Re: Biggest thing ever transported by rail? . . . up to May 1958
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Alan;
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
They were commonly placed on crosswise 4 by 6's (or similar) so one could get cables or chains under the load, and then blocked with stacks of wood blocks nailed together in as high a stack as necessary to secure the load from lateral or endwise movement. The AAR loading rules go into much detail on how to secure each type of load. If the crates were tall, or had a high center of gravity, they would put pieces of wood up the ends and put diagonals up against them to prevent it from tipping. Steel-floored gons had to have cribbing installed since you couldn't nail the blocks to the floor, and were much more complicated to secure many loads in. This was why some railroads did not have a lot of steel-floored gons, even though they were probably more durable. Some shippers insisted on wood floors. Elden Gatwood ________________________________ From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Monk Alan Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:31 AM To: STMFC@... Subject: RE: [STMFC] Biggest thing ever transported by rail? . . . up to May 1958 Hmmm... strictly speaking, it's not a single *load* though. When broken down into it's constituent parts, it required something like 5 or 6 separate trains to move Dora from place to place (plus a train for the security battalion, a train for the flak batallion, a train for the engineers....) When set up in the firing location, it sat on a pair of curved parallel tracks and was moved up and down by a pair of specialist low-geared diesel locos. I am tempted by the 1:35 kit though... and I've seen a website for a scratchbuilt one-SIXTH scale model too. (IMHO largest 'rail mounted' load would be a complete Saturn V on the 'railroad' linking the VAB and the pad ^_^ ) Onto more list-relevant matters :) When crates were loaded into gons, how was the load restrained from sliding along or across the gon?? Ropes? Chains? Chocks/blocks?? I've got a couple of gons which I want to load with crates, but I've yet to find a pic looking down into one so loaded. Cheers, Alan, London, UK
-----Original Message-----
From: destron@... <mailto:destron%40vcn.bc.ca> Sent: 22 July 2008 05:20 To: STMFC@... <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Biggest thing ever transported by rail? . . . up to May 1958 2 questions back: 1, does that 'biggest' have to have been something in the US? 2, does a railway gun count? If the answers are NO and YES respectively... maybe this: http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10854 <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10854> <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10854 <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10854> > - this is a 1/35 model of the monster... http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10845 <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10845> <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10845 <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10845> > - a ww2 era photo of the prototype... http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10849&t=1 <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10849&t=1> <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10849&t=1 <http://railserbia.net/forum/download/file.php?id=10849&t=1> > - a shell for the thing, next to a T-34 tank... Crazy Russians... :D Frank Valoczy Vancouver, BC Folks,NEWS article from May 30, 1958. It deals with a very large atomicreactor movement via river barge up the Tennessee River to the C&O atMuncie, Indiana, up to Grand Rapids, Michigan, and finally over to theEnrico Fermi plant site 30 miles south of Detroit. Biggest appears tobe defined as a "height [22'above top of rails]and width [14' 61/2"] combo" definition. We are NOT talking about long Butane Tanksthat are almost three flat cars long. The weight was only 91 tons.wheel assemblies that appeared to have gone down between the railsin special to meet height requirements.time, so no real rush. . <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=2554753/grpspId=1705169725/m <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=2554753/grpspId=1705169725/m> sgId=74400/stime=1216700385/nc1=4430620/nc2=3848627/nc3=5028924> ******************************************************************** The contents of the e-mail and any transmitted files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Transport for London hereby exclude any warranty and any liability as to the quality or accuracy of the contents of this email and any attached transmitted files. If you are not the intended recipient be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited., If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster@... <mailto:postmaster%40tfl.gov.uk> ., This email has been sent from Transport for London, or from one of the companies within its control within the meaning of Part V of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989. Further details about TfL and its subsidiary companies can be found at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/ourcompany, <http://www.tfl.gov.uk/ourcompany,> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************
|
|