Re: "Reciprocal" Switching - Please Explain


Bill McCoy <bugsy451@...>
 

The open an prepay station list does not do any thing other than
identify stations, their location, station number and whether it is
an "open" ie. can receive colect and COD shipments and a station that
can only receice prepaid shipments. In earlier days "open" roughly
meant a full service station with agent and "prepaid" meant no agent
to be able to handle collect shipments. Open and Prepays, especially
old ones are interesting in that they have a section listing stations
by line segment many of which don't appear in timetables.

Each terminal or group of terminals has a tariff that deals with
industry status including what constitutes switchable traffic.

Bill McCoy
Jax



--- In STMFC@..., "Paul & Theri Koehler" <buygone@e...>
wrote:
Shawn:



There is or was a Tariff "Leland's Open and Prepay" you will need
to check
the spelling on Leland's, that lists all railroads stations and
weather or
not they were open. It behooved all railroads to maintain an
aggressive
Sales department to minimize their short hauls in these
situations. When it
was found that a given industry was short hauling you as a carrier,
you
could disrupt their flow of cars with disrupted switching and not
placing
the empties which would need to be supplied by the long haul
carrier. This
could backfire on the carrier or could result in a change of policy
by the
shipper.



Paul C. Koehler



_____

From: Beckert, Shawn [mailto:Shawn.Beckert@d...]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:31 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re: "Reciprocal" Switching - Please Explain



Paul Koehler wrote:

When an industry was within the "Reciprocal Switching Limits" any
carries
serving that "Switching Limits" was considered to be serving that
industry.
In your example the SP physically served the industry, but WP
could
solicit
the long haul on any inbound or outbound traffic and all SP got
for the
handling was a switching charge. If on the other hand the
industry was
not
within the "Reciprocal Switching Limits" then the SP would get a
division
of
the line haul revenue.
I'm with you so far on this - basically it behooved the Southern
Pacific to
offer competitive rates and service to these Bay Area shippers in
order to
keep
the business from being stolen by WP, AT&SF etc. Now, as to the
subject of
the
"switching districts" - all this would be laid out with SP and WP
tariffs
filed
with the ICC, would it not? Have any (or all) of these tariffs been
preserved
someplace by the government, or anyone else for that matter?
Obviously if I
want
to find out which railroad was allowed to switch its competitors
shippers,
I'll
need to track down some of these tariffs. If they still exist...

As a side note, in leafing through this circular it's become clear
that a
large
majority of industries in the Bay Area were located on railroads
other than
WP.
Obviously the Wobbly would really have had to hustle to try and
steal
business
away from the SP and Santa Fe, who of course would take a dim view
of this.
I do
wonder if this isn't the reason the WP struggled all its life, and
ended up
being
eaten by the Union Pacific?

Shawn Beckert





Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



ADVERTISEMENT

<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129mj1v7q/M=298184.6018725.7038619.300117
6/D=gr
oups/S=1705169725:HM/EXP=1110997920/A=2593423/R=0/SIG=11el9gslf/*http:
/www.n
etflix.com/Default?mqso=60190075> click here



<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
M=298184.6018725.7038619.3001176/D=groups/S=
:HM/A=2593423/rand=690831428>



_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFC/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
STMFC-unsubscribe@...
<mailto:STMFC-unsubscribe@...?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



Join {main@RealSTMFC.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.