Re: Railway Prototype Cyclopedia Vol. 19
barrybennetttoo <Barrybennetttoo@...>
Having used so-called 'galvanising paint' in the past I can state that the
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
stuff I used was a light metallic grey colour. I distinctly remember thinking to myself at the first time I used it 'this looks nothing like galvanised metal'. The colour, when it dried, was a shade or two darker than the typical colour we use for covered hoppers. In my minds eye I see a 3/4 photo of a covered hopper in young Mr Hawkins articles in Railmodel Journal which was described as being of a similar shade to that which I remeber. Barry Bennett Coventry, England.
-------Original Message-------
From: Ed Hawkins Date: 08/10/2009 05:18:58 To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: Railway Prototype Cyclopedia Vol. 19 On Oct 7, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Anthony Thompson wrote: Mark Feddersen wrote: Speaking of war emergency boxcars, does anybody know why Intermountain chose to paint the roof of their C&NW version gray? As far as I know they were the same box car red as the rest of the car and the Viking roofs were not galvanized. Can anybody shed some light on this or is this another Intermountain goof? I have no idea what color those C&NW roofs may have been, but I'd sure be surprised if the Viking roofing was not galvanized. That had been essentially standard since the 1920s and was extensively used even before WW I. Mark and Tony, The Viking roofs on the CNW emergency box cars were indeed galvanized. Also, I believe InterMountain made a good decision on the roof color based on available data (see below). InterMountain could have gone the easier route and painted the roof the same as the rest of the body. That would have eliminated a masking step and saved cost. Instead, IM masked the car so that the roof could be painted what is thought to be a legitimate color based on interpretation of source data by multiple people, including noted CNW freight car historian Jeff Koeller. I have the original bill of materials for the CNW cars built by Pullman-Standard having the Viking roofs. I scanned and sent a copy of the paint specs to both InterMountain and Jeff so they had actual documentation from which to base a decision. In the paint specifications it designates the outside of the roof and running boards as being painted with two coats of Sherwin-Williams #21572 or equal Galvanized Roof Paint. Naturally, the discussion then led to "OK, now what color is "galvanized roof paint?" Ultimately it was decided that the color should be a shade of gray somewhat matching that of the galvanized roof itself. Everyone is free to debate the conclusion, but the decision was made with a great deal of thought. The sides, ends, and trucks of the cars received CNW #1 paint "redish-brown in color." Underframes were coated with black car cement. White stencils. I have been known to criticize some of InterMountain's models when think the criticism is valid and deserved, In this case, IF a mistake in the roof color was made, I wouldn't characterize it "another InterMountain goof" since a great deal of discussion and thought went into the decision. The Viking Roof specification in Pullman-Standard lot no. 5752 called for roof sheets #16 U.S. Ga. C.B. Galvanized. Standard Railway Equipment Manufacturing Co. drawing 7R-2650-C. The P-S drawing list gives the general arrangement drawing no. 58215-C. It's quite possible this drawing is in the Pullman collection at the Illinois Railway Museum. At the same time AC&F built emergency box cars for CNW (and one car for CMO), and the bill of materials for the galvanized Murphy roofs on these cars specified them as unpainted. Hope this helps. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|