Industry sites for modeling 1940-50's?
trduck@...
Does anyone have any favorite web sites for showing plans or photos of industries in the 1940-50's. I'm looking for a small town lumber yard and a commerical coal distributor for home delivery. I have the Sanborn maps of the towns I'm modeling so the dimensions aren't an issue just looking for more photos to help with scratch-building.
Thanks Charlie
|
|
Re: P2K tank cars
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
I going to repost this because stupid me forgot to change the subject!
Back to the new P2K insulated 10K tanks. Following is the listing posted on the Walthers site, condensed. Could I have a year bracket (pre or post war) for the schemes and general usage area, for the files. Time to order! MPCX #1563 (Magnolia White) EORX #1133 (City Service) GATX #37154 (General American) MPCX #1611 (Magnolia Black) SDRX #26148 (Sinclair) TCX #9367 (Texaco) Thank you Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
Re: SFRD rebuilt reefers
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Ed Mines wrote:
I want to build a model of a version C SFRD rebuilt reefer from anGypsum running boards are expanded metal: slit and then stretched to open the slits. The result twists the "bars" for better traction, and the openings are kind of pointy ovals. Plano offered an Apex set but it's not listed in the currentNot really, though both were metal. On a new car the black is glossy, not dull like car cement. right?For the first couple of weeks, it might be a little shiny (remember the granules) but pretty quickly got dirty enough to be matte. IMO shiny roofs are a no-no, even on passenger cars (washers didn't do the roof). Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Re: Bohn Ventilators was Truss Rod Reefers
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
Back to the new P2K insulated 10K tanks. Following is the listing
posted on the Walthers site, condensed. Could I have a year bracket (pre or post war) for the schemes and general usage area, for the files. Time to order! MPCX #1563 (Magnolia White) EORX #1133 (City Service) GATX #37154 (General American) MPCX #1611 (Magnolia Black) SDRX #26148 (Sinclair) TCX #9367 (Texaco) Thank you Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
Re: SFRD rebuilt reefers
Ted Culotta <tculotta@...>
On May 16, 2005, at 8:41 AM, ed_mines wrote:
I want to build a model of a version C SFRD rebuilt reefer from anPlano offers Gypsum running boards and I believe they offered the SFRD running board/platform sets in Apex Tri-Lok, Morton and Gypsum. The gloss won't work in this case because the roof was coated with slate granules, which definitely were not glossy in appearance. Regards, Ted Culotta Speedwitch Media 100 14th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94402 info@speedwitch.com www.speedwitch.com (650) 787-1912
|
|
SFRD rebuilt reefers
ed_mines
I want to build a model of a version C SFRD rebuilt reefer from an
undec. IM kit. These cars have Gypsum roof walks. My recollection is that these are slotted, but I couldn't find any confirmation in the CBCs I had handy. Any suggestions of what to use for running boards and hatch platforms? Plano offered an Apex set but it's not listed in the current Walthers' catalog. Were Gypsum and Apex similar in appearance? The running board and hatch platforms are black, right? I was thinking of extending the top side sheet with a 1X4 inch styrene sheet and "painting" that extension with a black decal stripe. Anyone try this already? I guess I could use drafting tape, but I need the styrene as a spacer. On a new car the black is glossy, not dull like car cement. right? How about painting the hinges? They are almost flat on the car making Al Westerfield's technique iffy (for me at least). I never had good luck with Microscale masking. It seemed to be too viscous. Is another type better? Anyone ever dilute microscale's with water? Ed
|
|
Re: P2k 8k HPCX tank Car
Larry Grubb <larry450sl@...>
Brian,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
