Re: Twin Star Cars
I will chime in on what my thought process was when creating the part.
First I created it to work on the Kato 70 ton Roller bearing truck for converting the troop sleepers the Rock Island had. This works great. Second was the friction bearing version at the request of a list member. I have converted the friction bearing trucks provided in the Kato hopper kits. I have also done a set of Tahoe Bettendorf trucks. Im sorry I did not have an exact truck in mind for the friction trucks. I do machine a pocket to let the casting sit back in the side frame a bit on both styles. As a note a "bit" equals 0.020" Ross Dando
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Twin Star Cars
I had the same thought Andy - although I was thinking of using my Eastern Car Works Dalman sideframes. They are styrene, for one thing. Not Delrin.
On 2/23/2019 9:46 PM, Andy Carlson
wrote:
--
Tim O'Connor Sterling, Massachusetts
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: NKP 70000-70499
Ray Breyer
Hi Dave, No bulbs; these are drop end mill gons. There are just a couple of flat plates formed as needed to block the door from moving forward, and sandwiching the ends of the wood boards. As for the sides, you're right. The actual side sills are just hefty C channel behind the steel plate. Ray Breyer Elgin, IL
On Saturday, February 23, 2019, 4:19:32 PM CST, Dave Nelson <Lake_Muskoka@...> wrote:
I have only three photos on hand of the 1920’s era NKP 70000-70499, one of those gondolas that look like a flat car with an open top wood box set on it, held in place w/ side stakes.
My first question is about this feature: I expected to see a bulb angle on the top of the car sides, much as you would with an all steel gondola, but best I can tell from the three photos it looks like either no steel at all or perhaps a small L angle or possibly a small C Channel (if there is steel on the inside). By small I mean maybe 2-3 inches of descent from the top of the car side. Or possibly no steel at all. What is really there?
The other question is about what passes for the steel side sill. It appears to be a straight surface from the bottom of the floor to the lowest edge. There is a row of rivets about 2 inches from both top and bottom edge. This suggests to me that what one sees here as a large hunk of steel is just a thin web concealing the strong structural shapes behind it. Does that sound right?
Dave Nelson
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Interesting loads.
After seeing Eric Thur’s circuit breaker load at Cocoa Beach, I knew I wanted to do it “someday”. However, I was in vacation mode and even though I spent a lot of time with Eric I didn’t ask him where he got it. Thankfully, Ted noticed it too and wrote about it in his blog. He included a link to the sellers eBay store.
Ted’s blog post. http://prototopics.blogspot.com/2019/01/a-new-load-allis-chalmers-bzo-hv-oil.html?m=1 Well looking at the offerings I found two other industrial looking pieces that I thought would make nice loads. Both are labeled as part of a forging press. The upper one may become a load for the currently under construction F22. The smaller piece overhangs the deck so I might look for a wider deck flat. The pictures attached to this email show the loads on an F22 because I had it on the bench. There is very little cleanup required on the two pieces I received. I’m just going to paint these are steel casting color and create a load. Just thought others might be interested. Brian J. Carlson
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Twin Star Cars
Andy Carlson
Hi- I have thought that the TMW Dalman 2-level would be a good start, as the side frame has a wide spring area, which the Chrysler trucks also feature. I have not gone that far yet in testing this kitbash. -Andy Carlson Ojai CA
On Saturday, February 23, 2019, 5:36:08 PM PST, Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
Ed There is no "correct" truck for the Chrysler sideframe. Just use one that looks close. On 2/23/2019 6:26 PM, spsalso via Groups.Io wrote: > I've received my parts for the Chrysler truck conversion. The part > includes the shock absorber and two of the truck springs. It's > obvious that the part slides into a newly created void in the truck. > My question is: Which truck? > > I'd prefer not to guess. I assume the part was designed to fit a > particular model. So I'm asking which one. > > Edward Sutorik -- *Tim O'Connor* *Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: George Hook built the CV kits: Central Valley Rolling Stock Kits and Jack Parker
I met George once at a train show in White Plains. Bought a number of his wonderful passenger car trucks. Al Westerfield
On February 23, 2019, at 5:30 PM, Garth Groff <sarahsan@...> wrote: Andy and Friends, I had several of these kits when I was a teenager, and seem to remember that most of the cast metal parts were very similar to parts from other manufacturers such as Silver Streak. Did Mr. Hook cast his own, or did he source his metal parts from vendors? Some of these parts might still be available. Clover House used to sell similar metal parts, and Tichy has nicer parts in plastic. Duplicating the cars would not be difficult using Northeastern wood parts. Of course what is missing are the screens or masks for the lettering, as I doubt that any of these have survived. Some of the lettering is probably available from Clover House. Wood kits may not stack up to resin, but are fun to build. Rail Tales in Charlottesville ( http://www.railtalesva.com ) has a stack of untouched CV wood kits at bargain prices (as well as Ambroid, Silver Streak, Mainline and Ulrich). All you need is one CV car, since they were all pretty much alike. Yours Aye, Garth Groff
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Twin Star Cars
Ed
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There is no "correct" truck for the Chrysler sideframe. Just use one that looks close.
