Date   

Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

 

The second car has coil sprung trucks. Just FYI. 

Thanks!
Brian Ehni 
(Sent from my iPhone)

On Jan 15, 2021, at 9:03 PM, Dan Smith <espeefan@...> wrote:

Richard Brennan wrote:

Photo on 4-8-1937 as SP 43595
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30745/rec/693
Two days later, 4-10-1937, with SAME load... as SP 49679
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30879

I'm not sure if this is to imply that these 2 cars are the same car ? The same actual load ?

SP 43595 is an F-50-12 class car, 40' 10" length, with 70t trucks added. A temporary expedient ? Not listed in notes in the 7-39 ORER.

SP 49679 is an F-70-1 class car, 52' length, according to Tony's book.
But the 7-37 ORER lists it as an F-50-14, the last in it's # series. Were these trucks added for this load ? Kept with the car creating a new one off class ?
This might be a good question for Tony to chime in on.
          Was car 49679 built as a 70t car? As class F-70-1 ?
          Or was this car converted after delivery from an F-50-14 ? And then kept that way ? Car listed as 70t car in 3-39 ORER.

An interesting tidbit,
Dan Smith


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car(s) Transformer(s)

Richard Brennan
 

Dan

Upon closer examination I think you are correct - Re-writing:
These are two nearly-identical transformers on TWO different SP 70-ton(ish) SP Flat cars:

Photo on 4-8-1937 on SP 43595 F-50-12 ... with what look to be 70-ton leaf-spring trucks.
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30745/rec/693

Two days later, 4-10-1937, with nearly identical load... SP 49679 , the lone F-70-1... nee F-50-14 with heavier trucks.
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30879
AFAIK... this is the only known (so far) photo of 49679... on what was probably its first revenue trip.

--------------------
Richard Brennan - San Leandro CA
--------------------

At 07:03 PM 1/15/2021, Dan Smith wrote:
Richard Brennan wrote:

Photo on 4-8-1937 as SP 43595
<https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30745/rec/693>https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30745/rec/693
Two days later, 4-10-1937, with SAME load... as SP 49679
<https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30879>https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30879

I'm not sure if this is to imply that these 2 cars are the same car ? The same actual load ?

SP 43595 is an F-50-12 class car, 40' 10" length, with 70t trucks added. A temporary expedient ? Not listed in notes in the 7-39 ORER.

SP 49679 is an F-70-1 class car, 52' length, according to Tony's book.
But the 7-37 ORER lists it as an F-50-14, the last in it's # series. Were these trucks added for this load ? Kept with the car creating a new one off class ?
This might be a good question for Tony to chime in on.
Was car 49679 built as a 70t car? As class F-70-1 ?
Or was this car converted after delivery from an F-50-14 ? And then kept that way ? Car listed as 70t car in 3-39 ORER.

An interesting tidbit,
Dan Smith


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

akerboomk
 

RE:

Photo on 4-8-1937 as SP 43595
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30745/rec/693
Two days later, 4-10-1937, with SAME load... as SP 49679
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30879

 

Look like different cars to me?

-       Trucks different

-       595 has a stake pocket behind side grabs, 679 not.

-       Side completely flat on 679, looks like it is “stepped”(??) on 575

 

Ken


--
Ken Akerboom


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

 

Richard Brennan wrote:

Photo on 4-8-1937 as SP 43595
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30745/rec/693
Two days later, 4-10-1937, with SAME load... as SP 49679
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30879

I'm not sure if this is to imply that these 2 cars are the same car ? The same actual load ?

SP 43595 is an F-50-12 class car, 40' 10" length, with 70t trucks added. A temporary expedient ? Not listed in notes in the 7-39 ORER.

SP 49679 is an F-70-1 class car, 52' length, according to Tony's book.
But the 7-37 ORER lists it as an F-50-14, the last in it's # series. Were these trucks added for this load ? Kept with the car creating a new one off class ?
This might be a good question for Tony to chime in on.
          Was car 49679 built as a 70t car? As class F-70-1 ?
          Or was this car converted after delivery from an F-50-14 ? And then kept that way ? Car listed as 70t car in 3-39 ORER.

