Digest Number 5367
Stan Hall
Steam era freight car discussion group. The time period covered will
be from 1900-1960. Messages In This Digest (8 Messages) 1a. Re: ORER discrepancy From: George Hollwedel 1b. Re: ORER discrepancy From: George W Simmons 2.1. Re: Per Diem From: mcindoefalls 2.2. Re: Per Diem From: George W Simmons 2.3. Re: Per Diem From: Steve Lucas 3.1. Re: What HO truck(s) do we STMFC'ers want? From: finkfam98055 3.2. Re: What HO truck(s) do we STMFC'ers want? From: Brian J Carlson 3.3. Re: What HO truck(s) do we STMFC'ers want? From: Brian Leppert View All Topics | Create New Topic Messages 1a. Re: ORER discrepancy Posted by: "George Hollwedel" proto.nscale@... proto.nscale Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:09 pm (PDT) Is "uo" US? Is "cay" car? Prototype N Scale Models (TM) by George Hollwedel 310 Loma Verde St Buda, TX 78610-9785 512-796-6883 www.micro-trains.com/sr-0806-hollwedelATSF.php www.micro-trains.com/hollwedel.php www.imrcmodels.com/n/sr/html/GHollATSFExpressN.htm > ------------------- > The impetus was to have accuracy only on the uo side. It > was necessary that any cay that might handle revenue traffic > be listed, but not that every car listed be in service, or > even exist. > > > > Malcolm Laughlin, Editor > 617-489-4383 > New England Rail Shipper Directories > 19 Holden Road, Belmont, MA 02478 > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (3) 1b. Re: ORER discrepancy Posted by: "George W Simmons" GEORGESIMMONS@... realmopacman Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:48 pm (PDT) --- In STMFC@..., George Hollwedel <proto.nscale@...> wrote: > > Is "uo" US? Is "cay" car? > I would say "uo" was to be "up" as in above the actual number and not the railroad. And car makes sense in the sentence. George Simmons Dry Prong, LA Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (3) 2.1. Re: Per Diem Posted by: "mcindoefalls" mcindoefalls@... mcindoefalls Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:06 pm (PDT) I think Steve's point was that the (bankrupt) O&W owed much, much more in per diem payments than it could ever hope to receive from its connections, given the paltry number of O&W cars that could go off-line. I would venture to say that most of those O&W cars were hoppers, which would likely stay on line or close to home. And so, the O&W would have been shoveling per diem money out, while receiving next to nothing in per diem receipts. Walt Lankenau --- In STMFC@..., timboconnor@... wrote: > > Steve > > Per diem in the 1950's was the same for all box cars, and was quite > low -- IIRC less than $3 a day. Unless the NYSW was a parking lot for > offline cars, I doubt they suffered from per diem overhead. After all, if > they could move a car across the system in 24 hours, they might avoid > having to pay any per diem at all. > > Tim > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Steve Lucas" <stevelucas3@...> > > The Jan., 1953 ORER shows the NYO&W as having 146 cars suitable for > > interchange. For an over 400-mile Class One pike, this road must > > have had substantial per diem costs. No wonder that they went under > > in 1957. > > > > Steve Lucas. > Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (33) 2.2. Re: Per Diem Posted by: "George W Simmons" GEORGESIMMONS@... realmopacman Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:49 pm (PDT) --- In STMFC@..., "mcindoefalls" <mcindoefalls@...> wrote: > > I think Steve's point was that the (bankrupt) O&W owed much, much more > in per diem payments than it could ever hope to receive from its > connections, given the paltry number of O&W cars that could go > off-line. I would venture to say that most of those O&W cars were > hoppers, which would likely stay on line or close to home. I checked the 1953 ORER reprint and the Old Woman owned a total of 13 boxcars each with interior length of 36 feet. Also, I wonder about the speed of trains accross the Old and Weary, would they be able to move cars at a speed that would preclude per diem payments. George Simmons Dry Prong, LA Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (33) 2.3. Re: Per Diem Posted by: "Steve Lucas" stevelucas3@... stevelucas3 Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:25 pm (PDT) The O&W did have some longhaul freights that ran between Scranton, PA and Maybrook, NY in less than 16 hours. But any car terminating on the O&W would have been on the property more than 24'. And I don't recall the O&W originating a lot of tonnage in its 20 years of bankruptcy from 1937-57. They did move some pig iron south out of Oswego, NY, but it's been suggested that this traffic did not produce much revenue after per-diem (foreign roads' cars being used) and terminal expenses. Other roads might have been able to balance the per diem payments on foreign cars agianst money owed for their cars, but not the Old Woman. The O&W did have many strikes aginst it in the later years, and the per-diem expenses can't have helped its financial position. Steve Lucas. (always looking to learn more about the O&W) In STMFC@..., "George W Simmons" <GEORGESIMMONS@...