Richard, in your experience how reliable are diagram books in regard to dimensions? For example, if a bolster-to-striker distance is cited as 5'6", may one take that it isn't 5'0"?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-- TIA --
-- Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote:
On Aug 10, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Gene Deimling wrote:
LouGene, RR diagram books were often more confusing than helpful
The Lackawanna diagram book dated 1953 shows that they were
converting to AB brakes and Ajax brake wheels at the date of
publication. The trucks were listed as a USS pattern which appears
to be similar to the AAR double truss design. I have seen it
described in other sources as a Gould sideframe. Maybe someone
else on the list can clear up this description.
regarding trucks. The RRs typically ordered side frames, bolsters,
and other truck parts separately, and the diagram for a particular
car might show the side frames as "Gould #456" or perhaps just "Gould
cast steel." In such cases, you really have to look at photos to
determine what type of side frame it was.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]