Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Rich Orr wrote:
You are never going to win this. From the previous comments it is very clear that the revisionist historian philosophy is being espoused. That is the 'historians" are free to reshape the data in any manner as long as it supports their hypothesis. Draw a conclusion and make the facts fit the conclusion. The antithesis of the scientific method. And those of us who care that facts be facts which are not subject to interpretation but rather allow one to understand the entire picture recognize this philosophy which is rampant among today's alleged historians. It is back dated social engineering that allows what is politically correct today (i.e. expedient) to change the facts of the past.Not a bad (if hostile) summary of Mr. Foucault and friends. You are right that those who accept this view that "historical conclusions are all personal" probably could not care less about what we call "accuracy" on this list.
Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history