Faster yes,but different terrain.Do you remember that the Rutland once
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
owned ships?(That is until the government scuttled the fleet).This thread is
going nowhere.We all enjoy what we saw or experienced ..Armand Premo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hendrickson" <rhendrickson@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: [STMFC] RE: Hoppers to and From Canada
On Jul 19, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Richard Dermody wrote:
Richard Hendrickson wrote;Dick, I'll keep this short, as this isn't the steam loco list. I had,
"And for about twenty-five miles I was privliged to sit at the
throttle of a
Mikado that, though branch line power on the Santa Fe, was more steam
than anything the Rutland ever owned."
Sorry, Richard, but the Rutland also owned the last 4-8-2's ever
the United States. Admittedly, not the Western behemoths you cite, but
than a trifle better than a Mikado.
indeed, forgotten about the Rutland's 4-8-2s, which were handsome and
capable locos for their size (though there were only four of them and
they didn't last long). With 73" drivers they were doubtless faster
than a typical western Mike but weighed little more and developed
considerably less tractive effort. A Santa Fe 2-8-2 built in the
mid-1920s would start more train, keep it moving better on grades, run
much farther between water stops with its 15K gal. tender, and after
modernization with disc main drivers was capable of sustained speeds in
the 60s, probably as fast or faster than freight trains ever ran on the
Rutland. "More than a trifle better?" I don't think so.
Yahoo! Groups Links
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.1/51 - Release Date: 7/18/05