On 2/23/2019 6:26 PM, spsalso via Groups.Io wrote:
I've received my parts for the Chrysler truck conversion. The part includes the shock absorber and two of the truck springs. It's obvious that the part slides into a newly created void in the truck. My question is: Which truck? --
*Tim O'Connor* *Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Throwback Tuesday: MDC 50 ft SS Automobile Boxcars
mopacfirst
Somewhere, I don't recall on which thread, someone expressed surprise that there was a single door version. Big surprise to me too, but I could use a T&P version. Lo and behold, eBay came through. There was exactly one available amongst probably a dozen of the double door version.
Now the model I built at the time has 3-3 ends without a lumber door on the A end. So there must have been yet another variation. Unfortunately, the typical eBay listing only has one side photo, not enough to tell what the ends are. I too would love to have a technique for making the side grooves disappear. I wonder if ACC might fill them. My objective is a steel-sided rebuild. Ron Merrick
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Throwback Tuesday: MDC 50 ft SS Automobile Boxcars
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
Ken,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You are correct that most material on these cars seems to concentrate on the automobile versions. The cars built for lumber/general service get little mention. This includes John Ryczkowski's article in March 1995 MM. However, the general arrangement drawings for both types, and all the rebuilt variants can be found at https://www.wplives.com . All of the WP 50' SS boxcars had steel doors their whole lives. Yours Aye, Garth Groff
On 2/23/19 7:22 PM, Ken Adams wrote:
I just acquired one of the MDC kits #2118 lettered for the Illinois Central. It has the conventional ends with one end having a lumber door and wood double doors. This would have been fine on my early 1950's SP San Ramon branch converted back to WP as a lumber car inadvertently loaded for an SP destination. Shippers routing GN-WP-SN for SP delivery?
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: George Hook built the CV kits: Central Valley Rolling Stock Kits and Jack Parker
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
Andy and Friends,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I had several of these kits when I was a teenager, and seem to remember that most of the cast metal parts were very similar to parts from other manufacturers such as Silver Streak. Did Mr. Hook cast his own, or did he source his metal parts from vendors? Some of these parts might still be available. Clover House used to sell similar metal parts, and Tichy has nicer parts in plastic. Duplicating the cars would not be difficult using Northeastern wood parts. Of course what is missing are the screens or masks for the lettering, as I doubt that any of these have survived. Some of the lettering is probably available from Clover House. Wood kits may not stack up to resin, but are fun to build. Rail Tales in Charlottesville ( http://www.railtalesva.com ) has a stack of untouched CV wood kits at bargain prices (as well as Ambroid, Silver Streak, Mainline and Ulrich). All you need is one CV car, since they were all pretty much alike. Yours Aye, Garth Groff
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Throwback Tuesday: MDC 50 ft SS Automobile Boxcars
I just acquired one of the MDC kits #2118 lettered for the Illinois Central. It has the conventional ends with one end having a lumber door and wood double doors. This would have been fine on my early 1950's SP San Ramon branch converted back to WP as a lumber car inadvertently loaded for an SP destination. Shippers routing GN-WP-SN for SP delivery?
I reviewed both Train Model Journal articles from Richard Hendrickson in addition to the Resin Car works blogs and they are mostly concerned with the automobile loading versions and conversions. I did not see anything about the wood door lumber version and which roads actually used this car for lumber service. I thought the MDC originals were modeled from WP cars. The available Microscale decal set MC-4266 is for automobile cars too. I lack any real expertise in the WP even though I live close to the Antioch and Eastern/SN line and don't have the resources readily available to do detail investigation on their boxcar fleet. Eating too much octopus/calamari is my only excuse. Any information about the prototype lumber version of the MDC car and whether there was an actual WP car like it would be helpful. And would the MC-4266 decal set work. For rebuilding I am planning to replace the steps and roofwalk. For the ladders, I am going to try the technique of just carving out the rungs and replacing them with .010 plastic rod. Other grab irons would of course be replaced. Unless someone has come up with a method of minimizing the deep groves in the side boards, I will live with that. Ken Adams
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Twin Star Cars
spsalso
I've received my parts for the Chrysler truck conversion. The part includes the shock absorber and two of the truck springs. It's obvious that the part slides into a newly created void in the truck. My question is: Which truck?