An interesting tidbit,
Dan Smith


Re: Southern railway flat cars

A&Y Dave in MD
 

The question does not have a precise answer because the change would have had to occur over time.  When did Southern executives decide to change the color?  About 1953-4.  When did the last of Southern flat cars with black disappear off the rails?  Probably not till after the merger with the N&W in 1982 (Kinkead book shows black Southern freight cars in Roman lettering in the 70's). New built cars after 1960 at least are going to be Southern freight car red.  Photos are your best friend.
--
____________________________
David Bott, modeling the A&Y in '34


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

Richard Brennan
 

At 01:00 PM 1/15/2021, brianleppert@att.net wrote:
The flat car is clearly stenciled above the left hand truck "CAPY 140000", making it a 70 ton capacity car.. So it can't be a F-50-12 class flat car, can it?
Sure it can...
A quick shop change to 70-ton trucks...because an important shipper has a LARGE load: Voila!

SP Freight Cars Vol 3, p 220 lists F-70-1 as a single car: SP 49679...
p221 'The "missing' 400th car was the experimental F-70-1, car no 49679.'

Photo on 4-8-1937 as SP 43595
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30745/rec/693
Two days later, 4-10-1937, with SAME load... as SP 49679
https://hdl.huntington.org/digital/collection/p16003coll2/id/30879


--------------------
Richard Brennan - San Leandro CA
--------------------


Re: [Non-DoD Source] [RealSTMFC] Photos: Assorted Gondolas & Flat Cars

lrkdbn
 

I wonder if it might have sometimes been that, faced with a large high value shipment like this power plant machinery that the RR might overhaul and paint cars just for that shipment,rather than just grab the first car off the yard track. This would account for the clean appearance of many of the cars in this set of pictures- if they did do this, it would be just the sort of practice that would die off in the Depression and war years
Larry King


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

 

Oops, listing for one 70t car,  49679, listed in the 7-39 ORER.

In the 7-37 ORER,  49679 is listed as a 50t F-50-14 car, the last in that # series.

Dan Smith


ADMIN: Steam-Era Freight Cars ONLY (was: Getting paid on Ebay)

Aley, Jeff A
 

Hi Folks,

 

               Ebay and their financial policies are OFF TOPIC for RealSTMFC.  Please have your discussions off-list.

 

Thanks,

 

-Jeff Aley

Deputy Moderator, RealSTMFC

 


locked Re: Getting paid on Ebay

mel perry
 

pete:
use plastic, there's a seperate entry
;-)


On Fri, Jan 15, 2021, 1:36 PM Peter Hall <petehall6369@...> wrote:
New subject, but since a lot of transactions for steam era freight cars are made on ebay, probably by all of us, this might be important:

Ebay announced today that they are going to change the pay process - now, payments will go directly to your bank, not to your PayPal account: no more PayPal processing fees.  That sounded good until I read further - ebay wants your bank account information.

In light of recent events, does that concern anyone?

Thanks
Pete

On Jan 15, 2021, at 3:00 PM, brianleppert@... wrote:

The flat car is clearly stenciled above the left hand truck "CAPY  140000", making it a 70 ton capacity car..  So it can't be a F-50-12 class flat car, can it?

Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV


locked Re: Getting paid on Ebay

Gene Semon
 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Richard Townsend via groups.io
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 4:45 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Getting paid on Ebay

 

Are you sure this isn't a scam for getting your bank account information? I've heard nothing like what you said from ebay.

Richard Townsend

Lincoln City, OR

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Hall <petehall6369@...>
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Getting paid on Ebay

New subject, but since a lot of transactions for steam era freight cars are made on ebay, probably by all of us, this might be important:

 

Ebay announced today that they are going to change the pay process - now, payments will go directly to your bank, not to your PayPal account: no more PayPal processing fees.  That sounded good until I read further - ebay wants your bank account information.

 

In light of recent events, does that concern anyone?

 

Thanks

Pete



On Jan 15, 2021, at 3:00 PM, brianleppert@... wrote:

 

The flat car is clearly stenciled above the left hand truck "CAPY  140000", making it a 70 ton capacity car..  So it can't be a F-50-12 class flat car, can it?

Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV

 


Virus-free. www.avg.com


locked Re: Getting paid on Ebay

Richard Townsend
 

Are you sure this isn't a scam for getting your bank account information? I've heard nothing like what you said from ebay.

Richard Townsend
Lincoln City, OR


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Hall <petehall6369@...>
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Getting paid on Ebay

New subject, but since a lot of transactions for steam era freight cars are made on ebay, probably by all of us, this might be important:

Ebay announced today that they are going to change the pay process - now, payments will go directly to your bank, not to your PayPal account: no more PayPal processing fees.  That sounded good until I read further - ebay wants your bank account information.

