Re: REA 6900-7899 class
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:27:23 -0500 "Mike Brock" <brockm@...>
Byron Rose notes:to
Are you sure that IS the date, and not the part of it that's not been
scraped off from having said "58"? I don't mean to get into an argument
over this, but I've always been skeptical about dates given to photos. I
will agree that an air tank date is usually more reliable, but if it's a
car I like, the date doesn't bother me a bit. See rule number one!
I also didn't feel it was worth jumping all over Vic Roseman about a
perceived error in dating a cars birth. The point I thought I was making
is that the ORER data pretty much confirmed his dates. Your photo simply
made a liar out of that usually unimpeachable source. I do agree with
the comment that Vic is still the only person to write a book on REA. We
desperately need a more thorough study, along with FGEX and
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: