Re: Borden " Butter Dish" Chemical Tank cars White Only?
Charles Hladik
Ed,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That may have been the Steam Shack in Rutland, Vermont and probably made by New England Rail Service. Don Valentine should know and Mal Houck is probably correct. Chuck Hladik Rutland Railroad Virginia Division
In a message dated 7/12/2013 3:01:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ed_mines@... writes: A hobby shop in New England offered decals for the different colors of these cars. If I'm not mistaken they said there were also white and/or silver (aluminium) versions of these cars in addition to orange. Ed Mines --- In _STMFC@... (mailto:STMFC@...) , Indian640@... wrote: that Bord on a black frame.
|
|
Re: Borden " Butter Dish" Chemical Tank cars White Only?
ed_mines
A hobby shop in New England offered decals for the different colors of these cars. If I'm not mistaken they said there were also white and/or silver (aluminium) versions of these cars in addition to orange.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Ed Mines
--- In STMFC@..., Indian640@... wrote:
|
|
Re: CB&Q no. 73 truck
davesnyder59
Richard, is this Hi-Tech Details? The rubber airhose/mu people? Also went to your HO truck site that I have and drew a blank screen versus your normal PDF, are there problems? I went there because I remember another truck listed as Hi-Tech on your site, but Hi-Tech Details catalog lists no trucks. TIA.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Dave Snyder Louisville, Ky.
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CB&Q no. 73 truck
Richard Hendrickson
On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:14 AM, mumpseee <eric.mumper@...> wrote:
Group,Eric, those trucks are a 70 ton AAR self-aligning spring-plankless double truss design. You're right about the bolster end being wider; in fact, the whole trucks is bigger, 5'8" wheelbase as opposed to 5'6" on 50 ton trucks. No one makes an exact duplicate of that truck in HO scale, but the closest equivalent - and it's very close - is the ex-Red Caboose 70 ton Barber S-2 which is in the process of being improved and re-issued by Hi-Tech. It has the triangle snubber pockets inside the ends of the bolsters, which the Q truck does not, but those are subtle and in other respects it represents the Q trucks very well - spring arrangement, bolster end, etc. If you want to pursue getting these trucks in sizable numbers, e-mail me off-list and I'll give you contact information for Hi Tech. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
CB&Q no. 73 truck
Eric Mumper
Group,
Doing some research on CB&Q 70T cars built in the early 50s shows them riding on their no. 73 truck as shown in the picture on the link: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=765062 These trucks were under the ballast hoppers, offset triple hoppers, and 1958 cuft covered hoppers. To my mostly untrained eye, these look closest to the Proto2000 spring plankless, but the bolster on the 70T version looks wider. Is there a better HO scale choice for these? By the time I am done I will probably need 40 pairs of these and was hoping for something a little closer if possible. Maybe if this type of truck was common enough they could warrant production. Thanks. Eric Mumper eric.mumper@...
|
|
Re: Borden " Butter Dish" Chemical Tank cars White Only?
Malcolm H. Houck
Mal Houck Wrote:
"To my knowledge, they were at one time painted with a orange tank body on a black frame. Mal, Thanks for the Response, but the Orange or Red cars with Yellow lettering were for Milk Service. " Orange Car body Black frame Lettered: "The Borden Company Chemical Division" (left of access door) Reporting Marks - "BCDX 1006" "Tare 81820" Mal Houck
|
|
Re: Reefer Roundup revisited
Tony Thompson
Walt Cox wrote:
A secondary question was posed in the Reefer Roundup back in 2007 but does not seem to have been answered. It concerned what might have been the beginning of a prototypical model using an Athearn reefer and Details West 4/4 square dreadnaught ends.Whether this change was intended to model some specific prototype, I don't know. But if a PFE car is the goal, don't bother. The PFE class with that end was R-40-10, and InterMountain makes an excellent R-40-10 which has correct ends. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, tony@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Reefer Roundup revisited
Walter Cox
I have spent the evening searching the archives for useful information as
to collecting a representative collection of U. S. roadname (fruit and vegetable) refrigerator cars FGE, PFE, SFRX, ART? MDT? which would or could have run into Montreal and now have a pretty good Idea of what I'll need. My main problem now is which paint schemes available on the various models would be suitable for 1959. I am not interested in covering all possible cars, just what reasonably might have made it into Montreal. A secondary question was posed in the Reefer Roundup back in 2007 but does not seem to have been answered. It concerned what might have been the beginning of a prototypical model using an Athearn reefer and Details West 4/4 square dreadnaught ends. If anyone can shed any light on these issues it sure would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Walt
|
|
Fw: Atlas O Scale Trainman CPR 52' 6" Steel Flat Car Information
Earl Tuson
Is there anyone who might be able to help Andy with his question below? I don't believe he is on this list; please CC
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
him. Earl Tuson
1. Atlas O Scale Trainman CPR 52' 6" Steel Flat Car Information
|
|
Museum display engineering help
Gene <bierglaeser@...>
Could someone on the STMFC with appropriate engineering credentials help me design a rack to display 10 or 12 steam era freight car hand brakes for a museum display? Please contact me directly. Don't discuss on STMFC.
