Re: Favorite freight car
CBarkan@...
In a message dated 5/21/03 8:41:08 AM, drs@... commits blasphemy by
stating: << B&O wagon-tops; them's homely, but spottable miles away >> Beauty is certainly in the eye of the beholder. I think the B&O's wagontops are among the most esthetically attractive of all freight cars. Combined with the elegance and uniqueness of their construction design, they are certainly among my favorite. Of course I MIGHT be biased. I agree that they are spottable from a great distance (perhaps even miles in the right photograph!) Chris Barkan
|
|
Kadee C&O 50' PS-1
Scott Pitzer
I'm surprised to find myself asking this, but where has a photo been published of the C&O 21000-21499 series as modeled by Kadee? I'm looking for one in original form. I want to put about 9 years of wear on the paint job. The photo in C&O Color Guide is in later paint and minus running board. Otherwise the details seem to match well. I think?
Years ago I did one from the Bev Bel/Robin's Rails kit, where I replaced much of their lettering with more accurate stuff from Champ, but I didn't make a note of what photo I was referring to! Thanks Scott Pitzer
|
|
Re: This is completely ON topic!
Denis F. Blake <dblake2996@...>
Without a doubt, from my view point, that would be the Seaboards 1932 cars.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
These cars saw service for many years with some of them getting rebuilt into ventilated express cars as well. The Seaboard was second in total owned of these cars, behind the Mopac. Sure would be nice to get a plastic model of this car but there were simply too many variations and too few so called "major" owners for this to happen. Best regards, Denis F. Blake NS Conductor Columbus, OH TTHOTS Please visit my photo site at http://hyperphoto.photoloft.com/view/allalbums.asp?s=cano&u=1665499
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Lane" <billlane@...> To: "Steam Era Freight cars" <STMFC@...> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 7:50 PM Subject: [STMFC] This is completely ON topic! Hi All,
|
|
Re: This is completely ON topic!
thompson@...
Ben Hom said:
PRR Class X29: ...the PennsyI'd vote with Ben. That's why the X29 was on the first Friends of the Freight Car shirt. (and you thought I was an unrepentant teaser of SPFs...) Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 http://www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroads and on Western history
|
|
Re: Caboose brakes
thompson@...
Jace Kahn said:
It is not often that I can second-guess you on freight car matters, but someOkay, Jace, I should have said that STATISTICALLY cabooses always had two brake wheels. I'm sure that there are 19th century cars without them. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 http://www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroads and on Western history
|
|
Re: Athearn's 48-foot gon
thompson@...
Scott Chatfield writes:
Just a word about that gon. It does have a prototype, Bethlehem's late-50sAnd you're still sure, Scott, that this follows a prototype? I'd call it a loose use of the word "follow." Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 http://www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@... Publishers of books on railroads and on Western history
|
|
Re: This is completely ON topic!
Spen Kellogg <spenkell@...>
Bill Lane wrote:
Hi All,SP Tea and Silk car. Second choice is the SP BR-40-10 express reefer. Regards, Spen Kellogg
|
|
Re: This is completely ON topic!
Steven Delibert <STEVDEL@...>
Well, painful to answer an on-topic message, but this one is easy for
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
me: New York Central "USRA" boxcars, of course: Shouldn't exist, were built by the bazillions and survived for decades, easy to spot, signature car of my favorite big railroad, available in several variations in Wonderful Westerfield kits, only close competition is Westerfield NYC hoppers . . ... Now, if somebody really made Ulster & Delaware models, we might have something to debate, but otherwise, case closed for me! Doubtless rational minds may differ. Steve Delibert