I'd prefer not to guess. I assume the part was designed to fit a particular model. So I'm asking which one. Do you use a sprung truck, and remove the springs? Do you carve out some or all of the springs on a one-piece? Sounds like fun with Delrin. What should I do to use these parts? Ed Edward Sutorik
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: George Hook built the CV kits: Central Valley Rolling Stock Kits and Jack Parker
Richard Bale <Rhbale@...>
Jack Parker worked at Revell where he prepared tooling for all types of products including the ubiquitous Revell Engine House, which was designed by his co-worker Alan Armitage. In a 1995 interview Parker mentioned that Armitage specified used and broken bricks in his design which was initially rejected by his supervisor who thought the brickwork should be pristine. After several arguments Armitage was allowed to introduce selective aging, which Parker cut into the tooling.
Parker and Armitage -- a wonderfully talented pair who influenced model railroading many, lasting ways.
Richard Bale
In a message dated 2/21/2019 9:17:41 AM Pacific Standard Time, midcentury@... writes:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
NKP 70000-70499
Dave Nelson
I have only three photos on hand of the 1920’s era NKP 70000-70499, one of those gondolas that look like a flat car with an open top wood box set on it, held in place w/ side stakes.
My first question is about this feature: I expected to see a bulb angle on the top of the car sides, much as you would with an all steel gondola, but best I can tell from the three photos it looks like either no steel at all or perhaps a small L angle or possibly a small C Channel (if there is steel on the inside). By small I mean maybe 2-3 inches of descent from the top of the car side. Or possibly no steel at all. What is really there?
The other question is about what passes for the steel side sill. It appears to be a straight surface from the bottom of the floor to the lowest edge. There is a row of rivets about 2 inches from both top and bottom edge. This suggests to me that what one sees here as a large hunk of steel is just a thin web concealing the strong structural shapes behind it. Does that sound right?
Dave Nelson
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: freight cars being scrapped in 1947
Michael Gross
I think we're very definitely in Santa Fe territory here: in addition to the plated end car already identified, in other photos I see what looks like one intact Caswell gondola, another in the process of disassembly, and numerous ATSF wooden work cars recycled from DS box cars.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: freight cars being scrapped in 1947
tyesac@aol.com <tyesac@...>
John.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Looks like you've got it! The other cars that are interesting are those having ends made from Murphy gondola ends mounted vertically.
Tom Casey
-----Original Message-----
From: John Barry <northbaylines@...> To: main <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2019 6:51 am Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] freight cars being scrapped in 1947 Tom,
I agree that this was likely not a reefer, but its also likely not a(n) (un)rebuilt furniture car.
It has a faded A.T.S.F. MoW number that I read as 196825, it also has a partial faded number below the work series number that I read as 382.
The three vertically joined end panels, lack of brake step, vertical brake shaft, grab iron end ladder, and single panel on the side are all consistent with the as built configuration of the Bx-Z. The dark (black?) lettering on a light (grey?) carbody are also indicative of non-revenue service. The style of the ATSF with periods but no ampersand date the re-paint/re-stencil to 1938-1943.
I would say that it was likely that the car was retired from MoW service and scrapped as A.T.S.F. Wx-Z 196825.
John Barry
ATSF North Bay Lines
Golden Gates & Fast Freights
Lovettsville, VA
707-490-9696
PO Box 44736
Washington, DC 20026-4736
On Friday, February 22, 2019, 8:25:48 PM EST, tyesac@... via Groups.Io <tyesac@...> wrote:
Bill,
The two SFRD Rr-19's with flat plate steel ends were made with two steel sheets and joined with a single horizontal seam. Also, those had AJAX hand brakes and the end reporting marks would be "SFRD" instead of "AT&SF". The twisted visible roof framing, the "Y" looking parts, imply this could be an older Fe- class car that hand been rebuilt.
Tom Casey
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Vaughn via Groups.Io <atsfmodlr@...> To: main <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Sent: Fri, Feb 22, 2019 5:42 pm Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] freight cars being scrapped in 1947 Tim I don't think so the 1947 picture shows a ladder where your picture shows grab irons. Also I believe both Rr-19 with flat ends lasted more that 11 years from rebuilding.