Gene Green
|
|
Re: 1923 NYC Box Cars
MDelvec952
Yes, you're right, Richard, all were delivered with Youngstown doors. I do have pictures of cars with five- and six-panel Superior doors, thought he six-panel doors are far more common.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks ....Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> To: STMFC <STMFC@...> Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 3:53 pm Subject: Re: [STMFC] 1923 NYC Box Cars On Jul 10, 2013, at 12:30 PM, MDelvec952@... wrote: I have good photos of these cars, ends, sides, roof and even the undersides. Lackawanna got 'em with both Youngstown and Superior doors and the cars wore all three DL&W paint schemes. They were not common after the 1960 Erie merger, and no pictures have surfaced of any painted for EL.One correction, Mike. All the cars were delivered with Youngstown corrugated doors. The Superior 6 panel doors didn't begin to replace the corrugated doors until the mid-1950s. Richard Hendrickson [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Borden " Butter Dish" Chemical Tank cars White Only?
James Fellows
You may want to try posting to the two milk train groups on yahoo. Neither
are very active, but once something is posted the reposes are generally pretty quick. Jim Fellows From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of erict1361 Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 8:55 AM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: Borden " Butter Dish" Chemical Tank cars White Only? Mal Houck Wrote: To my knowledge, they were at one time painted with a orange tank body on a black frame. Mal, Thanks for the Response, but the Orange or Red cars with Yellow lettering were for Milk Service. All, I did more research and did find a PSC Brass model on line painted Silver with a Black Frame in Chemical Division lettering. My concern is that this model has No End fins. As far as I know only the Top Fin part was removed from most all of the cars for the WW II war effort. I was only able to find Two Chemical Division Photos On Line. One in All White and One All Blue. So I am Not sure if this Silver car is correct or not? I found another interesting find, Some early car photos show valve piping and valves on both ends of the car, later photos so it only on the "B" end ? I assume these valves controled the release of the products from the tanks, not pressure since milk should not have expansion pressure. I do know that the First series cars had the Brake Wheel housing separate from the Tank and later builds had it mounted on the tank. Looks like Ureco, Ajax and Miner brakes were used. Eric Thur a black frame.
|
|
Re: Borden " Butter Dish" Chemical Tank cars White Only?
erict1361 <erict1361@...>
Mal Houck Wrote:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
To my knowledge, they were at one time painted with a orange tank body on a black frame. Mal, Thanks for the Response, but the Orange or Red cars with Yellow lettering were for Milk Service. All, I did more research and did find a PSC Brass model on line painted Silver with a Black Frame in Chemical Division lettering. My concern is that this model has No End fins. As far as I know only the Top Fin part was removed from most all of the cars for the WW II war effort. I was only able to find Two Chemical Division Photos On Line. One in All White and One All Blue. So I am Not sure if this Silver car is correct or not? I found another interesting find, Some early car photos show valve piping and valves on both ends of the car, later photos so it only on the "B" end ? I assume these valves controled the release of the products from the tanks, not pressure since milk should not have expansion pressure. I do know that the First series cars had the Brake Wheel housing separate from the Tank and later builds had it mounted on the tank. Looks like Ureco, Ajax and Miner brakes were used. Eric Thur
|
|
Re: Georgia & Florida Hoppers
Marty McGuirk
Thanks to all for the replies.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Marty
--- In STMFC@..., Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Borden " Butter Dish" Chemical Tank cars White Only?
Malcolm H. Houck
Would Anyone know if any of the "Butter Dish" Milk Tank cars that Borden
transferred from Milk hauling to Elmer's Glue hauling, "Chemical Division"Would Anyone know if any of the "Butter Dish" Milk Tank cars that Bord To my knowledge, they were at one time painted with a orange tank body on a black frame. Mal Houck
|
|
Re: Blue "Tank Car Connected" Sign
mrprksr <mrprksr@...>
Blue Flag....Rule 26 on most railroads doesn't have much bearing on the Canadian incident.....Blue Flags protect workers working on or about the cars that are protected by a blue flag....even engines being serviced on a fuel rack are normally blue flagged.....You cannot foul or block a blue flagged track and cannot couple to the cars beyond the blue flag.....only person who put up the blue flag or his foreman can take it back down....Often said that a Blue Flag is the most restricted signal.....You can get permission to pass a Red stop signal but not a Blue Flag......Larry
________________________________ From: Tony Thompson <tony@...> To: STMFC@... Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:33 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Blue "Tank Car Connected" Sign Richard Hendrickson wrote: Somewhere I've seen a photo of a blue sign attached to a tank car unloading track reading "Stop - Tank Car Connected" or something to that effect. But now, of course, I can't recall where. Can anyone on the list direct me to such a photo?One is in the email to you. Tony [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Blue "Tank Car Connected" Sign
Tony Thompson
John Sykes wrote:
That is one type of "Blue Flag" protection. Take a look here:Might be worth pointing out that these images are of OSHA-standard signs, long postdating this list. Before 1960, signs were different -- and not standard. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, tony@... Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Re: Blue "Tank Car Connected" Sign
Richard Hendrickson
On Jul 10, 2013, at 4:35 PM, John Sykes <John.Sykes@...> wrote:
Richard:Thanks, John. Richard
|
|
Re: Blue "Tank Car Connected" Sign
Richard Hendrickson
On Jul 10, 2013, at 4:35 PM, "John Sykes" <John.Sykes@...> wrote:
Richard:Thanks, John. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: Blue "Tank Car Connected" Sign
John
Richard:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That is one type of "Blue Flag" protection. Take a look here: http://www.aldonco.com -or- http://www.aldonco.com/products.aspx?sec=2&cat=114&subid=20 Lots of fun toys for the 12" to the foot railroad enthusiast. <VBG> John
--- In STMFC@..., Richard Hendrickson <rhendrickson@...> wrote:
|
|