Re: Latest craftsman
water.kresse@...
Merry Christmas and a Healthy, Happy New Year Ted!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Al Kresse
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Culotta" <speedwitchmedia@gmail.com> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 11:33:50 AM Subject: [STMFC] Re: Latest craftsman I'm not dead yet! My first article in awhile is in the hands of RMC with more coming and I am looking at resuscitating some of the publishing projects. I also have a few new kit and decals efforts, too, plus restocks on old stuff in the near future (I do still have a few stray obligations on old kits and yes I know who all of you are.) Cheers, Ted Culotta
|
|
Re: Latest craftsman
Ted Culotta
I'm not dead yet! My first article in awhile is in the hands of RMC with more coming and I am looking at resuscitating some of the publishing projects. I also have a few new kit and decals efforts, too, plus restocks on old stuff in the near future (I do still have a few stray obligations on old kits and yes I know who all of you are.)
Cheers, Ted Culotta
|
|
Re: essential freight cars
al_brown03
The group Files section contains three listings of this series. The PDF called EssentialFreightCars45 is the most recent, and its listing is complete.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Barry Kenner" <hoboborr@...> wrote:
|
|
essential freight cars
Barry Kenner
Hello group,
With the recent mention of Ted Cullota's series Essential Freight Cars. I was wondering if their is available any type of compilation of these articles? Or is the only way to obtain the information ,is to get all of the back issues of RMC? I'm grateful for the information in the files section and the spread sheet. Thanks Barry
|
|
Re: Latest craftsman
I would love to have one but my railroads time stops at November 1952 and
these were rebuilt in 1955. They are really good looking. Like I said your modeling pushes me to get better. Bill Welch as well. fenton On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 11:22 PM, <cepropst@q.com> wrote: ** -- Fenton Wells 3047 Creek Run Sanford NC 27332 919-499-5545 srrfan1401@gmail.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: NYC Gondola
rdgbuff56
Lot 791G Â Â Photo Date: 6-23-70 Reading, Pa. Â Car has roof cover. Â Built 10-49 Â Greenville
Basically the LL Proto 2000 Gon with unusual scheme. Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. Sunbury, Pa. ________________________________ From: Brian Carlson <prrk41361@yahoo.com> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 11:17 PM Subject: RE: [STMFC] NYC Gondola  What date is the pic? Or reweigh date on the car? Brian J. Carlson, P.E. Cheektowaga, NY From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:15 PM To: NYC-Railroad@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] NYC Gondola On page 42 of the NYC color guide there is a picture of gondola NYC 749592. It appears to be painted silver. Does anybody know why? Sorry I can't find an on-line photo. Thanks! Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. Sunbury, Pa. [
|
|
Re: Latest craftsman
Clark Propst
I have sure learned alot more about those cars in that article since I made them. I'd like to sell the URTX reefer and have a repainted one too I'd like to be rid of.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I feel Ted did too uch too soon. I always warned him about burning out, but he blew up instead : / Clark Propst
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, O Fenton Wells <srrfan1401@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: NYC Gondola
What date is the pic? Or reweigh date on the car?
Brian J. Carlson, P.E. Cheektowaga, NY From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:15 PM To: NYC-Railroad@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] NYC Gondola On page 42 of the NYC color guide there is a picture of gondola NYC 749592. It appears to be painted silver. Does anybody know why? Sorry I can't find an on-line photo. Thanks! Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. Sunbury, Pa. [
|
|
Re: Shorpy and the A.T.&S.F
Michael Aufderheide
Gene,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Of the 22,350 box and auto cars on the Sante Fe at the time 14,450 were steel sheathed or 64.65%. If it weren't for the March photo date, I would wonder if many of the Bx-3, 11, 12, & 13s were busy in the plains states for the harvest. Regards, Mike Aufderheide
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Gene" <bierglaeser@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Latest craftsman
Thanks Clark, as a coincidence I was just re-reading your articles in Vol
one of Ted Culotta's Prototype Railroad Modeling magezine. Good stuff and very inspirational. I sure wish Ted could have continued this magazine. Thanks for the nice thoughts, fenton On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 6:29 PM, <cepropst@q.com> wrote: ** -- Fenton Wells 3047 Creek Run Sanford NC 27332 919-499-5545 srrfan1401@gmail.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
NYC Gondola
rdgbuff56
On page 42 of the NYC color guide there is a picture of gondola NYC 749592. Â It appears to be painted silver. Â Does anybody know why? Â Sorry I can't find an on-line photo.
