Date   

Re: Jim Kinkaid's Freight Car Photos Collection

Schleigh Mike
 

This collection is awesome  Don't miss it!!!  Thanks to all.

Mike Schleigh  Grove City, Penna.

On Thursday, January 21, 2021, 11:58:45 AM EST, Steve and Barb Hile <shile@...> wrote:


Back in the days of the Yahoo groups, Jim Kinkaid posted a large number of builder's photos, mostly Pullman Standard, to the files area of the Modern Freight Car list.  It was not possible to migrate those photos to the groups.io platform that our groups have now migrated to.

However, through the efforts of MFCL list owner, Jim Eager and Jim Kinkaid, himself, we are now able to make those photos available again on a Smug Mug site that can be accessed from the Pullman Library website at


Thanks to Bob Webber, the curator of the Pullman Library, for making this possible.

And a special thanks to Jim Kinkaid for adding more photos to the file so that the time period extends back to include car built before the time period of the MFCL.  So, there is a lot of items of interest to freight car fans, including a nice selection of Rock Island cars for folks on that list.

Please take a look and enjoy.

Steve Hile


Jim Kinkaid's Freight Car Photos Collection

Steve and Barb Hile
 

Back in the days of the Yahoo groups, Jim Kinkaid posted a large number of builder's photos, mostly Pullman Standard, to the files area of the Modern Freight Car list.  It was not possible to migrate those photos to the groups.io platform that our groups have now migrated to.

However, through the efforts of MFCL list owner, Jim Eager and Jim Kinkaid, himself, we are now able to make those photos available again on a Smug Mug site that can be accessed from the Pullman Library website at


Thanks to Bob Webber, the curator of the Pullman Library, for making this possible.

And a special thanks to Jim Kinkaid for adding more photos to the file so that the time period extends back to include car built before the time period of the MFCL.  So, there is a lot of items of interest to freight car fans, including a nice selection of Rock Island cars for folks on that list.

Please take a look and enjoy.

Steve Hile


Re: Photo: SP Yard

Benjamin Hom
 

Claus Schlund wrote:
"How about cars placarded as "Unload this Side" / "Unload other Side"

Bruce Smith wrote at 7:45 AM:
"In the RARE circumstance where a car must be directionally spotted for unloading (end door must face a ramp, for example)..."


Ben Hom


Re: Photo: SP Yard

Claus Schlund \(HGM\)
 

Hi Bruce and List Members,
 
Bruce asked: "Why would you want to turn a freight car around to run the opposite direction down the line?"
 
How about cars placarded as "Unload this Side" / "Unload other Side"
 
Claus Schlund
 
 

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: SP Yard

Ray,

Why would you want to turn a freight car around to run the opposite direction down the line? You simply add the car. In the RARE circumstance where a car must be directionally spotted for unloading (end door must face a ramp, for example) the car would be turned using the closest turntable or wye. However, generally, there was no need to "turn" freight cars.

Regards,
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL


From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Ray Hutchison <rayhutchison2@...>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 6:19 AM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: SP Yard
 
OK.  That brake wheel (and for all of the other cars facing you in the photograph) raises a question I have been thinking about for the last month or so.  It's not like all trains go in the same direction.  So let's say these cars are all headed west.  A freight consist that has been traveling east enters the yard.  Short of running them out on a wye, how does one turn around an incoming car to add to the westbound cars?


Re: Photo: SP Yard

Mont Switzer
 

Bruce,

 

Unlike the PRR that had an extensive infrastructure smaller roads (like the Monon) could only turn cars (and locomotives) at certain locations, so it took some planning.  As the need to turn steam diminished turning locations were eliminated.

 

As an interesting side note, in the intermodal era (starts in earnest about 1954) all trailers loaded and unloaded on the Monon had their noses facing north.  Thus no turning required. 

 

As interline piggyback cars were accepted turning once again had to be managed.

 

Mont 


From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io [main@RealSTMFC.groups.io] on behalf of Bruce Smith [smithbf@...]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 7:45 AM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: SP Yard

Ray,

Why would you want to turn a freight car around to run the opposite direction down the line? You simply add the car. In the RARE circumstance where a car must be directionally spotted for unloading (end door must face a ramp, for example) the car would be turned using the closest turntable or wye. However, generally, there was no need to "turn" freight cars.

Regards,
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL


From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Ray Hutchison <rayhutchison2@...>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 6:19 AM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: SP Yard
 
OK.  That brake wheel (and for all of the other cars facing you in the photograph) raises a question I have been thinking about for the last month or so.  It's not like all trains go in the same direction.  So let's say these cars are all headed west.  A freight consist that has been traveling east enters the yard.  Short of running them out on a wye, how does one turn around an incoming car to add to the westbound cars?


