Re: Going Bananas ...
armprem
Tim,IMHO it was a matter of "long haul", as opposed to"Short haul ".Armand Premo
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim O'Connor" <timboconnor@comcast.net> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Going Bananas ... > >>The pre-eminence of the Pennsy, both its operating and mechanical >>departments, peaked early in the 20th century and rapidly declined >>thereafter owing to arrogance and bad management, with the >>post-World-War-I squandering of capital on its ill-conceived >>electrification project hastening its eventual demise. > > Oh that's just silly. The SP had "ill-conceived elecrification" > projects, and built large new passenger terminals long after the > decline in passenger traffic was well under way. I agree the PRR > was arrogant, but so were most other railroads -- pride and tunnel > vision were widespread traits of railroad management. > > The PRR, NYC, B&O, NH, B&M, Erie, Lackawanna, LV -- ALL of them > declined precipitously following WWII. And all of the western roads > thrived in the 20 years after WWII. Gee, could it have something to > do with the population explosion in the west, and the shifting of > industry to wide open spaces where longer hauls were the norm? If it > hadn't been for Powder River coal and trade with Asia, we'd have > had a western version of the pre-Conrail meltdown by now... > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.15/728 - Release Date: 3/20/2007 8:07 AM > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|