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Lane <billlane@...> In 100 words or less, what is your single favorite Steam Era Freight Car, and WHY? Principal contributors Ted Culotta and Ben Hom are required to
|
|
Re: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's
Mont Switzer <ZOE@...>
SHAWN: WHEN I WAS HANGING AROUND THE LOCAL ELEVATOR IN THE 1950'S AND
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
1960'S (BECAUSE IT WAS NEXT TO THE RAILROAD) THEY RECEIVED CORN, WHEAT, OATS AND A NEW CROP, SOY BEANS. THE CORN WAS SHELLED AND ELEVATED TO BINS IN THE ELEVATOR BUILDING. THE CORN COBS WERE ELEVATED ALSO AND THEN ALLOWED TO DROP IN THE COB BURNER BY GRAVITY. THE WHEAT, OATS AND SOY BEANS WERE ALSO ELEVATED AND STORED. BOXCARS WERE LOADED IN BULK BY GRAVITY FROM THE BINS HIGH ABOVE IN THE ELEVATOR. SIX FOOT DOOR CARS ONLY, STEEL CARS PREFERRED. THIS GRAIN WAS PURCHASED BY THE ELEVATOR FROM THE FARMERS AND WHEN RESOLD WAS SHIPPED IN BULK BY RAIL. A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF GRAIN WAS RETAINED FOR LOCAL FEED MILLING NEEDS. THE ELEVATORS AROUND HERE WERE ALSO FEED MILLS. FARMERS WOULD BRING IN THEIR GRAINS, DUMP THEM AND GET THEM BACK GROUND AND MIXED AS FEED IN BURLAP BAGS. THE FEED BAGS WERE USUALLY HAULED BACK TO THE FARM IN THE SAME TRUCK THAT BROUGHT THE GRAINS IN ALTHOUGH SOME FARMERS PURCHASED GRAIN THAT WAS IN STORAGE IN THE ELEVATOR. THERE COULD HAVE BEEN LOADS OF BAGGED FEED SHIPPED AND RECEIVED IN BOXCARS DURING THIS PERIOD, BUT I DO NOT RECALL ANY. THIS WAS LEFT TO THE LARGER MILLS THAT SHIPPED AND RECEIVED IN BULK. THE LOCAL ELEVATOR ALSO RECEIVED VARIOUS GRADES OF COAL IN HOPPER CARS, LIQUID FERTILIZER IN TANK CARS, BAGGED FERTILIZER, SALT, FENCING, FEEDERS, WATER TANKS AND GATES IN BOXCARS. ALL OF THIS WAS SOLD AND DISTRIBUTED BY THE ELEVATOR COMPANY. OCCASIONALLY WE WOULD SEE A FLAT CAR OF ELECTRICAL POLES FOR THE LOCAL REMC OR TELEPHONE POLES THE LOCAL BELL TELEPHONE AFFILIATE. YOU CAN GET A LOT OF MILEAGE OUT OF A SINGLE ELEVATOR SIDING. IN RURAL AMERICA THE LOCAL ELEVATOR WAS THE HUB OF ACTIVITY DURING THE HARVEST. BECAUSE OF THE ELEVATOR THE LOCAL BANK, DRUG STORE, RESTAURANT, SERVICE STATION, HARDWARE AND A COUPLE OF OTHER SMALL BUSINESSES WERE IN EXISTENCE. MONT SWITZER
----- Original Message -----
From: Beckert, Shawn <shawn.beckert@...> To: <STMFC@...> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 7:21 PM Subject: [STMFC] RE: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's UPRR had covered hoppers in the 1940'sBut UP #1-500 were 1958 cubic feet, 70 tons nominal capacity
|
|
Re: Brass costs
Schuyler G Larrabee <SGL2@...>
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: <thompson@...> Subject: [STMFC] Brass costs Tony Thompson moaned: You mean I was supposed to get paid for all that research I did forthose guys? Where were you when I needed you, Schuyler?Yeah, well, I've done my share too, but I can tell you that when Alco Models [to use a defunct example] did a model the research was ALL on the contributor, or at least 95% was. Now, I know that some importers do their own research. The contribution made by non-employees of the importer in the cases of two cases I have personally been involved with was essentially advising the importer where to find an example of the real thing, which they went and researched themselves. OTOH, I have done, for the same importer, extensive research into a prototype which will be produced as a model, of which there is a snowball's chance it would ever have been done otherwise. I will be compensated, at a rate approaching $0.05/hr. If that. SGL
|
|
Re: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's
Mont Switzer <ZOE@...>
SHAWN: ADDING TO WHAT ANDY HAS SAID MOST MIDWESTERN TOWNS STARTED OUT WITH
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
