Re: Early 1900's Wood Freight Cars

Paul Hillman

Bob Webber wrote:
"G" gauge is, for 4'8.5" correct for 1/32.
It is correct for 3' at 1:20.3 (or Fn3)
It is correct for meter gauge at 1:22.5 (which is why LGB uses
It is correct for 2' in (I think it is) 1:16.

I think, apparently, Bob Webber provided an excellent clarification
of the G scale/gauge question.

But, now another "scale" question comes back to my mind about "O

To MY understanding/memory, true "O scale" is 5mm=1'0".!!??

I have "old" Model Railroader magazines which discuss this issue.

Somewhere back in the 19??'s, model trains where being imported to
the US from Germany(?), England(?), which were metric 5mm=1'0".

Then "HO" came along, (Half-O), and thus it was 3.5mm=1'0", as it is

Both "O" & "HO" scales originated in Europe/England????

There was an article in a MR mag about this, 1950ish(?), wherein the
question of going to an American 1/4" scale instead of 5mm, and it
would be called "Q" scale. But, I guess it never caught on.???

How I noticed/remembered this was when I hand-laid some "O" scale
track at 4'-8 1/2" @ 1/4"=1'0". Then I bought some Atlas freight-
trucks, and they were too big for the interior track-gauge that I'd

I measured the flange-spacing of the trucks and they computed out to
5mm. I respaced the wheels and all was workable.

I've discussed this "fact" with many "pros" who claim they've never
heard of such a thing. My main railroading has been in HO, but my
continuous "dabbling" takes me into other scales as well.

How do "Proto 48" folks address this issue?

Paul Hillman

Join to automatically receive all group messages.