Re: "Reciprocal" Switching - Please Explain

Paul & Theri Koehler <buygone@...>


When an industry was within the "Reciprocal Switching Limits" any carries
serving that "Switching Limits" was considered to be serving that industry.
In your example the SP physically served the industry, but WP could solicit
the long haul on any inbound or outbound traffic and all SP got for the
handling was a switching charge. If on the other hand the industry was not
within the "Reciprocal Switching Limits" then the SP would get a division of
the line haul revenue.

Paul C. Koehler


From: Beckert, Shawn [mailto:Shawn.Beckert@...]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:41 PM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] "Reciprocal" Switching - Please Explain


Is there a document or publication that explains the details
of "reciprocal switching"? This Western Pacific circular that
I'm wading through seems to give witness to a lot of this.

An example: The Judson-Pacific Murphy Company (a steel plant)
had two tracks in Emeryville with a combined capacity of 80
cars. That's a heckuva lot of gondolas and boxcars moving in
and out. This whole industry is listed on the tracks of the
Southern Pacific, yet the circular shows this as being served
by the Western Pacific.

How did this work? If the trackage was owned by the Espee, I
can't imagine them standing by while WP took the business of
a very large shipper away from them. Money must have changed
hands for the owner of the trackage (SP) to allow a competitor
(WP) to service one of their on-line industries.

Can someone clarify how this sort of transaction was done?


Shawn Beckert

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


oups/S=1705169725:HM/EXP=1110926504/A=2593423/R=0/SIG=11el9gslf/*http:/www.n> click here



Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<> Terms of Service.

Join to automatically receive all group messages.