Did not NWSL offer a flywheel chassis that could be used with an Athern box car to simulate train momentum?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Aug 26, 2005, at 12:27 PM, Tom Jones III wrote:
My thoughts were motorized momentum in the cars, or flywheel driven momentum
in the cars. DCC is too much for individual cars when it is possible to
simply (yeah, right!) have the car sense its own speed and through a
computer program onboard the car control the momentum motor that drives the
wheels, or provides resistance. A flywheel may be a lot easier, not sure
about cheaper. It would provide a sort of brake when stopped, but it
certainly would push the train along when moving!
Tom Jones III
----- Original Message -----
Re: Scale Weights - Doubt It(snip)
Then after accomplishing this you run into the problem of how our layoutsaren't actual scale
models, in fact most don't even approach being scale. Most are sodrastically foreshortened that a
1:1 freight car's dynamics when scaled down acting under the forces ofmomentum would roll much
farther than most of our sidings and yards are long. A freight taking amile to stop would take how
many dozen laps of most of our layouts to achieve that? That's if youdon't have a point to point,
in that case it just goes over the edge because the world is flat. Herethere be dragons and they
find model railroad equipment to be tasty. That's why it keepsdisappearing off the edge of the
layout, never to be seen again. :-)the reality that our
The more you try to mimic the prototype the more you end up demonstrating
models are basically toys, well, expensive toys.
Yahoo! Groups Links