Re: X43C side sills
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Andy;
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I am sure you are right, but I did not go into some of the issues I do not have good enough info on. I do not know if the cross-bearers were beefed up on the 8-foot door cars, or not (I suspect not), but the introduction of door gussets, beefed-up side sills, and introduction of newer, heavier designs was clearly a response to the perceived inadequacies of some of the lightweight designs and other designs adopted earlier for use by the PRR. If most of their box cars had spent their time hauling grain, these fixes may not have ever been necessary. Elden Gatwood ________________________________ From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Andy Miller Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:46 AM To: STMFC@... Subject: Re: [STMFC] X43C side sills I suspect the X43C's were also the worst because they had the widest doors (8 ft) and therefore the least longitudinal strength. regards, Andy Miller
----- Original Message -----
From: Gatwood, Elden J SAD To: STMFC@... <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 7:55 AM Subject: RE: [STMFC] X43C side sills . . . The X43 classes (X43 through X43C) were a disappointment to the PRR. They rapidly exhibited sagging and cracking problems, necessitating these fixes. The X43C was the worst, since they were often diverted into coil service and other uses involving forklifts, that contributed to the problem. . . . Elden Gatwood Recent Activity a.. 3New Members Visit Your Group Yahoo! News Odd News You won't believe it, but it's true Sitebuilder Build a web site quickly & easily with Sitebuilder. Group Charity i-SAFE Keep your kids safer online .
|
|