Re: Photo: SP Yard

Bruce Smith
 

Ray,

Why would you want to turn a freight car around to run the opposite direction down the line? You simply add the car. In the RARE circumstance where a car must be directionally spotted for unloading (end door must face a ramp, for example) the car would be turned using the closest turntable or wye. However, generally, there was no need to "turn" freight cars.

Regards,
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL


From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Ray Hutchison <rayhutchison2@...>
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 6:19 AM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [RealSTMFC] Photo: SP Yard
 
OK.  That brake wheel (and for all of the other cars facing you in the photograph) raises a question I have been thinking about for the last month or so.  It's not like all trains go in the same direction.  So let's say these cars are all headed west.  A freight consist that has been traveling east enters the yard.  Short of running them out on a wye, how does one turn around an incoming car to add to the westbound cars?


Re: Photo: SP Yard

Ray Hutchison
 

OK.  That brake wheel (and for all of the other cars facing you in the photograph) raises a question I have been thinking about for the last month or so.  It's not like all trains go in the same direction.  So let's say these cars are all headed west.  A freight consist that has been traveling east enters the yard.  Short of running them out on a wye, how does one turn around an incoming car to add to the westbound cars?


Re: Southern Pacific Rebuilt Box Car 32620

Paul Doggett
 

Lester 

That’s another fine build.
Paul Doggett.    England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 


On 21 Jan 2021, at 10:11, Garth Groff and Sally Sanford <mallardlodge1000@...> wrote:


Friends,

Actually pennies work well for house cars, are a lot cheaper ounce-for-ounce than lead, and unlike steel they are non-magnetic (unless you are using those old 1943 steel pennies). I keep a jar of pennies under my workbench just for freight car weights.

Yours Aye,


Garth Groff  🦆

\

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:38 PM BRIAN PAUL EHNI <bpehni@...> wrote:

I try to avoid steel weights these days due to possible rust issues in the future. You should at least paint them before installing.

 

 

Thanks!
--

<image001.png>

Brian Ehni

 

 

From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Lester Breuer <rforailroad@...>
Reply-To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 8:14 PM
To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: [RealSTMFC] Southern Pacific Rebuilt Box Car 32620

 

I have completed the build of a Sunshine Models Southern Pacific (SP) single-sheathed rebuilt boxcar 32620 with “Pratt” truss design and Hutchins roof.  If you are interested in the build of this resin kit of SP rebuilt box car 32620 including changes and addition of parts not in the kit as resin cast Hutchins roof.  Photos and writeup of the build process including paint, lettering and weathering are now available on my blog I have to share photos and writeup of modeling projects on my Minneapolis & Northland Railroad Company.   If you would like to take a look please do at the following link:

http://mnrailroadcab100.blogspot.com/


Lester Breuer


Re: Southern Pacific Rebuilt Box Car 32620

Garth Groff and Sally Sanford
 

Friends,

Actually pennies work well for house cars, are a lot cheaper ounce-for-ounce than lead, and unlike steel they are non-magnetic (unless you are using those old 1943 steel pennies). I keep a jar of pennies under my workbench just for freight car weights.

Yours Aye,


Garth Groff  🦆

\

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 10:38 PM BRIAN PAUL EHNI <bpehni@...> wrote:

I try to avoid steel weights these days due to possible rust issues in the future. You should at least paint them before installing.

 

 

Thanks!
--

Brian Ehni

 

 

From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Lester Breuer <rforailroad@...>
Reply-To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 8:14 PM
To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: [RealSTMFC] Southern Pacific Rebuilt Box Car 32620

 

I have completed the build of a Sunshine Models Southern Pacific (SP) single-sheathed rebuilt boxcar 32620 with “Pratt” truss design and Hutchins roof.  If you are interested in the build of this resin kit of SP rebuilt box car 32620 including changes and addition of parts not in the kit as resin cast Hutchins roof.  Photos and writeup of the build process including paint, lettering and weathering are now available on my blog I have to share photos and writeup of modeling projects on my Minneapolis & Northland Railroad Company.   If you would like to take a look please do at the following link:

http://mnrailroadcab100.blogspot.com/


Lester Breuer


Re: Southern Pacific Rebuilt Box Car 32620

 

I try to avoid steel weights these days due to possible rust issues in the future. You should at least paint them before installing.

