventually straighten us both out on this matter. He always seems to have the right answer, and the evidence to back it up. Kind regards, Garth G. Groff John Nehrich wrote:
|
|