Re: PRR Stock cars on Southern Pacific or Union Pacific tracks?
David North
I checked Bowser for HO models of the K11 stock cars and they have two paint schemes. One is all Tuscan and the other is Tuscan with a galvanised? roof and doors. Are either or both these variations suitable for 1954? Cheers Dave
|
|
Re: ACL low sided gondolas
Paul Doggett
Thomas
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I have just finished the K7 the decals were absolutely awful, thank you for your help. Paul
On 5 Feb 2020, at 15:24, thomas christensen via Groups.Io <thomasjonly@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: High and Wide ops was D&H Flat
Your guess is as good as mine, Tim, But certainly plausible.
Thanks!
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...>
On 2/8/2020 6:35 PM, BRIAN PAUL EHNI wrote:
--
Tim O'Connor Sterling, Massachusetts
|
|
Re: High and Wide ops was D&H Flat
Outstanding that you caught that train Brian! The spaced out loads may have had something to do with bridge loading limits, perhaps?
On 2/8/2020 6:35 PM, BRIAN PAUL EHNI wrote:
--
Tim O'Connor Sterling, Massachusetts
|
|
Re: High and Wide ops was D&H Flat
I once saw a train on the SP Houston-Dallas line that had 6 heavy duty flat cars at the head of the train. They were separated from each other by boxcars, and each had a large electrical transformer. Here’s a shot of one; N&W 70182, plus three together.
Thanks!
From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Bruce Smith <smithbf@...>
Dan,
Precisely! While large loads could be moved in regular freights, "high and wide" loads often required special handling and therefore were often accumulated and moved in a single train. On the stretch of the PRR I model, the Columbia and Port Deposit branch, from Perryville MD, through Columbia PA and on to Enola, this H&W train was typically run on Sunday morning. That makes sense as it was the lightest traffic day of the week, and therefore the low speed and occasional stops to check clearance wouldn't mess up the rest of the railroad. There was also a spot at "Midway siding" where the tracks were set farther apart, to allow H&W trains to pass each other. i plan too accumulate a train of H&W loads and then run it once every 10-14 ops sessions.
Regards, Bruce Bruce Smith Auburn, AL
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Daniel A. Mitchell <danmitch@...>
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 2:50 PM To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] D&H Flat
Not now. I have a strange appreciation of heavy duty flat cars and their often interesting loads. I just haven’t gotten around to this one yet, perhaps because I’ve not seen a photo of the prototype and whatever load it might be carrying. One has to be careful mixing such cars into regular train (assuming they’re not a “high and wide”). Too many looks strange. On the other hand I’ve seen photos of whole trains of high and wide oversized loads. Perhaps that’s putting all one’s problems in one place?
Dan Mitchell
|
|
High and Wide ops was D&H Flat
Dan,
Precisely! While large loads could be moved in regular freights, "high and wide" loads often required special handling and therefore were often accumulated and moved in a single train. On the stretch of the PRR I model, the Columbia and Port Deposit branch,
from Perryville MD, through Columbia PA and on to Enola, this H&W train was typically run on Sunday morning. That makes sense as it was the lightest traffic day of the week, and therefore the low speed and occasional stops to check clearance wouldn't mess
up the rest of the railroad. There was also a spot at "Midway siding" where the tracks were set farther apart, to allow H&W trains to pass each other. i plan too accumulate a train of H&W loads and then run it once every 10-14 ops sessions.
Regards,
Bruce
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Daniel A. Mitchell <danmitch@...>
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 2:50 PM To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] D&H Flat Not now. I have a strange appreciation of heavy duty flat cars and their often interesting loads. I just haven’t gotten around to this one yet, perhaps because I’ve not seen a photo of
the prototype and whatever load it might be carrying. One has to be careful mixing such cars into regular train (assuming they’re not a “high and wide”). Too many looks strange. On the other hand I’ve seen photos of whole trains of high and wide oversized
loads. Perhaps that’s putting all one’s problems in one place?
