OK, sure, but you’ve noted a Southern practice not shared by other roads. And in the case in point, these were USRA cars built 1919-1920, so as 1960 approached, they were beginning to reach the age (40 years) when they would be prohibited in interchange service. I was curious about whether these would be common in the era I am attempting to constrain my modeling to (without a whole lot of notable success, though it does affect my model and kit buying), circa 1950 and a little later. What I was able to find is that they lasted through most of the decade in respectable numbers and that they were converted to AB brakes. So I am good to go with more than one ancient version.
More recent results:
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2017 9:41 AM
Subject: [STMFC] Re: ORERs
Re car quantities in RER
Can I suggest using RERs to determine the quantity of any railroad equipment at a particular time is subject to a lot of error?
If a series of cars is due to be taken off the roster due to age or rebuilding, there is no need for a railroad to “count down” the number of cars in a series with any accuracy. For example, if car in a series was scrapped, it could never appear in interchange. No clerk would look in an RER and care there were XX number of cars still in service, they would only be looking for the data on the specific car number they were concerned about. All they would be looking for is the car series that single car comes from to determine the Capy, etc. they needed to know.
The Southern’s practice seemed to be to modify car quantities for cars in service but stop making RER changes if they decided to take that series out of service. Rather than try to keep changing continually declining numbers, they would wait until none were left and delete the entire series.
The reverse was also true, cars could be in the RER that were not yet on the roster. They would never be seen in interchange so there would be no problem. Because cars had to be in the RER before they could be interchanged, the entry needed to be in place before they were delivered or in service.
In at least one Southern Rwy case, a series of cars was in the RER that never existed. The plan was for a group of 40 foot box cars to be given 70-ton trucks and renumbered. That group of cars existed twice in the RER, once under their original number series and also with their new 70-ton capacity numbers. For whatever reason, the 70-ton trucks were not purchased. Some repainted/renumbered cars had to be changed back to their 50-ton road numbers.
RERs are a good, widely available resource but we need to be careful using them to answer questions they were never intended to deal with.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]