MILW 80000 Series Gons
Michael Aufderheide
After these cars drifted into my brain last month, lo and behold
Classic Trains runs a photo of the MILW in the Northwest with 3! of these cars in one photo. "can't be that hard to make", I says to myself. Does anyone have a diagram they could post of this car? Seems like a couple of Westerfield #2500 40ft. composite cars could be turned into one. Regards, Mike
|
|
Re: Otto Perry movies
Richard Hendrickson
On Sep 20, 2005, at 9:33 PM, Rob Kirkham wrote:
I noticed Richard's comment that he was watching colour video transcriptionsMy wife ordered it for me from a commercial mail order catalog; it should be readily available in both videotape and DVD. The title is "Otto Perry's Santa Fe" and it was produced by the Rocky Mountain Railroad Club. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
B&O stenciling and decal nitpicking
lnbill <bwelch@...>
I am in the process of decaling Sunshine's B&O's M27f and M15k and I
notice that near the handgrabs on the left end of each side there is is a small rectangular stencil This is not included in the decals of either. Does a decal exit for this stencil somehwere in another set? Bill Welch
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
had been availableuntil last winter from Sunshine Models in urethane.< I believe that certain models that both Sunshine and Westerfield have in resin will be done in injection plastic. The guesses are which ones, when, and in my lifetime<G>. Plastic model makers try and guess which ones will sell enough of to have a profit. We are lucky in that we are seeing well done cars that we never expected to see. How long this lasts will be anybody's guess. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
roofs, was detail of AAR 1937 boxcar
Randy Hees <hees@...>
There was historically a difference between the roof structure (carlines and purlines) and the sheeting (double board wood, Murphy, etc.) so until recently strong and rigid are functions of the structure, while rust resistant, leak-proof and cinder-proof (or fire proof? (We lit a wooden car on fire over labor day weekend at our museum from cinders from a wood burning steam loco)) are functions of the sheeting. Considering how long double board roofs survived in service I sometimes wonder about leak-proof.
No argument on cheap or weight (but railroads were not historically aggressive about reducing weight as one might expect. One significant argument for narrow gauge was the reduced weight. I wonder about repair, forming, construction and transportation issues. Being railroad related industries, transportation wasn�t really a problem, and most shops had the ability to lift large items. In an industry which was casting locomotive and tender frames in a single pour, and dealt with boiler plate on a daily basis roofs would not have challenged the technology. I doubt that a typical shop tried to keep in stock replacement roof panels. More likely they would have either welded or riveted a patch, adapted the local common material, or ordered replacement material via the car owner if substantial repairs were needed. (or just scrapped the car and paid off the owner) Randy Hees
|
|
Re: cars that sell; was BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
eabracher@...
In a message dated 9/21/05 11:09:57 AM, califcoast@yahoo.com writes:
wasn't there a Roma WineI believe it was a Thomas kit. eric [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Daniel J Miller <djmiller@...>
Richard, Jon, and others,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Glad that's straightened out, and glad that (both!) the cars do appear to be correct. Thanks for all of the information. Dan Miller
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:34 AM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] Digest Number 2676 ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Jon, the lettering isn't always visible in the video (the REA cars were often quite grimy, but the evidence from the videos as well as from the still photos I have indicates that the practice of applying "Express Refrigerator" and the car number to the left of the doors only dated from before WW II. In all the postwar images I have where the lettering is visible, "Express Refrigerator" with the car number below is both left and right of the doors on both sides of the cars. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: Mather car Undeframes
Thomas M. Olsen <tmolsen@...>
List:
In regard to the Mather box and stock cars, there had been a remark during one of the discussions several months ago that the underframes on the urethane Mather kits from Sunshine Models were not correct. I do not remember anyone describing what was wrong with them, nor was there any reference to drawings of the correct underframes regarding the stock and box cars. Can anyone comment on what was wrong with the kits and where correct drawings of the underframes can be located? Tom Olsen 7 Boundary Road, West Branch Newark, Delaware, 19711-7479 (302) 738-4292 tmolsen@udel.edu
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Thomas M. Olsen <tmolsen@...>
The interesting thing is that both the ACF 1947 Welded cars (now
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
available from Branchline) and the Wood Sheathed General American cars (now available from Broadway Limited and Walther's) had been available until last winter from Sunshine Models in urethane. Martin discontinued them when he ran out of trucks and instruction sheets. Tom Olsen 7 Boundary Road, West Branch Newark, Delaware, 19711-7479 (302) 738-4292 tmolsen@udel.edu Jon Miller wrote:
"ExpressRefrigerator" and the car number to the left of the doors only dated
