Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Pat Wider wrote (responding to Randy Hees):
To quote theIt was well recognized, all right: by the operating boys. Mechanical departments disliked this idea, as weight savings often meant different designs and different materials, which then became THEIR headache. Traffic people knew that the cars were rarely loaded to capacity, so the claim of "converting the saving into revenue load" was, statistically, silly. And of course US Steel wanted to sell premium steels, if they could just persuade railroads that they needed them . . .
I don't think the case is so simple as you state, Pat, certainly not prior to, say, 1960. Indeed, if "everyone" knew this, those ads you quote wouldn't have needed to press the point.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, firstname.lastname@example.org
Publishers of books on railroad history