Re: Attitudes of kit producers

Gatwood, Elden <Elden.Gatwood@...>

Tim and folks;

Actually, several manufacturers are asking. We even put in some "plugs"
for many of the cars that have been discussed on "want lists" over the
past several years. I happen to agree that we are reaching the point
that they will do signature cars and others that have less than
extensive numbers of RRs using them, as I am sure most of the more
"popular" cars have been exhausted.

Don't underestimate the power you have in writing or contacting these
folks. If you don't ask, you will not get it....


-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 11:57 AM
To: STMFC@...
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Attitudes of kit producers

A big reason why I often dispute the "conventional wisdom" of
manufacturers in regards to road names is because their sales
(or lack thereof) are often a result of their own mistakes or poor
choices. For example, Proto 2000 did some SD9 SP units in a
very light gray color, and they didn't sell well. Duh! And then it
was 3 or more years before they finally did a Tiger Stripes version
which sold out fast. Duh again! Or another example would be a
Union Pacific B-50-24 box car painted as a Rutland PS-1! Did the
Rutland fans swoon? They did not. So now I'm sure Trix thinks
"Oh, nobody wants to buy Rutland freight cars!"

Athearn these days seems to be the most receptive to making
corrections before producing models, based on getting appropriate
and timely feedback on upcoming models. What a concept -- let
the customers TELL you exactly what they want, and then produce
it for them.

Tim O'Connor

I have heard similar descriptions of what roadnames sell (and
which don't) from a STMFC manufacturer. In fact, we were both in
Beach at the time. The point is that even current data shows that
are some roads that have a loyal following, and others that don't.

Yahoo! Groups Links

Join to automatically receive all group messages.