|
Close-out freight car parts offered FS
Andy Carlson
I have the following parts offered for sale. All are new HO. Prices do not include shipping. Several items are in limited supply. Red Caboose X29 undeframe with AB brake details (this sprue has 2 AB brake sets) $1/each X29 Creco style 3 panel doors $0.75/pair X29 4/5/4 Youngstown steel door $0.75/pair X29 wood running boards w/ laterals $0.75/each X29 roofs $0.50/each '37 AAR Murphy rectangular raised panel 40' roof $2.75/each 6' wide 5-panel Superior door 10'6" IH $2/pair 6' wide 5/6/6 Improved Youngstown Door 10'6" IH $2.50/pair These I feel are HO's best version of this common door SUPERIOR Power Brake set $3/each South West Scale doors #750 7' wide 5-panel Superior door for 10'6" IH car $2/pair #610 6' wide 5/5/5 "Overnight" interim improved YSD for 10'0" IH $2/pair #622 6' wide 6/6/5 "Upside Down" improved Youngstown door $2.50/pair #770 7' Wide even space 7-panel Superior door 10'6" IH $2/pair #672 6' wide even space 7-panel Superior door 10'6" IH $2/pair #673 6' wide wide 3rd 7-panel Superior door 10'6" IH $2/pair #650 6' wide 5-panel Superior door 10'6" IH $2/pair Intermountain 5/6/6 Improved 6' wide Youngstown steel door $2/pair 5/6/5-T pre-war Youngstown 6' wide door 10'6" IH $2/pair Improved Dreadnaught 3/4 "rolling Pin" end $2/pair Improved Dreadnaught thin+3/4 "rollinPin"no pole pocket $2/pair PACEMAKER Dreadnaught thin+3/4 end w/ poling pockets $3/pair 6' wide even space Superior door 10'0" IH $2/pair 4/5 early Dreadnaught 4/5 ends 10'0" IH $2.50/pair 8-rung ladders for 10'0" IH $2.50/set Apex etched metal running boards for 40' box car $3/each Buyer to pay $4 and up for USPS shipping by padded envelope 1st class mail. I accept checks and money orders. With a small fee PayPal is accepted. contact me off-list (Please) for availability and your shipping questions at <midcentury@...> Thanks, -andy Carlson
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Swift Reefers
Dave Parker
Steve and group:
I spent a fair bit of time trying to sort out the three series of wooden Swift reefers that were covered by the three variations in the Sunshine kits -- the 2500, 5200, and 6700 series, all of which are referenced in Martins Feb 1993 article. My goal was simply to understand the genesis of these three series to facilitate accurate modeling, so I did not really delve into other significant groups such as the 3300-5199 series. I relied mostly on my collection of ORERs that tend to be in ~5-year increments (1926, 1930, 1935, 1940, 1945, 1954). ANAICT, the 5200 series dates to about 1931-32, and retained its original numbers into the 1950s. Some very similar cars appear in the ORERs in the same period: the 500-699 series that appears in Martin's tabulation, and the 1900-2499 series that does not (presumably due to renumbering). The 5200 series doesn't appear in my ORERs until 1945, and may have been closely related to the 3300-5199 series, Martin attributed these cars to the "late" 1920s, and my best guess is that the were originally numbered in 17400-19999. The 6700 series purportedly dates to the mid-1920s, but again these numbers don't appear until 1945. I had a lot of trouble backtracking this group through the ORERs, and really couldn't identify a likely series for these cars prior to 1930. In the 1935 and 1940 registers, these cars may have been in 12700-15799. My experience suggests that It will not be easy to construct an accurate time-line for the Swift roster, especially if the ORERs are the principle source of the data. I have a few photo that help a bit, but am not aware of any company records that would shed better light. Hopes this helps. -- Dave Parker Swall Meadows, CA
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Dave Parker
ARA interchange rule 30 called for reweighing whenever a car was "materially changed by repair, alterations or repainting". This applied to tank cars even though they were not subject to regular, period reweighing.
