Re: STMFC Apologies etc.
Mike Brock,toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
As the list owner, you get to frame the
standards for the STMFC list. Set the standards where ever
you feel comfortable. I obviously have different standards
governing civil discourse. Since we disagree, I have an
alternate way of addressing the problem I perceive with a
member of the STMFC list. I intend to address the issue by
using the capabilities of the browser software.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Brock" <email@example.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 22 January, 2002 22:27
Subject: [STMFC] STMFC Apologies etc.
: Mike Carson says:
: > Byron,
: > I suggest you owe Norm Dresner and the list
: > apology for your intemperate remarks.
: Now let's see. Where'd I put my STMFC Owner hat? I know
it's around here
: somewhere....ah ha! Hmmm. Still fits. OK.....
: A primary rule of the STMFC is that we have only one cop.
Yep. Me. To remind
: everyone, you may express your view about a product...even
: from criticism from another member. Another member can
also express his/her
: view on the same subject...again free from criticism from
: The views will stand or fail on their own merit.
: Now, as far as apologies etc., from Byron Rose, I've taken
a look at the
: messages and I see nothing worthy of attention. The
reference to clods:
: Norm (and some of you clods who haven't a clue as to how
we got where we
: is not significant and doesn't even include Norm.
: For sure, Byron confused a message of mine with another.
He no doubt
: realizes that now. It is time to move on. Messages about
: anyone need to be taken off line, however. If messages in
violation of STMFC
: rules occur I'll take care of any needed policing.
: Mike Brock
: STMFC Owner
: To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
: Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to