 

 

Thanks!
--

Brian Ehni

 

 

From: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> on behalf of Lester Breuer <rforailroad@...>
Reply-To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 8:14 PM
To: <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io>
Subject: [RealSTMFC] Southern Pacific Rebuilt Box Car 32620

 

I have completed the build of a Sunshine Models Southern Pacific (SP) single-sheathed rebuilt boxcar 32620 with “Pratt” truss design and Hutchins roof.  If you are interested in the build of this resin kit of SP rebuilt box car 32620 including changes and addition of parts not in the kit as resin cast Hutchins roof.  Photos and writeup of the build process including paint, lettering and weathering are now available on my blog I have to share photos and writeup of modeling projects on my Minneapolis & Northland Railroad Company.   If you would like to take a look please do at the following link:

http://mnrailroadcab100.blogspot.com/


Lester Breuer


Re: 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

Dennis Storzek
 

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:02 PM, Dave Parker wrote:
t gets weirder with the PRR Crown trucks.  If you are looking at p. 608 of the 1919 Cyc, you'll see two line drawings and one image/photo, all three seemingly for the 70-ton version.  The line drawings both show the 5-10 WB.  But the head scratcher for me is that there are three different spring packages:  6-spring, 5-spring, and what looks like 4-spring in the photo, but I suppose could be a 5-spring without any of the central spring visible.  The photo of a 2E-F2 that I shared yesterday has the obvious 5-spring package.
Well, I don't know anything about Crown trucks, and don't claim to, but my impression is:

The caption of the 5'-6" wheelbase truck is in error, and it's really a fifty ton truck.
As to the 5'-10" wheelbase trucks, it's one sideframe designed to serve as either a 70 ton truck, or for those 85 and 90 ton coal cars both the PRR and N&W were developing, depending upon the spring arrangement installed.

But that's just a guess on my part. I'll leave it for the Pennsy fans to sort.

Dennis Storzek


Southern Pacific Rebuilt Box Car 32620

Lester Breuer
 

I have completed the build of a Sunshine Models Southern Pacific (SP) single-sheathed rebuilt boxcar 32620 with “Pratt” truss design and Hutchins roof.  If you are interested in the build of this resin kit of SP rebuilt box car 32620 including changes and addition of parts not in the kit as resin cast Hutchins roof.  Photos and writeup of the build process including paint, lettering and weathering are now available on my blog I have to share photos and writeup of modeling projects on my Minneapolis & Northland Railroad Company.   If you would like to take a look please do at the following link:

http://mnrailroadcab100.blogspot.com/


Lester Breuer


Re: 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

Dave Parker
 

Dennis:

Yes, my understanding is that the PRR Crown trucks, both 70- and 100-ton, had 5-10 wheelbases.  See attached PRR table, notably the 2E-F2 and 2F-F1 trucks.  (and apologies to whomever's website I swiped this from; I can't recall, so I can't give credit).

It gets weirder with the PRR Crown trucks.  If you are looking at p. 608 of the 1919 Cyc, you'll see two line drawings and one image/photo, all three seemingly for the 70-ton version.  The line drawings both show the 5-10 WB.  But the head scratcher for me is that there are three different spring packages:  6-spring, 5-spring, and what looks like 4-spring in the photo, but I suppose could be a 5-spring without any of the central spring visible.  The photo of a 2E-F2 that I shared yesterday has the obvious 5-spring package.

One of the "joys" of the CBC is their propensity for showing things that manufacturers wanted to sell to prospective customers, without an real clues as to whether they actually did.

Dave Parker
Swall Meadows, CA


Re: 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

Dennis Storzek
 

Can't stop beating this horse while it's still twitching :-)

I was curious what my source material for our Andrews truck was, and since the Hathi Trust now has the 1919 CBC on
line, I found the drawing:

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015006057858&view=1up&seq=1024

Since everyone wants to compare this to the models of PRR Crown trucks, I then went looking for drawings of them in my 1922 CBC (it loads a lot faster). I was then going to do a side-by-side comparison when I noticed something strange; according to the drawings, the Crown trucks have a 2" longer wheelbase, 5'-10" as opposed to 5'-8". Is this the way they were actually built? If so, of course they look more "masculine". Is this correct, or an error in the drawings presented in the CBC?

Dennis Storzek


Re: NP 10000 Series Boxcars by Rapido

WILLIAM PARDIE
 


The discussion last week on the Northern Pacific 10000 series box cars inspired to go to my pipeline and look at my half finished Sunshone kit.  I forget just why it fell on my priorityg list but I expect that it had something to do with a photo.  I had a really inspiring 3/4 view photo of the brake end.  It had gone missing. This photo very clearly showed the Miner hand brake and coupler release mechanism.  I had obtained a photo from someone on the list showing the opposite side of the end. Any help would be appreciated.

