Re: B&O M55-b
Mark
Mr. Hawkins thank you for the clarification. Back to wonderment on this series of cars. Sure wish there was a drawing of the ends and roofs. The body is available and a duryea underframe can be built. Alas what we do to make them right.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Sincerely, Mark Morgan --- On Wed, 9/8/10, Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@...> wrote:
From: Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@...> Subject: Re: [STMFC] B&O M55-b To: STMFC@... Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 10:08 PM On Sep 8, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Mark M wrote: I mentioned in an earlier post about these cars. Have two photos and searched the messages and found post of USN fifty foot boxcars with similar ends and roof. Stan Rydarowicz has Carbuilders Flat 12 panel riveted roof for 1937 AAR boxcar. Does anyone know if these might be the right roof? Mark, Stan's flat-panel riveted roof was similar to but unlike the B&O M-55/A/B box cars, which had a rather unusual roof comprised of flat riveted sheets with depressed roof sheets adjacent to the ends. The purpose of the depression was to reduce the car's height near the edge of the latitudinal running board (i.e., the roof grab iron) to stay within clearance restrictions. An order of WLE box cars built in 1948 had the same type of roof. The depression in the roof sheet closest to each end was slightly wider than the latitudinal running board and 1-7/16" lower than if the roof extended straight to the ends without the depression. Regards, Ed Hawkins [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|