Re: Stalking PFE Reefers
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Its my understanding that reefers moved on mileage rates, not per diem, so when they were empty there was no rush to get them back to where they had come from. That is probably over simplified but I also know that empty reefer were often used for moving printed material such as magazines and catalogs to warehouses near where the cars had originated on reduced rates that allowed the carrier to pay the mileage charge but recoup that by charging for moving the printed material. When I worked for C&NW in Chicago W.F.Hall printing used to ship Playboy magazines and Sears, Montgomery Ward, and Spiegel cataloge in empty PFE cars moving to the west coast. Perhaps someone with a better understanding of this will respond. Tony Wagner
On Sunday, August 4, 2019, 1:57:04 PM CDT, Bob Chaparro via Groups.Io <chiefbobbb@...> wrote:
Stalking PFE Reefers
The comment below was in response to a discussion about per diem rates on the CB&Q Group. I believe Tony Thompson has mentioned PFE's need to gather their reefers, also.
Thank you for the discussion of per diem rates and whether they were too low or too high. I wonder what the home railroad was for refrigerator cars when the refrigerator car company was owned by more than one railroad, such as the PFE. My dad was a traveling agent for PFE (out of Chicago) form 1945 to 1960 or so. It seemed to me his main job was not checking on icings but rather visiting yard offices (making a circuit in an area over the ear) to find the PFE cars that were being held. It did not seem a priority of the railroads anywhere, so far as I could tell, to return the cars.