My July 1960 ORER lists this car. Larry Grubb Brian J Carlson <brian@bluemoon.net> wrote: Never mind my first question, these cars are still listed in the 1955 ORER. Can someone check a1958 ORER of me to see if HPCX 706 is still listed? Brian J Carlson P.E. Cheektowaga NY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian J Carlson" <brian@net.bluemoon.net> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:24 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] P2k 8k HPCX tank Car Tony, Thanks, I don't have his Tank Car Book, but I do have his AC&FHistory book and I found some diagrams that show my error in thinking. (Forothers that may be interested see page 48, it's a more modern car but theprinciple is the same.)Hercules after the arrive of the above mentioned cars in 1952? --------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/STMFC/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: STMFC-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour
|
|
Re: IC 10' boxcars
Ed Hawkins
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 08:02 PM, cobrapsl@aol.com wrote:
OK Ed, I am confused. I got a couple of the special run RC T&P carPaul, Joe Pennington once produced various detail parts in cast urethane including some box car doors. The MoPac Historical Society did not sponsor this project. I had Jerry Porter of Innovative Model Works produce them for me directly. I offered the kits for sale to MPHS members, but the project was completely funded and managed by myself. While I knew at the time that the doors in the IMWX 1937 AAR box car kit weren't precisely correct for the prototype cars (i.e., like ACL's 1937 AAR box cars), I chose to keep the costs within reason by offering the kits with the Youngstown doors with Camel door fixtures offered by IMWX. All of the T&P box cars I sold were in IMWX boxes. Jerry Porter had just sold his tooling for the 1937 AAR box car to Red Caboose and RC was just beginning to bring out models under their name. Jerry had a quantity of undecorated kits available (from his own stock) having ends with square corners, so I struck a deal with him for a quantity of these T&P cars. Jerry painted and lettered the models to my specifications (three different schemes depicting as-built, postwar, and circa 1958). Once Red Caboose took over production of the car, they immediately created new tooling for a better set of grab irons. The original IMWX kit was incredibly good for its time (it's now been about 15 years ago when it was first introduced), but the grabs were grossly oversize. So I purchased from Red Caboose a quantity of their grab irons so I could furnish them in my kits. That's the history in a nutshell. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
Re: B-50-22 series question
jaley <jaley@...>
Will the real B-50-22 please stand up?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The data I have show the REAL B-50-22 as having double-truss spring plankless trucks, Ajax hand brakes, and wood running boards. I also see that the B-50-22 has a big "UNION PACIFIC" painted on the side. :-) Regards, -Jeff
On May 15, 9:25pm, stefanelaine wrote:
Subject: [STMFC] B-50-22 series question --
Jeff Aley jaley@pcocd2.intel.com DPG Chipsets Product Engineering Intel Corporation, Folsom, CA (916) 356-3533
|
|
Re: B-50-22 series question
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Lee A. Gautreaux wrote:
How far will your coverage go? I assume that you will cover all ofYes, a bunch of the 70- and 100-ton cars. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Re: Lost cars
Rupert and Maureen <gamlenz@...>
Ed
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks for this information. I'll try to get a copy of these when they are published. Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Hawkins" <hawk0621@sbcglobal.net> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 3:53 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Lost cars Related to this subject, plans are in work for a 2-part article on
|
|
Re: Lost cars
Ed Hawkins
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 01:48 PM, Rupert and Maureen wrote:
My first recording of these XA-15's 49500-49674 was 7/45, but there isRupert, The 1/45 ORER lists CB&Q 49500-49674 with a triangle, but ..... for the number of cars in service. Even though the cars are reported to have been built in 1944, the ORER for 1/45 doesn't show any of them as being in service at that time. A CB&Q builder's photo of #49500 has a build date of 11-44, so the construction of the cars had begun in late 1944. Related to this subject, plans are in work for a 2-part article on Burlington's XA auto cars to be published in Railway Prototype Cyclopedia. The wood-sheathed cars through the XA-14s is planned for Volume 12 to be followed in Volume 13 with the all-steel XA-15 and XA-16 cars built 1941 through 1946. Will advise the STMFC as the completion time for Vol. 12 nears. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
Re: Use of black on roofs, ends, doors.
