Re: Side-door Cabooses [was Why Transfer cabooses?]
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Did they want to force separate drover cars for the farmers? Were there more bunk spaces?
On May 23, 2018 at 9:05 PM Jeffy White <jrwhite@...> wrote:
This doesn't explain why the IC built different cabooses to operate in Iowa. I'm not an attorney but in my career as a police officer I read and interpreted statutes all the time and by my reading of the law, the standard IC caboose met all of the requirements of the law. Yet they built cabooses just like the standard cabooses only without the side doors to run in Iowa.
It seems to me that there almost had to be something else that caused them to build those Iowa cabooses. All of the IC literature I have read says side door cabooses were not legal in Iowa.
I wonder what the reason was?
On 5/23/2018 2:51 PM, Dennis Storzek wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 09:19 am, Nelson Moyer wrote:
But they did require end platforms. This link should take you to the announcement of the 1911 law:
I’m pretty sure that Iowa did not ban side door waycars in any form.
I was also interested to learn that Lorenzo S. Coffin, the railroad safety crusader from the late nineteenth century, was an Iowa state railroad commissioner.
Join main@RealSTMFC.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.