Re: Prototype accuracy: a mfr's viewpoint
Armand Premo
Assembling?Ah Ha,that's the rub.There are many of us who enjoy building kits.This accounts for the success of the resin model producers.Those with little time to build are in a different league.Many of us have few ready -to- run cars on our layouts for several reasons.Price,Accuracy and Selection .I would like to hear what others think on the subject.Armand Premo
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim King To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:40 AM Subject: [STMFC] Prototype accuracy: a mfr's viewpoint As a resin kit manufacturer, let me give my perspective on what can and can't be duplicated prototypically in scale. First off, keep in mind that all of us modelers are trying to create the illusion of reality using scale models. It is physically impossible to reproduce every part .. to scale .. on any car, loco or structure and still be able to manufacturer it, unless you're working in scale where you can ride the equipment! An example would be a free-standing piece of ΒΌ" thick plate in HO, which scales down to .0028" actual size. That's about the thickness of a piece of cellophane tape. Even with today's rapid prototyping technology (like I use) and fancy injection molding, getting a part this small out of a rubber mold or injection mold would be nearly impossible without breaking the vast majority. Second, as for collecting info to make kits or RTR "right", this is all a matter of economics for the manufacturer. There are at least 2 very basic differences between resin kit makers and mass-production houses like Athearn and Kadee. (1) resin kit makers usually target prototypes that were obscure, maybe ran on only 1 road or had several variations that could be handled by supplying parts that the modeler chooses to apply and (2) the amount of time and dollars invested in a project to design, tool, produce and market anything can seem to be just as daunting for either kit or RTR companies. I'm sure credible manufacturers apply due diligence in researching a prototype, such as buying drawings and photos, field research, book research, etc. All of this takes time so having as many prototypes paint schemes for 1 "basic" car is key to "the big guys" being successful. It's obvious to even the most novice modeler that the retail price is a direct reflection on how much effort went into a particular RTR car. Compare a Kadee boxcar at $30+ with separate everything to a Branchline "Yardmaster series" with everything molded on at less than half the price. Designing, producing and assembling all those parts takes a lot of effort and money, so why shouldn't the retail price be higher? This is also true for resin kit makers .. the same is true for us "little guys". I put just as much effort in designing patterns as what would be required for injection molding but I stop short of producing RTR models, else the retail price would far exceed $100 . each. If we lived in a perfect world, we'd be able to "dial up" some CAD program with an infinitely large library of parts, combine them in the mixture we want for our special XYZ-car or engine, send that info to a machine that would build the shell and underframe and spit it out either painted/lettered or unlettered for custom builders. All of this for $20. I doubt any of us in the "50+" crowd (I'm 50) will live long enough to see that happen so, in the meantime, let's be happy with the HUGE amount of offerings everyone has made available in just the past 5-7 years .. but also keep striving for better. That's just the American way! Jim King Smoky Mountain Model Works, Inc. <http://www.smokymountainmodelworks.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.64/2320 - Release Date: 08/22/09 18:04:00
|
|