Ed Hawkins
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 02:46 PM, Scott Pitzer wrote:
d,Scott, The C&O cars I was referring to were 50' PS-1s numbered 21000-21499, built 1956. There's an overhead photo showing a new car in Erie In Color (page 114). Regards, Ed Hawkins [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: IC 10' boxcars
Ed Hawkins
On Sunday, May 15, 2005, at 12:04 PM, cobrapsl@aol.com wrote:
Just remember the T&P cars done by Ed Hawkins have the correct resinPaul, This isn't so. The doors used for these kits were the same doors used in the IMWX kits, having Camel door fixtures. The T&P prototype cars had Union Duplex fixtures. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
Re: B-50-22 series question
Lee Gautreaux
Stefan,
Hey, that is why they make food stamps! Actually, Tony's Vol III is indeed an incredible resource and answers many questions about SP's fleet of auto boxes and early flat cars. It is certainly the most info packed of the series and whets my appetite for the box car volume. keeping up with your prodigious output;-)Tony, How far will your coverage go? I assume that you will cover all of the 40 and 50 ton cars. Will you cover any of the early 70 or 100 ton cars? Lee A. Gautreaux - The RailGoat http://www.railgoat.railfan.net/
|
|
Re: B-50-22 series question
oliver
Tony,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Ah, now I understand. Thanks for clarifiying that! As often happens with historical data, an omission (in this case based on common knowledge at the time)can get one in trouble after the fact! Unfortunately, that does mean that I've got to get an order in to Plano for those roofwalks, but the trucks and brake won't be correct in any case regardless of choice for the B-50-22s. It seems that even with all the nice trucks and brake sets available there still is room for more. Volume 3 is apparently in the mail, so that should help with the automobile cars!(I must say that my wallet is having trouble keeping up with your prodigious output;-) Thanks Stefan .. --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Anthony Thompson <thompson@s...> wrote:
Stefan Lerché wrote:These cars are listed in the 1993 RMC article as having KlasingStefan, the Barber S2 feature is a bolster snubber. It is not a
|
|
Re: B-50-22 series question
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
I wrote:
cars had AAR trucks with spring planks (half Scullin, half Bettendorf), Apex steel running boards, and Equipco handbrakes.<<See my volume 3: all three features are wrong for this class. The I should have stated that the features described are for Class A-50-14. But obviously these features are equally wrong for B-50-22. In both cases, of course, they are easily corrected. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Re: B-50-22 series question
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Stefan Lerché wrote:
These cars are listed in the 1993 RMC article as having KlasingStefan, the Barber S2 feature is a bolster snubber. It is not a truck. Many truck makers licensed the Barber feature and included it in their proprietary trucks. Thus a buyer like SP could specify S2 trucks and only mean trucks with S2 snubbers included. The B-50-22 class, however, did not have S2 trucks. This is one of several (minor) errors in the 1993 RMC articles which will be corrected in the box car volume of my series, now in progress. "AAR" likewise refers only to the sideframe pattern in a general way; individual manufacturers implemented it in somewhat varying fashion as to appearance (which modelers care about), but the mechanical specs. were AAR. The trucks for this entire class were AAR double-truss trucks from American Steel Foundries, and they included Simplex spring snubbers. The SP order summary does not mention spring planks, for the very good reason that at that time (1941) the spring plank was standard. Spring plankless trucks were unusual and would merit mention. 2.What are Klasing brakes (I suspect that these are similar to theKlasing is a make of handbrake. They are not the same as Ajax. See any Cyc in the 1937 to 1953 period. 3. Did all these cars have steel roofwalks?Yes, Apex as you list. See my volume 3: all three features are wrong for this class. The cars had AAR trucks with spring planks (half Scullin, half Bettendorf), Apex steel running boards, and Equipco handbrakes. Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA 2942 Linden Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com (510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com Publishers of books on railroad history
|
|
Re: IC 10' boxcars
Paul Lyons
OK Ed, I am confused. I got a couple of the special run RC T&P car kits,
which included extra resin doors with Union duplex fixtures, from Joe Pennington. I thought that is how they all came in the Society run you had done. Your help is appreicated, as one is never to old to learn. Paul Lyons Laguna Niguel, CA
|
|
Re: B-50-22 series question
Doug Brown <brown194@...>
It appears that the term "double truss" is often misused and
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
misunderstood in this hobby. See Richard Hendrickson's article on freight trucks in RPC. The term refers to the construction of a stiffener in the lower chord of the sideframe. Accurails "Bettendorf" truck does not have this feature. Kadeee's "Bettendorf" truck does have this feature and has always been called a double truss truck. Although not originally labeled as such (correctly), Kadee is now labeling their T-section and Vulcan trucks as double truss trucks also, which they are not. Doug Brown
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of stefanelaine Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 4:25 PM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] B-50-22 series question Tony, These cars are listed in the 1993 RMC article as having Klasing brakes, Apex steel roofwalks and Barber S2 trucks. However, the 1956 freight car roster reprint book published by the SPH&TS lists these as being equipped with AAR double truss trucks with spring planks (eg: Accurail truck). My questions: 1.Which truck is correct? Where some sub groups of the B-50-22s with the S2 which may not have been listed in the 1956 roster? 2.What are Klasing brakes (I suspect that these are similar to the Ajax type)? 3. Did all these cars have steel roofwalks? The P2k cars come with plankless trucks,wood roofwalks and Ajax brakes as on their A-50-14 series DD cars. Is this combination in any way correct for either series of cars? Many thanks in advance Stefan Lerché Duncan, British Columbia Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|