It's hard to imagine how repainting a tank car would significantly change the light weight (which was always rounded to nearest 100 lbs), and the Rule 30 language implies some discretion as to what a "material" change in weight might be. My guess is that reweighing of tank cars were most frequently triggered by a swapping out of the trucks, Until the mid-1920s, all tank cars were delivered with arch-bar or (less commonly) Andrews trucks. These were eventually replaced with CSF trucks, either by rule (arch-bar) or due to owner preference (Andrews). Other significant alterations likely included the addition of heating coils. In their 1921 All About Tank Cars book, the Standard Tank Car Company indicates that the addition of steam coils added 1000 lbs to the weight of the car. Conversion from KC or (KD) brakes to ABs is also an alteration that likely changed the light weight. In addition to the changes in hardware and plumbing, alterations to the frame were needed to secure the three components of the AB system. In some instances, these alterations might have been made concurrently, and perhaps in concert with more subtle "tweaks" to the tank car bodies (e.g., manway covers, safety placard holders, running boards, etc.) My view is that whether or not a tank had been reweighed depended both on when it was built and when it was photographed. A 1927 AC&F build might not have undergone any significant alterations until the AB brakes were applied, perhaps 25 years later. But a similar car built three years prior would have needed new trucks to comply with the 1940 arch-bar ban. There are many other scenarios that would have dictated exactly when a new light-weight would need to have been stenciled onto the car. -- Dave Parker Swall Meadows, CA
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Swift Reefers
Tony Thompson
Yeah, there’s some fool publisher that keeps doing reefer books.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Tony Thompson
On Oct 11, 2019, at 4:51 PM, Roger Huber via Groups.Io <trainpainter@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Swift Reefers
Nelson Moyer
And don’t forget the SFRD book recently reprinted by the Santa Fe Railway Historical and Modeling Society.
Nelson Moyer
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io]
On Behalf Of Roger Huber via Groups.Io
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 10:52 AM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Swift Reefers
Sounds like some adventurous soul needs to get going on a book about the Swift cars. We have books on the PFE, ART and MDT reefers so now it's time for the Swift cars!
Roger Huber Deer Creek Locomotive Works
On Friday, October 11, 2019, 09:10:49 AM CDT, Joseph <Mstl852@...> wrote:
It would be interesting to collate this info with build dates. I realize this is the minefield, what with rebuildings and later acquisitions. Paint scheme data is helpful
Thanks for posting
Joe Binish
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:53 AM Douglas Harding <doug.harding@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
s shaffer
I would hope that $28.95 gets you a ready to roll car with metal couplers and wheels at least. I bought a four pack of Branchline Yardmaster Linde boxcars on ebay for $34 with shipping. I think Branchline was good about correct paint lettering.