> wrote: > > --- In STMFC@..., "mcindoefalls" <mcindoefalls@> wrote: > > > > I think Steve's point was that the (bankrupt) O&W owed much, much more > > in per diem payments than it could ever hope to receive from its > > connections, given the paltry number of O&W cars that could go > > off-line. I would venture to say that most of those O&W cars were > > hoppers, which would likely stay on line or close to home. > > I checked the 1953 ORER reprint and the Old Woman owned a total of 13 > boxcars each with interior length of 36 feet. Also, I wonder about the > speed of trains accross the Old and Weary, would they be able to move > cars at a speed that would preclude per diem payments. > > George Simmons > Dry Prong, LA > Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (33) 3.1. Re: What HO truck(s) do we STMFC'ers want? Posted by: "finkfam98055" finkfam2@... finkfam98055 Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:41 pm (PDT) I have not seen anyone mentioned it yet, so I'll remind members that Eastern Car Works offers 3 different types of 4-wheel, 70-ton HO trucks. I've used and can recommend their #9064 Bettendorf as representative of the type. Note that the Eastern Car Works trucks need careful assembly (with glue) and do not come with wheels. Retail list price is $3 for a pair. I believe #9064 is the same type as pictured at the link to the ERIE 10325 gon photo in message 75505 (thanks John Hile). http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/el/frt/erie10325b.jpg Larry Fink --- In STMFC@..., "John Hile" <john66h@...> wrote: > > --- In STMFC@..., "Brian Leppert" <b.leppert@> wrote: > > > > I think any properly rendered 70-ton truck in HO will look distinctly > > different from 50-ton trucks, especially with that wider bolster, > and are > > certainly needed. Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (27) 3.2. Re: What HO truck(s) do we STMFC'ers want? Posted by: "Brian J Carlson" brian@... prrk41361 Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:35 pm (PDT) True, and I used some ECW Dalman's before Brian's came out. However, the ECW trucks are stryene and wear out with use. This can be fixed by delrin axle point caps. However, Tahoe trucks are better detailed, and one piece acetal plastic so if Brian does do a 70 ton truck, I have a ton of P2k gons that can use them. Brian J Carlson P.E. Cheektowaga NY Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (27) 3.3. Re: What HO truck(s) do we STMFC'ers want? Posted by: "Brian Leppert" b.leppert@... brianleppert Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:22 am (PDT) Andy and Jason, The Atlas truck is a very poor representation of the National C-1 70- ton truck. If you have Tony's SP Freight Cars, vol.1, Gondolas and Stock Cars, see page 218 for what the prototype really looks like. Brian Leppert Tahoe Model Works Carson City, NV --- In STMFC@..., "Andy Sperandeo" <asperandeo@...> wrote: > > Brian, I think you're on to something with the 70-ton trucks. I just built a Sunshine NYC > gondola kit that needed 70-ton trucks with a 3-1-3 spring package. I used a pair of Atlas > trucks from a Hart convertible ballast car, adding semi-scale wheels and Kadee brake shoes. > However, Atlas doesn't list these as separate parts and they aren't as nice as your trucks > anyway. > > Good luck, > > Andy > Back to top Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post Messages in this topic (27) RECENT ACTIVITY 1 New Photos 5 New Files Visit Your Group Y! Sports for TV Access it for free Get Fantasy Sports stats on your TV. Yahoo! News Get it all here Breaking news to entertainment news Share Photos Put your favorite photos and more online. Need to Reply? Click one of the "Reply" links to respond to a specific message in the Daily Digest. Create New Topic | Visit Your Group on the Web Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Members | Calendar Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Individual | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
|
|