Dan Mitchell
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Hello Dan and to others in the group,
This is a link to a load offered by MultiScale Digital, https://www.ebay.com/itm/HO-Scale-Mesta-Huge-Forging-Press-Ram-Beam-Flat-Car-Load-Model-Railroad/303473590443?hash=item46a86f80ab:g:b~wAAOSwjCxeOc4j Scroll to bottom for a photo of load on a PRR F38. Very cool. Mark puts in service shots into his listings so take a look at others. I am a satisfied customer too. New loads coming out at a fair rate. And the Peacock brake wheel used on these PRR cars.Rare and distinctive. Dan Smith
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Bruce:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That’s the first photo of the D&H 12-axle car I’ve seen, Thanks! I did miss the start of this thread, so was not aware of the previous discussion on the 8-axle D&H car. When I “arrived” the discussion was heavy on the ECW model car, and that’s when I started getting in on it. Thanks again, Dan Mitchell ==========
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Not now. I have a strange appreciation of heavy duty flat cars and their often interesting loads. I just haven’t gotten around to this one yet, perhaps because I’ve not seen a photo of the prototype and whatever load it might be carrying. One has to be careful mixing such cars into regular train (assuming they’re not a “high and wide”). Too many looks strange. On the other hand I’ve seen photos of whole trains of high and wide oversized loads. Perhaps that’s putting all one’s problems in one place?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Dan Mitchell ==========
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Dave Boss
Hello, and thanks for all your help on this car. I think I'll message Steve at F&C maybe it's in the works ? Dave
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:06 PM Bruce Smith <smithbf@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Dan (other Dan),
Thanks. Interesting. Definitely NOT the D&H flat car that started this discussion though 😉 Obviously, I was unaware that ECW did this and frankly the kit was so problematic that I was happy to stick with my brass F38. It would appear from the instructions
that there were a significant number of 36' deck variants of this car beyond D&H that this kit could also model.
The modified kit does appear to be prototypical for D&H 16157 (not D&H 16153)
Regards,
Bruce Smith
Auburn
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Dan Smith <espeefan@...>
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 11:56 AM To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] D&H Flat All,
An ECW 4700 sold on ebay a while ago, here is the link to that sold listing. Take a look and it shows the instructions well. You can see the 2 build versions that can be done. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Eastern-Car-Works-Heavy-Duty-Cars-Pennsylvania-F-38-4700-Undecorated-/303433667393?hash=item46a60e5341%3Ag%3Au24AAOSwWxxeEknn&nma=true&si=jM4eChH7Do6CPgEAYYSAj931zhg%253D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 Dan Smith
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
All,
An ECW 4700 sold on ebay a while ago, here is the link to that sold listing. Take a look and it shows the instructions well. You can see the 2 build versions that can be done. https://www.ebay.com/itm/Eastern-Car-Works-Heavy-Duty-Cars-Pennsylvania-F-38-4700-Undecorated-/303433667393?hash=item46a60e5341%3Ag%3Au24AAOSwWxxeEknn&nma=true&si=jM4eChH7Do6CPgEAYYSAj931zhg%253D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 Dan Smith
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Bob Webber
What, you think the Olds grill is a bit out of
comparison? The algorithms for determining "similarity"
have always needed tweaking. OTOH, the Gon is in the same basic
category....
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
At 11:05 AM 2/8/2020, you wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 09:33 AM, Bob Webber wrote:
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Dan,
You may have missed it, but this entire thread was started with respect to D&H 16153. Dave Boss asked "Does
anyone know if there was ever a D&H #16153 250 ton four truck flat car model available...?". Francis then replied that there was an ECW kit
of that car. At no point was the thread NOT in reference to D&H 16153. I suggest that you use the links at the bottom of this message and see that for yourself.
And no, ECW 4700 is the PRR F38
Finally, the photo in your email comes from a Model Railroad Hobbyist blog, where the author (not you), states that he is using the F38 kit to model two flats, one the PRR F38 and a second, SOUTHERN 50099 (no D&H mentioned) a flat with a shorter deck that he
is BASHING from the F38. https://model-railroad-hobbyist.com/node/24094 I even did a Google image search with the photo from your message and the only thing it brought up was the
MRH thread. I can find no sign of the photo you attached on eBay.
Regards,
Bruce Smith
Auburn, Al
From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Daniel A. Mitchell <danmitch@...>
Sent: Saturday, February 8, 2020 10:20 AM To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] D&H Flat Nope!
I’m no D&H expert. I was referring to the ECW HO plastic KIT (what was being discussed), not any prototype. We are
NOT discussing the D&H #16153, a more conventional 4-truck 8-axle car.