I built one of the kits. No end door or vent modifications. Rolled and taped a piece of paper then wrapped it with flat side out aluminum foil and put in the box. Run it at the club with the one door just a bit open so the tank can be seen. Steve Shaffer Las Cruces, New Mexico
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Swift Reefers
Roger Huber
Sounds like some adventurous soul needs to get going on a book about the Swift cars. We have books on the PFE, ART and MDT reefers so now it's time for the Swift cars! Roger Huber Deer Creek Locomotive Works
On Friday, October 11, 2019, 09:10:49 AM CDT, Joseph <Mstl852@...> wrote:
It would be interesting to collate this info with build dates. I realize this is the minefield, what with rebuildings and later acquisitions. Paint scheme data is helpful Thanks for posting Joe Binish On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:53 AM Douglas Harding <doug.harding@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [RealSTMFC] Swift Reefers
Gatwood, Elden J SAD
Interesting data, for your Swift cars
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Douglas Harding Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 9:54 AM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [RealSTMFC] Swift Reefers Steve, Martin included a roster of Swift cars in his 2-93 article. That is the only list I recall ever seeing, beyond notes in Gene Green's Color reefer book. There was list of Swift cars in the 7-93 RMJ, listing cars seen and photographed in 1935. The author also makes reference to a list published in the 4-93 issue of RMJ. Alas the TrianLife database is not cooperating this morning, so I'm not able to confirm what was in the 4-93 issue. Doug Harding Blockedwww.iowacentralrr.org From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Steve and Barb Hile Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 2:51 PM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: [RealSTMFC] Swift Reefers Has anyone published any sort of detailed roster of Swift reefers? I seem to think so, but can't locate such. I do have Martin Lofton's RMJ 2-93 article. Maybe a good clinic session? Thanks in advance, Steve Hile
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Swift Reefers
Joseph
It would be interesting to collate this info with build dates. I realize this is the minefield, what with rebuildings and later acquisitions. Paint scheme data is helpful Thanks for posting Joe Binish
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:53 AM Douglas Harding <doug.harding@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Swift Reefers
Steve, Martin included a roster of Swift cars in his 2-93 article. That is the only list I recall ever seeing, beyond notes in Gene Green’s Color reefer book. There was list of Swift cars in the 7-93 RMJ, listing cars seen and photographed in 1935. The author also makes reference to a list published in the 4-93 issue of RMJ. Alas the TrianLife database is not cooperating this morning, so I’m not able to confirm what was in the 4-93 issue.
Doug Harding www.iowacentralrr.org
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [mailto:main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Steve and Barb Hile
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 2:51 PM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io Subject: [RealSTMFC] Swift Reefers
Has anyone published any sort of detailed roster of Swift reefers? I seem to think so, but can't locate such. I do have Martin Lofton's RMJ 2-93 article.
Maybe a good clinic session?
Thanks in advance, Steve Hile
|
||
|
|
||
|
New kits from YMW
Pierre Oliver
It's Friday, time for announcements
https://elgincarshops.blogspot.com/2019/10/and-here-they-are.html These kits will be on the website after the Chicagoland RPM -- Pierre Oliver www.elgincarshops.com www.yarmouthmodelworks.com
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Agreed! And our models should absolutely reflect this.
Bruce Smith
temporarily in Birmingham, Al
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Tony Thompson <tony@...>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 4:14 AM To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@realstmfc.groups.io> Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car) No argument in general, but one point to keep in mind is that even when there is a reweigh date, it may be MANY years prior to the photo date, implying it was a repair date, not periodic reweigh. There are lots of those in Richard’s collection.
Tony Thompson
On Oct 11, 2019, at 12:12 AM, Bruce Smith <smithbf@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Eric,
Yes, and repairs as well. Repainting could potentially be included in that list as well, but I have also seen many photos of tank cars that were obviously repainted, but had earlier reweigh (or NEW) dates.
Regards,
Bruce Smith
temporarily located in Birmingham, Al
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Eric Hansmann <eric@...>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 5:47 AM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car) Could a tank car reweigh date reflect some sort of upgrade to the car, like a new tank?
Eric Hansmann
On October 11, 2019 at 3:14 AM Tony Thompson <tony@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Eric Hansmann
Could a tank car reweigh date reflect some sort of upgrade to the car, like a new tank? Eric Hansmann
On October 11, 2019 at 3:14 AM Tony Thompson <tony@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Tony Thompson
No argument in general, but one point to keep in mind is that even when there is a reweigh date, it may be MANY years prior to the photo date, implying it was a repair date, not periodic reweigh. There are lots of those in Richard’s collection.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Tony Thompson
On Oct 11, 2019, at 12:12 AM, Bruce Smith <smithbf@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Tony,
While I don't have Richard's collection at hand, I have looked through the photos I have and counted "new" versus "reweigh" stencils. The ones that are obviously reweighs outnumber the "new" by 61 to 36. I probably looked at around 250 photos.
Some caveats:
-I did not count builder's photos, only photos that were clearly "in service."
