Re: MEK Substitute and current plastic cements

Tony Thompson
 

Paul Woods wrote:

You are quite correct, Jon - neither Toluene nor MEK are regarded as being carcinogenic (except in California, where apparently EVERYTHING is)  . . .

    Please stop these uninformed and foolish remarks. The issues with a number of solvents in California are about air pollution, not cancer per se. California's Proposition 65 does require "cancer danger" notices for a great many substances (all of which, incidentally, ARE proven carcinogens), but that's a different story.


Tony Thompson
Berkeley, CA



Join main@RealSTMFC.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.