The 4-truck HO model ECW produced was offered as BOTH a PRR F38 and a D&H car. I suspect they were the same, except for the length of the main deck.
Their part no.4700 is the D&H model, a 12-axle 4-truck car. I have no idea if it even has a prototype, D&H or other, but it exists as a model.
I have a Railworks PRR F38 and the ECW 4-truck flat. They are virtually identical except for the deck-length and end platforms. Hey both have 12 axles and four trucks.
Here, copied off an eBay listing are photos of BOTH versions.
Dan MItchell
==========
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
rdgbuff56
Would you want to sell it? Francis A. Pehowic, Jr.
On Saturday, February 8, 2020, 12:12:16 PM EST, Daniel A. Mitchell <danmitch@...> wrote: Bob Kelly states : "The Eastern Car Works #4700 is labeled as a PRR F38 but will build either car. The kit is an F38 but the instructions and marks on the deck parts show how to shorten the deck for the D&H version. The included decals had both PRR and D&H". That’s interesting! Mine is in a box labeled “D&H", not PRR. So, there must have been several versions of packaging. As I earlier stated the cars are identical except for the main-deck length. I have not looked into my kit for several years (it’s buried), but it may well be true that it will build either version. However, it was definitely marketed as a D&H car, and the replies make it clear that it was marketed separately as a PRR F38. Lilekely the same kit in two different boxes. I can’t recall whether my D&H version includes PRR decals. I’ll need to dig it out and take a look. Dan Mitchell ==========
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Bob Kelly states : "The Eastern Car Works #4700 is labeled as a PRR F38 but will build either car. The kit is an F38 but the instructions and marks on the deck parts show how to shorten the deck for the D&H version. The included decals had both PRR and D&H".
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That’s interesting! Mine is in a box labeled “D&H", not PRR. So, there must have been several versions of packaging. As I earlier stated the cars are identical except for the main-deck length. I have not looked into my kit for several years (it’s buried), but it may well be true that it will build either version. However, it was definitely marketed as a D&H car, and the replies make it clear that it was marketed separately as a PRR F38. Lilekely the same kit in two different boxes. I can’t recall whether my D&H version includes PRR decals. I’ll need to dig it out and take a look. Dan Mitchell ==========
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Tom Madden
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 09:33 AM, Bob Webber wrote:
Hmmm...I particularly like the list of "Similar Items" at the bottom of the page..... Tom Madden
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Bob Webber
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
Bill Kelly
The Eastern Car Works #4700 is labeled as a PRR F38 but will build
either car. The kit is an F38 but the instructions and marks on the deck parts
show how to shorten the deck for the D&H version. The included decals had
both PRR and D&H.
Later,
Bill Kelly
Daniel A. Mitchell wrote:
The two cars are very similar, but not identical. Both have four 3-axle
Buckeye trucks mounted on span bolsters. The PRR F38 has a main deck that
extends almost the full-length of the car, with minimal exposed decks on the
span bolsters. The D&H version has a shorter main deck, and much larger end
platforms (“porches”) on the span bolsters.
The Eastern car works part number for the D&H car was 4700.
Dan Mitchell
|
|
Re: D&H Flat
rdgbuff56
It appears to me that the D&H car is just a car with a shorter deck. If you had the F38, just modify deck by shortening it. Francis A. Pehowic, Jr.
On Saturday, February 8, 2020, 11:20:54 AM EST, Daniel A. Mitchell <danmitch@...> wrote: Nope! I’m no D&H expert. I was referring to the ECW HO plastic KIT (what was being discussed), not any prototype. We are NOT discussing the D&H #16153, a more conventional 4-truck 8-axle car. The 4-truck HO model ECW produced was offered as BOTH a PRR F38 and a D&H car. I suspect they were the same, except for the length of the main deck. Their part no.4700 is the D&H model, a 12-axle 4-truck car. I have no idea if it even has a prototype, D&H or other, but it exists as a model. I have a Railworks PRR F38 and the ECW 4-truck flat. They are virtually identical except for the deck-length and end platforms. Hey both have 12 axles and four trucks. Here, copied off an eBay listing are photos of BOTH versions. Dan MItchell ==========
|
|