Re: GM&O 4670
jace6315
I suspect that the draw to the GM&O was that wooden single sheathed cars were likely cheaper to buy (but more expensive to maintain) compared to the steel sided cars (single or double sheathed).
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jim Matthews
-------- Original message -------- From: Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> Date: 1/30/19 12:05 PM (GMT-05:00) To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] GM&O 4670 Yep, you're right. Including the War Emergency cars, the GM&O had "modern" single sheathed box cars with 4-4, 4-5, and 5-5 ends! I think you're right - looks like GM&O followed the 1932, then the 1937, and then the modified 1937 AAR designs. A case of they liked the box cars but preferred to use wood sides - perhaps to mollify their local lumber mill customers. Tim O'Connor On 1/29/2019 1:58 PM, Benjamin Scanlon via Groups.Io wrote: > Hi, is it though, Tim? > > 6470 (sorry for wrong number in title of email) looks to have 4-4 > ends, the 20188 has 4-5. > > Also if you count the horizontal corrugations on the door, 6470 has 16 > and 20188 has 18. > > Further, look at where the diagonal brace ends on the car end, on the > two cars. > > I am wondering if 20188 may be a composite sided version of a 1937 AAR? > -- > Ben Scanlon > Tottenham, England -- *Tim O'Connor* *Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
|