Re: J&L tanks cars
cj riley <cjriley42@...>
Thanks for the reference. I will check the archives. I am sceptical of the
captive service theory. As a former Pittsburgher whose father worked for J&L I
would have to say shuttling coal tar between 2 steel mills makes little sense.
Coal tar was a valuable byproduct and would likely be used by a chemical plant.
Unless, as I often am, I am way off base.
--- Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote:
On Dec 28, 2006, at 8:09 PM, cj riley wrote:Hi guys,CJ, there was a lengthy discussion of these cars, especially with
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around