-reweigh cars were cars where the Lt Wt did not match either the build date or the tank test
date
- new cars were cars where the Lt Wt did match either the build date or tank test date - the photos range across many years and types of tank cars -a reasonable number of cars did not seem to show any date with the Lt Wt. -The majority (~2/3) of the "new" cars were not stenciled "NEW" but rather had no stencil or stencils such as MILT (and you know where that is 😉) Interestingly, AC&F builder's photos show either MILT or NEW. My take-home is that my statement could be revised to "a majority have reweigh data", but I am tempted to note that since a number of the "new" photos were of clearly new cars in service, that would bias the count so that over their lifetimes, "most" might
indeed be correct.
Regards,
Bruce
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Tony Thompson <tony@...>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 4:10 PM To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@realstmfc.groups.io> Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car) ALL tank cars, including Linde Tank Cars, would have weight data and most would have reweigh data.
Nope. Plenty of tank cars had their NEW weight decades after being built. I don’t agree that even “most “ had reweigh. There are thousands of tank car images in the Hendrickson collection, so I am not making this up.
And BTW class XT car were still billed by gallonage, so no real reason to reweigh.
Tony Thompson
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Ben de Vries
Thank you Staffan, that saves me money!
Ben
From: Staffan Ehnbom
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 8:52 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’
boxcars The GN car: Foobie! Nothing seems right but wheels and couplers.
Accurail came closer 30 years ago except a fish belly side sill needing
straightening and an overhanging diagonal panel roof to be exchanged. See
attachment.
Staffan Ehnbom On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:13 AM Ben de Vries
<bernjuldevries@...> wrote:
Can anyone of you review the prototype fidelity of subj. cars, especially the Linde
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars
Ben de Vries
Ben,
thank you, I know now that I should avoid these models!
Ben
From: Benjamin
Hom
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2019 4:03 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’
boxcars Ben de Vries asked:
"Can anyone of you review the prototype fidelity of subj. cars, especially
the Linde and GN car? I would like to avoid buying foobies!"
Bill Welch replied:
"A link would be helpful Ben. . ."
We've discussed these models before in the thread "Bowser Box Cars"
starting with message #143056 dated 6/15/16. Long story short, this model
has been lurking around the Bowser catalog for the last 15-20 years or so in the
guise of base model "canvas" for custom-decorated cars in their English Model
Railroad Supply line. Bowser used their Class X31A single door boxcar
tooling as the basis for a "generic" 40 ft boxcar, creating a model with a
Murphy rectangular panel roof with 4/5 Dreadnaught ends but with the side rivet
patterns of the Class X31A single door car, all the way down to the unique 5
panels to the left of the door/4 panels to the right of the door.
I've got one of these models, but haven't discovered any prototype for it
yet as this combination of features is unusual, so all of the decorated models
are suspect. Frankly, $28.95 is a bit much to shell out for a stand-in
model.
Ben Hom
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Tony Thompson
ALL tank cars, including Linde Tank Cars, would have weight data and most would have reweigh data. Nope. Plenty of tank cars had their NEW weight decades after being built. I don’t agree that even “most “ had reweigh. There are thousands of tank car images in the Hendrickson collection, so I am not making this up. And BTW class XT car were still billed by gallonage, so no real reason to reweigh. Tony Thompson
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Fidelity Bowser 40’ boxcars (Linde Tank Car)
Jack Mullen
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:11 AM, Bruce Smith wrote:
So, while the first part of Bob’s statement is fine, the second is completely false and does not derive from the first. ALL tank cars, including Linde Tank Cars, would have weight data and most would have reweigh data.As I read Bob's conjecture, he's not saying that tank cars wouldn't have weight data, just that they "shouldn't" have REweigh dates and revised weights. Not completely false, but an overstatement. I think the premise may actually be what's incorrect - these cars are classed as XT which is a box car class, not a T_ tank car. I'd expect the normal boxcar reweighing requirement would apply. Jack Mullen
|
||
|
|