I would also appreciate a diagram of the brake appliances.

Thanks in advance for any help:

Bill Pardie





Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


LasrLasr


Re: Photo: SP Yard

Mark Rossiter
 

 

The brake wheel on the foreground flat car looks like some of those on my models that have experienced rough handling by fellow club members or if they were inadvertently bumped during assembly before the glue was completely dry!

 

Mark Rossiter


Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [RealSTMFC] 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

Gatwood, Elden J SAD
 

Guys;

 

I agree it is tough to tell.  The attached is one of the HD “Crown” Andrews-type used on the PRR, and the 70-ton and 100-ton are almost indistinguishable.  The Bowser Crown would be a very usable truck for this.

 

Elden Gatwood

 

From: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io <main@RealSTMFC.groups.io> On Behalf Of Dennis Storzek
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 2:33 PM
To: main@RealSTMFC.groups.io
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [RealSTMFC] 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

 

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:08 PM, Dave Parker wrote:

Ya know, as soon as I sent that, I knew it wasn't quite right.  The Accurail has the longer wheelbase, and I think the larger spring box, but I don't believe the truss members are as heavy-duty as on the 70-t Andrews.

Dave is correct, the Accurail Andrews truck is the 70 ton version, as our basic truck mold has the scale 5'-8" axle spacing. I just looked through our files this morning but couldn't find any reference to what I used for reference material. It's been twenty one years, I recall whatever it was it was published in one of the CBC's, as there was not much primary material available back then.

What are you comparing the Accurail truck to? It is possible the other model truck is too bulky :-)

Visual size comparison can be a fool's errand, because there was very little dimensional difference between the trucks, other than wheelbase. In the 1922 CBC I'm finding 50 ton trucks with a lower diagonal both 2-5/8" and 2-3/4" wide, and 70 ton trucks with the same 2-3/4" dimension. The difference in the width of the journal boxes is only 1"... that's .011" in HO scale. Any of the model trucks that have more robust looking journals likely have those parts larger than scale, since the NMRA standards make it impossible to accommodate the axle cone and keep the truck anywhere near scale width.

By the way, to get back on topic, nowhere have I found a drawing of a 100 ton capacity Andrews truck. Back in those days 100 ton capacity trucks were all specials, and there were some really outlandish designs.

Dennis Storzek


Re: 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

Tony Thompson
 

Dave Parker wrote:

This is the original USRA drawing for their standard trucks from the April, 1918, edition of Railway Mechanical Engineer, but also reproduced in the 1919 CBC . . .  It also seems to me that the exact shape of the side-frame, especially the top chord, is not being specified, implying some latitude to the individual manufacturers (of which there were several).

    As Richard Hendrickson frequently observed, each truck maker had an individual tweak on sideframe shape(s) in various areas of the part. That's one reason that the old traditional "Bettendorf" truck designation was so wrong: not only was Bettendorf itself out of the truck business after 1942, but the trucks of each other maker (American Steel Foundries, Buckeye, Columbia, Symington-Gould, National, General Steel, Standard, Scullin et al.) were a little different -- see any Cyc.

Tony Thompson




Re: 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

Dave Parker
 

Ron: 

I can read the road's initials in my hard-copy of the 1931 CBC:  "PA.A.&Mc.R.R.R."  =  Pittsburgh Allegheny and McKees Rocks Railroad.

Apparently a 25-mi switching line serving the McKee's Rocks area.  In my 1926 ORER, there were 7 locomotives and 125 freight cars (unspecified).
--
Dave Parker
Swall Meadows, CA


Re: 100-ton Andrews trucks in HO

mopacfirst
 

When I looked closer at the 100-ton Buckeye, it's apparent that the cast brackets for the clasp brake hangers are actually separate castings.  They appear to be fastened to the truck frames by the bolts that also retain the journal boxes.  I'll bet that was fun to maintain.

It also appears that the customer's (owning railroad's) name is cast into the truck frame, above and just inboard of the far wheelset.  Other than R.R. at the end of this string of characters, I can't clearly make it out, but I'll wager it is probably a steel road.  I also think that the figures 3-21 might be cast dead center on the truck frame surface, and the pattern number and foundry symbol are above and just inboard of the near wheelset.  And, of course, the 6 1/2 X 12 on the journal boxes, just in case the shop guys might confuse them.

Ron Merrick

3061 - 3080 of 184171