A WOODEN ELEVATOR STRUCTURE THAT WAS USED TO GRIND FEED AS WELL AS STORE GRAIN FOR SHIPMENT. AS GRAIN PRODUCTION INCREASED AND FARMERS WENT TO CASH CROPS STORAGE SILO'S WERE BUILT USING THE FAVORED TECHNOLOGY OF THE TIME. NEARBY SULPHUR SPRINGS, IN IS A GREAT EXAMPLE. THE OLD FEED MILL IS A WOODEN STRUCTURE BUILT BEFORE 1920. STORAGE CAPACITY WAS FIRST INCREASED WITH SILO'S BUILT OF CONCRETE BLOCKS WITH STEEL STAYS AROUND THEM. I'M GUESSING THIS WAS DONE IN THE LATE 1920'S OR 1930'S. NEXT CAME SILO'S ASSEMBLED OF FLANGED STEEL BOLTED TOGETHER. THEY WERE PROBABLY BUILT BEFORE WWII. IN THE 1950'S A NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE DUMPER AND SILOS WERE ADDED AND THEY DOMINATE THE ELEVATOR TO THIS DAY. THE 1960'S SAW THE ADDITION OF HUGE CORRUGATED STEEL "GRAIN BINS" ADDED. I HAVE A POSTER SIZE SHOT OF THIS ELEVATOR THAT I SOMETIMES USE AS A BACKDROP FOR SCALE MODEL PHOTOGRAPHY. A LITTLE OFF TOPIC IS WHAT IS GOING ON OVER AT EMPORIA, IN. WHEN THERE IS A BUMPER CORN CROP THEY RUN OUT OF BINS AND SILO'S. WHEN THIS HAPPENS THEY HAUL THE GRAIN FROM THE DUMPER AROUND THE CLOCK IN DUMP TRUCKS INTO A 6 FOOT HIGH "PEN" MADE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SECTIONS WITH A CRUSHED STONE FLOOR. THEY JUST BACK IN THE "PEN" AND DUMP THE SHELLED CORN. THEY USE AUGERS TO PILE IT HIGH AND A BUCKET LOADER HELPS, ALSO . NEXT COMES A PLASTIC COVER WHICH IS INFLATED BY BLOWERS AND PROTECTS THE PILE FROM MOISTURE. THIS IS LOT CHEAPER TO CONSTRUCT THAN THE SILO'S AND BINS OF THE PAST. THE PEN SETS EMPTY MOST OF THE YEAR AND IS JUST A HALF A STEP BETTER THAN PILING IT ON THE GROUND IN MY HUMBLE OPINION. CLOSER TO TOPIC, THEY SWITCH EMPORIA WITH AN ALCO S-2. ON TOPIC, THE PLACE WAS A LOT SMALLER IN THE 1950'S AND THE LOADED STRINGS BOXCARS. MONT SWITZER
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Sperandeo <asperandeo@...> To: <STMFC@...> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 3:16 PM Subject: RE: [STMFC] Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's Shawn Beckert asked:far back as the first decade of the 20th century. I don't know when they wouldsouthwest than the concrete variety?"http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
Re: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's
Howard R. Garner <hrgarner@...>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 10:50:14 -0700This first concrete grain elevator was built about 1900. By the mid 1910's the construction was being covered in text books. Howard hanging out in 1905
|
|
D&SL Gons
Howard R. Garner <hrgarner@...>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 09:13:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: newrail@...Good kits. The stack up well against a Westerfield or Sunshine. Offered in both inside stake and outside stake version. They also offered the DN-WP original lettering. Only one got ya. If you warm the casting to remove warping, the casting stays soft.
|
|
Re: This is completely ON topic!
Benjamin Frank Hom <b.hom@...>
Bill Lane wrote:
In 100 words or less, what is your single favorite Steam Era Freight Car, and WHY? Principal contributors Ted Culotta and Ben Hom are required to respond. PRR Class X29: It wasn't the first steel boxcar. It had three significant design limitations: a side sill design that trapped water, when combined with a leaky roof design, led to significant corrosion problems in virtually every car built. Additionally, the car had a smallish cubic capacity due to its 8 ft 7 in IH. The Pennsy kept it in production so long that it was obsolescent by the time the last one was built in 1932. But the Pennsy built 28,701 of them, and they showed up in every kind of freight and passenger (as express cars) all over North America from 1924 into the 1960s. You simply can't model a steam era freight train without at least one. Runner-up - NYC USRA-design steel boxcar: Just as numerous as the X29 when you add up all of them system wide, but sorely underrepresented on almost every steam-era layout. Another car you just got to have to model a steam era freight train. Ben Hom
|
|
Re: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's
ljack70117@...