Thanks! Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. Sunbury, Pa.
|
|
Latest craftsman
Clark Propst
I barrowed a copy of the latest Craftsman to read Fenton’s article. I noticed some very nicely weathered cars in the Accurail ad. So far I’ve just looked at Fenton’s photos. Looks like quite a project. Well done Fenton!!
Clark Propst Mason City Iowa [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Sunshine vinegar tank car
Pierre <pierre.oliver@...>
Denny,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The day I stop listening to good advice is the day I should hang up my Xacto knife. Thanks, Pierre Oliver
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, dennyanspach <danspach@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Sunshine vinegar tank car
dennyanspach <danspach@...>
Pierre, recognizing that you truly need no advice from me or just about anyone else in how to build models, Bill Darnaby's post on this list some years ago (#20484) and Ted Cullotta (#36207) on building this great car kit were, and still are, gold standards as to how two great modelers approached and completed successfully this extraordinary kit. I also contributed some working notes on the same kit in a post about three years ago (#86281 November 4, 2009).
The most important piece of advice that I learned from Bill, and then slavishly copied, was to deep-six the multitudinous brass wire tank bands, and the clunky process required to bend them, in favor of using nylon monofilament fishing line instead (easily secured with ACC). Although I used some line of the proper diameter found serendipitously wrapped around the propellor of my old ChrisCraft, I determined at the same time that lines of the same weight can have different diameters; so be careful (c. 8-13 lb. line, if I recall). A broomstick does indeed work in shaping the tank wrapper- for me much better than the PVC pipe included in the kit. Checking available prototype photos of these cars, the number of tank bands in the kit directions are fewer than the prototype. The ease of using the nylon line allowed me to replicate the correct prototype number. I substituted PSC handrail clamps for the ones supplied in the kit. The cast urethane "clamps" for the tank bands in the kit are also crude at best, but still presentable. If I am correct, however, I believe that Tichy has much better bands, which I would have used if I had known about them. The latter "may" also be predrilled, which if so, would void a lot of drilled finger tips. Denny Denny S. Anspach M Sacramento
|
|
Re: Again, Dry Ice
Google is your friend. Ask him.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Many posts cover car construction and where and how dry ice was made. Unless I missed a post, the question still remains of who received dry ice and for what purpose (other than Crystal Ice in metropolitan areas). My model RR is set during mid-WWII, 1942 � 1944. Do I need dry ice service cars?
|
|
Re: Again, Dry Ice
Brad Andonian
Rich yoder makes mathieson models and I am sure he can offer guidance
Brad andonian
|
|
Again, Dry Ice
Bill J.
Many posts cover car construction and where and how dry ice was made. Unless I missed a post, the question still remains of who received dry ice and for what purpose (other than Crystal Ice in metropolitan areas). My model RR is set during mid-WWII, 1942 – 1944. Do I need dry ice service cars?
Thanks, Bill J
|
|
Re: Shorpy and the A.T.&S.F
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Francis A. Pehowic, Jr. wrote:
Looking back, you are absolutely right on both accounts. Looking over too many photos today. Two of those tanks do seem to have unusually small domes.One exception to the "2% rule" was for cars which only carried water, since its expansion with temperature is so small. Santa Fe did have a fair fleet of tank cars in water service, and if restricted to that cargo only, could have had smaller domes. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Re: Shorpy and the A.T.&S.F
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote:
Regards, Otto
|
|
Re: Shorpy and the A.T.&S.F
Bill Daniels <billinsf@...>
Additionally, by 1944, Santa Fe was using large amounts of diesel fuel to fuel their fleet of FT locomotives, especially on the Arizona Division.
 Bill Daniels San Francisco, CA ________________________________ From: Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@opendoor.com> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Shorpy and the A.T.&S.F  On Dec 21, 2012, at 10:16 AM, David Henderson wrote: Found this on the Shorpy website. Thank you Jack Delano!A (typically) spectacular photo by Delano. However, the comment attached to the photo is seriously misleading. Barstow was a natural connecting point where Santa Fe cars were gathered for reassignment, since the Los Angeles, Arizona, and Valley divisions all terminated there. So most of the cars in the photo were not loads in trains but empties being sorted. Note, for example, the long string of empty ballast hoppers and gons. As for the tank cars, that's all locomotive fuel, some destined for Barstow while other cars were headed east to engine terminals on the Arizona division and north to engine terminals on the Valley division. It took a lot of bunker C to fuel all those steam locomotives. Though there were exceptions (e.g., solid reefer blocks), photos of most trains en route over Cajon Pass, Tehachapi Pass, passing through Needles, etc. typically show a proportion of foreign road to ATSF cars on the order of 3 to 1 or 4 to 1. Richard Hendrickson [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|