Re: from 40' 6' to 50' 6" box cars
water.kresse@...
Richard,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
My midwest reference was aimed at focusing on midwest railroads' needs. If universal across the States and Canada . . . great . . . even better. Al
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:48 AM, al.kresse wrote: Do we have the short list of key reasons (such as market andNo mystery here. After WW II box car traffic increasingly shifted toward lighter, bulkier loads, notably auto parts, for which 50' cars were better suited. This trend was reinforced by the development of covered hoppers for grain service, replacing the 40' box cars with grain doors that had formerly been used. And I would take issue with your "especially in the midwest and east" statement. For example, the Santa Fe built their last 40' box cars in 1952; all new box cars delivered after that date were 50' cars. The same decision was made by the Southern Pacific only a year later, in 1953. Essentially, by the early 1950s most RRs owned all the 40' box cars they needed, while much new rail traffic required longer cars with, in many cases, DF loaders and other special loading equipment. Richard Hendrickson
|
|