In light of recent events, does that concern anyone?

Thanks
Pete

On Jan 15, 2021, at 3:00 PM, brianleppert@... wrote:

The flat car is clearly stenciled above the left hand truck "CAPY  140000", making it a 70 ton capacity car..  So it can't be a F-50-12 class flat car, can it?

Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

 

There are no 70t,  1400000 lbs capacity flats listed in either the 7-37 or 7-39 ORER's for SP.

Tony may need to chime in here but I think SP got it's first 70T flats in 1940, if memory serves and I don't have to rush to find Tony's book.

Dan Smith


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

 

From the 7-37 ORER

FM  flat all steel   43191 to 43690                100000 lbs. capacity         497 cars
                                     note PPP                 120000 lbs. capacity             2 cars         43386     43595
         There are 2 other notes listing changes in capacity - both from 80000 lbs to 100000 lbs. and from different # series.

From the 7-39 ORER

FM  flat all steel  43191 to 43690                100000 lbs. capacity         495 cars
        There are no notes for special capacity flat cars listed in 7-39 ORER for this # series.

I'm sorry but I don't have any ORER's between these. There may have been a second capacity change on the 2 PPP note cars from 7-37 and a 10-37 or there abouts ORER
might show if that is the case.

Dan Smith


locked Re: Getting paid on Ebay

Charles Happel
 

In the worst case, I am looking at having it deposited to a debit card account, such as Kroger.

Chuck Happel

A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life.

Muhammad Ali


On Friday, January 15, 2021, 05:09:20 PM EST, Brian Shumaker <brian.shumaker@...> wrote:


Having just dumped a batch of unneeded locos on EBay and having to suffer 10% in fees plus the PayPal fees I’m just about done selling on the platform. For EBay to default to PayPal for purchases, it seems strange to bypass them on payments. I’m going to start looking for another auction site. Ebid? Worthpoint? Anyone with some insight on the others?
Brian Shumaker


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

brianleppert@att.net
 

I agree with Garth and Bruce.
The leaf-sprung trucks look like they were once under a steam locomotive tender.  Someone at SP must have determined the F-50-12 underframe could handle the transformer's weight.  But why not just use a 70-ton flat car?  Length too long?

Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV


locked Re: Getting paid on Ebay

James Brewer
 

I have bought and sold a few things here:  https://groups.io/g/HOswap

No fees, etc., but you are on your own as far as any problems, etc.  I  have not had any problems with anything I purchased or any sales that I have made.

Jim Brewer


locked Re: Getting paid on Ebay

Brian Shumaker
 

Having just dumped a batch of unneeded locos on EBay and having to suffer 10% in fees plus the PayPal fees I’m just about done selling on the platform. For EBay to default to PayPal for purchases, it seems strange to bypass them on payments. I’m going to start looking for another auction site. Ebid? Worthpoint? Anyone with some insight on the others?
Brian Shumaker


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

Bruce Smith
 

Garth, Folks,

Photo taken 4/8/1937. Reweigh 3/37. That supports a reweight immediately or nearly before loading this transformer. 😉

Regards,
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL


From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Garth Groff and Sally Sanford <mallardlodge1000@...>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 3:58 PM
To: main@realstmfc.groups.io <main@realstmfc.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load
 
Brian,

The number puts it in the F-50-12 series. I suspect it was a special conversion, maybe just for this movement and it was later returned to general service. Otherwise, why it was not renumbered or reclassed, I can't say.

This looks like a job for Tony to explain.

Yours Aye,


Garth Groff  🦆

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:00 PM brianleppert@... <brianleppert@...> wrote:
The flat car is clearly stenciled above the left hand truck "CAPY  140000", making it a 70 ton capacity car..  So it can't be a F-50-12 class flat car, can it?

Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV


Re: Photo: SP Flat Car 43595 With Transformer Load

Garth Groff and Sally Sanford
 

Brian,

The number puts it in the F-50-12 series. I suspect it was a special conversion, maybe just for this movement and it was later returned to general service. Otherwise, why it was not renumbered or reclassed, I can't say.

This looks like a job for Tony to explain.

Yours Aye,


Garth Groff  🦆

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:00 PM brianleppert@... <brianleppert@...> wrote:
The flat car is clearly stenciled above the left hand truck "CAPY  140000", making it a 70 ton capacity car..  So it can't be a F-50-12 class flat car, can it?

Brian Leppert
Carson City, NV

2601 - 2620 of 183573