I think someone is mixed up that wood elevators with a metal or asbestos covering on the out side made them fire proof. Also concrete elevators were also more fire proof. This is not true. The danger of fire came NOT from the outside but from the inside. There were temperature probes put in each bin at about 10 to 15 foot intervals to keep tract of the temperature in each bin if the wheat got to hot it would erupt in flames. When the temperature reached a certain point they would move it to another bin. The moving cools it off. That is why an elevator never filled all of it's bins at least one would be empty and depending the size of the elevator may many more. You have never seen a concrete elevator on fire???? I have.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The metal coverings put on wood elevators was to protect it from the wood rotting from the weather. Thank you Larry Jackman
On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 08:21 PM, John Boren wrote:
Shawn,
|
|
Re: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's
ljack70117@...
The UNPAC had three sizes of hoppers used for grain 1970 Cf, 1792Cf and 2502 Cf. Used in the 1940s for grain. They were HK50-4, HK50-5 and HK70-1 hoppers that hat covers put on them for grain service.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thank you Larry Jackman
On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 07:57 PM, tim gilbert wrote:
ljack70117@... wrote:But UP #1-500 were 1,958 cubic feet, 70 tons nominal capacity cars which
|
|
Re: Accurail Hoppers
Richard Hendrickson
Hi,Yes (if you don't object to cast-on details) but no, the Santa Fe never owned USRA hoppers - and, in the era to which this list is devoted, hardly any cross hoppers of any description. Bulk mineral loads were handled primarily in the Santa Fe's large fleet of Caswell and post-Caswell GS gondolas. Richard H. Hendrickson Ashland, Oregon 97520
|
|
Re: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's
Shawn Beckert
UPRR had covered hoppers in the 1940's But UP #1-500 were 1958 cubic feet, 70 tons nominal capacity Grain hoppers generally were rated at around 3000 cubic footIt's my understanding that the 70-ton cars were used primarily for cement or sand loading. The GATX Airslide cars came along in the late 1950's, as I recall, and I'm not sure that they were used for grain so much as processed flour and the like. The "grain hopper" didn't come into its own until the PS-2's of the 1960's, AFAIK. The point of my original question was to gain an understanding of how boxcars in grain service were loaded in the 1950's. We know grain was bagged and loaded into cars, we know that cars with grain doors were loaded by chute. But did wooden grain elevators load both ways? And did concrete elevators load by chute only, or did some have the capability to fill "by the bag" and load a boxcar the old fashioned way? It's not an idle question; such information would be helpful in modeling an elevator located in the southwest of the 1950's. I haven't been able to locate any photos of grain elevators in the region/period I'm modeling to help in resolving this issue. Shawn Beckert
|
|
Re: Grainloading Facilities in the 1950's
John Boren <mccjbcmd@...>
Shawn, Concrete elevators date back to about 1915 when they became the standard for building new elevators. Generally the wood ones weren't torn down, however, so concrete and wood types coexisted for decades. In fact, there are still quite a few wood elevators left. I see them all the time in small towns in Kansas still today. Wood elevators were typically 65-75 feet tall, while concrete elevators were 85-115 feet tall. (The very large elevator complexes with dozens of bins were up to 130' tall.) So as the need for capacity increased (higher crop yields plus trucks allowed grain to be hauled farther to larger elevators) there was a change to concrete because they had outgrown the practical limits of wood elevator bins. A book I read (Grain Elevators by Lisa Mahar-Keplinger IIRC) also stated that the factors favoring the changeover were concrete ones were cheaper, easier to build, and fireproof, and lower maintenance. Most of the surviving wood elevators were sided after construction with asbestos or metal, principally to reduce fires. The book stated that wood elevators without steel or asbestos siding burned on the average every four years!! I would guess that there were actually fewer wood elevators in the southwest for two reasons. First, crop farming developed later in the southwest than in other parts of the country, so more of their elevators would have been built before 1915. Also, wood was more scarce (and therefore more expensive) in most parts of the southwest US in the late 1800s and early 1900s. I have more info, but since this is a freight car list, contact me directly if you're interested. Jack Boren
|
|
Re: This is completely ON topic!
tim gilbert <tgilbert@...>
Bill Lane wrote:
B&M Pulpwood Racks #29000-29099 which resembled an open-top stock car crammed inside a steel 40' gon with mangled tie rods spanning the top of the car. These lasted with arch bar trucks until 1949. Another candidate would be B&M 36' SUF Boxcar series #64680-65687 which had Fox Trucks. The last was retired from revenue service in 1948. Neither class could be considered "essential" or "ubiquitous" a la Culotta. Tim Gilbert Tim Gilbert
|
|