Bill Vaughn
On Friday, February 22, 2019, 3:38:33 PM PST, Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
an Rr-19 perhaps? On 2/22/2019 5:33 PM, David via Groups.Io wrote: > Would anyone have a guess what this car was? The other cars are Pere > Marquette USRA ds box derivatives, but this one is Santa Fe? > > https://www.facebook.com/Radio.WW2/photos/a.1995435020702484/1995435100702476/?type=3&theater > > > David Thompson -- *Tim O'Connor* *Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: freight cars being scrapped in 1947
John Barry
Tom, I agree that this was likely not a reefer, but its also likely not a(n) (un)rebuilt furniture car. It has a faded A.T.S.F. MoW number that I read as 196825, it also has a partial faded number below the work series number that I read as 382. The three vertically joined end panels, lack of brake step, vertical brake shaft, grab iron end ladder, and single panel on the side are all consistent with the as built configuration of the Bx-Z. The dark (black?) lettering on a light (grey?) carbody are also indicative of non-revenue service. The style of the ATSF with periods but no ampersand date the re-paint/re-stencil to 1938-1943. I would say that it was likely that the car was retired from MoW service and scrapped as A.T.S.F. Wx-Z 196825. John Barry ATSF North Bay Lines Golden Gates & Fast Freights Lovettsville, VA 707-490-9696 PO Box 44736 Washington, DC 20026-4736
On Friday, February 22, 2019, 8:25:48 PM EST, tyesac@... via Groups.Io <tyesac@...> wrote:
Bill,
The two SFRD Rr-19's with flat plate steel ends were made with two steel sheets and joined with a single horizontal seam. Also, those had AJAX hand brakes and the end reporting marks would be "SFRD" instead of "AT&SF". The twisted visible roof framing, the "Y" looking parts, imply this could be an older Fe- class car that hand been rebuilt.
Tom Casey
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Vaughn via Groups.Io <atsfmodlr@...> To: main <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Sent: Fri, Feb 22, 2019 5:42 pm Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] freight cars being scrapped in 1947 Tim I don't think so the 1947 picture shows a ladder where your picture shows grab irons. Also I believe both Rr-19 with flat ends lasted more that 11 years from rebuilding.
Bill Vaughn
On Friday, February 22, 2019, 3:38:33 PM PST, Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
an Rr-19 perhaps? On 2/22/2019 5:33 PM, David via Groups.Io wrote: > Would anyone have a guess what this car was? The other cars are Pere > Marquette USRA ds box derivatives, but this one is Santa Fe? > > https://www.facebook.com/Radio.WW2/photos/a.1995435020702484/1995435100702476/?type=3&theater > > > David Thompson -- *Tim O'Connor* *Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Proctor & Gamble Tank Cars
Garth Groff <sarahsan@...>
Friends,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
P&G also has a large plant near Sacramento which used to produce "synthetic granules", meaning powdered laundry detergent such as Tide. I had the chance to tour the factory in my boyhood (factory tours are largely a thing of the past!). The Sacramento facility produced or used a lot of glycerine, which I learned had a potential wartime role in making explosives. The facility was switched by the Central California Traction Co. and the SP. Today that would be the UP. Getting off topic a bit, but the Los Angeles Soap Company had a plant which made a brand called White King D, the first granulated detergent. They sponsored "Queen for a Day" on radio and TV for years. The company went out of business in 1987. When I drove a truck in LA after college I used to go past the plant, and though I carried a camera I never took a photo. Yours Aye, Garth Groff
On 2/22/19 6:06 PM, G.J. Irwin wrote:
Actually, Palmolive Soap was a product of the Colgate-Palmolive Company, a key P&G rival. One of the well-known C-P plants was walking distance from my boyhood home in Jersey City, New Jersey... served by classic street trackage south of the PRR's Exchange Place station. I have a couple of photos of tank cars parked at the plant.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: Proctor & Gamble Tank Cars
Ted Culotta
Ummmm.... Palmolive is made by Colgate-Palmolive. That’s akin to talking about the IPhone from Samsung.
Ted Culotta Speedwitch Media
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Re: freight cars being scrapped in 1947
tyesac@aol.com <tyesac@...>
Bill,
The two SFRD Rr-19's with flat plate steel ends were made with two steel sheets and joined with a single horizontal seam. Also, those had AJAX hand brakes and the end reporting marks would be "SFRD" instead of "AT&SF". The twisted visible roof framing, the "Y" looking parts, imply this could be an older Fe- class car that hand been rebuilt.
Tom Casey
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Vaughn via Groups.Io <atsfmodlr@...> To: main <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Sent: Fri, Feb 22, 2019 5:42 pm Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] freight cars being scrapped in 1947 Tim I don't think so the 1947 picture shows a ladder where your picture shows grab irons. Also I believe both Rr-19 with flat ends lasted more that 11 years from rebuilding.
Bill Vaughn
On Friday, February 22, 2019, 3:38:33 PM PST, Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
an Rr-19 perhaps? On 2/22/2019 5:33 PM, David via Groups.Io wrote: > Would anyone have a guess what this car was? The other cars are Pere > Marquette USRA ds box derivatives, but this one is Santa Fe? > > https://www.facebook.com/Radio.WW2/photos/a.1995435020702484/1995435100702476/?type=3&theater > > > David Thompson -- *Tim O'Connor* *Sterling, Massachusetts*
|
||||||||||
|