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Thomas M. Olsen <tmolsen@...>
In regard to the information on the REA equipment that I posted from the Roseman Book and the Sunshine instructions, the Branchline website also listed in-service dates for the red-white REA logo and other information regarding when changes were inaugurated for each painting and lettering phase that were mentioned in the September 2005 issue of the Keystone Modeler. I had mentioned this review to Ed Hawkins as he is still researching the inception dates. Here is his reply regarding Branchline's website information in regard to the red and white REA logo and it's initial in-service date:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
" Thomas, I've seen BT's dates as these are the same as given on their web site. I don't buy their 1953 date when the red and white diamond was first applied. My belief is that the date is 1955 based on accurately dated photos. This is the same year when the first batch of 500 steel cars came from General American (the Walthers steel express reefer with riveted sides). I still haven't come across any REA painting and stenciling drawings to confirm the date when this revision occurred. Ed" This is a vexing situation for those of us that model in the early 1950s. Part of the problem with photographs of these cars is the same that was talked about on this list in the last several weeks. That is the lack of dates and locations on many of the photographs that are in circulation from many of the people who are selling photographs at train shows and historical meets. As time passes and the original photos and negatives change hands, many of these photographs have gone undocumented and it is impossible to date them correctly. I have seen this many times over in hard and soft bound publications while I was making an index of photos of various classes of PRR locomotives and their locations with regard to my modeling period and territory. Credit being given to the wrong photographer and in many cases, not only is the date bogus, but the location and direction of the loco and/or train is also bogus. I have found many instances where the engine numbers changed from one publication to another, although it was the same locomotive photograph. Tom Olsen 7 Boundary Road, West Branch Newark, Delaware, 19711-7479 (302) 738-4292 tmolsen@udel.edu Daniel J Miller wrote:
Jon,
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Ed Hawkins
On Tuesday, September 20, 2005, at 09:32 PM, Randy wrote:
The main differences I can see between the Walthers & the BranchlineRandy, I think there's some confusion on what the intent of the subject matter is. The subject was comparing the Broadway Limited vs. the Walthers versions of the wood express refrigerator cars built by General American Car Co. in the late 1920s to about 1930. These models are supposed to be scale replicas of the same prototype car, thus the geometry should be identical if done correctly. There can and should be differences in appliances and such, due to upgrades and modifications that were made over their service lives, including different types of trucks. Branchline's REA and ACL express refrigerator model is based on an entirely different prototype car, which is a welded all-steel car built by AC&F in 1947-48. Walthers makes another REA model that is based on a riveted all-steel car built by GATC in 1955 and 1957. These two models are supposed to be different. Regards, Ed Hawkins
|
|
Re: C&S steel boxcar details
Rupert and Maureen <gamlenz@...>
Mark
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There is a photo on page 11 of Burlington Route Historical Society's Bulletin #7 - XM-32's - showing a painted post-war roof with large bare areas and a metal grating roofwalk, which was apparently fitted to all post war cars according to the caption. These cars were built at Havelock with #79-A trucks. There is a builder's photo of #1500 taken on 25 July 1957, and a photo of the same car 11 years later. One of the captions confirms that equipment trust plates were riveted to the upper left corner of each side. Hope this helps Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Heiden" <mark_heiden@hotmail.com> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 5:58 AM Subject: [STMFC] C&S, NKP steel boxcar details Hello everyone,
|
|
Otto Perry movies
Rob Kirkham <rdkirkham@...>
I noticed Richard's comment that he was watching colour video transcriptions of Otto Perry 16mm movies of the 40's and 50's. Are these commercially available from some where? Digital, per chance?
Rob Kirkham
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Randy
The main differences I can see between the Walthers & the Branchline
REA Express Reefers are 1. Different trucks 2. The roofs are shaped different, Walthers appears to be more rounded. 3. The ends are different. Where Walthers appear smooth, Branchlines are ribbed. This is going by the picture on Walthers website & the Branchline car I have in front of me. Branchline's pictures are on their website & match the car I have. http://www.branchline- trains.com/blueprint/expressreefers/express_reefers.htm Randy Jones SLC UT
|
|
Re: canadian on line statistics
PBowers <waiting@...>
At 01:21 AM 9/20/05, you wrote:
Thanks for your thought on that Walt. But if you are correct, what isIn my opinion, "Canadian owned foreign cars on home roads, 6,406" would probably be cars owned by CV, GT, GTW, CP/International of Maine etc. Peter Bowers -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.3/106 - Release Date: 9/19/05
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
"ExpressRefrigerator" and the car number to the left of the doors only dated from before WW II. In all the postwar images I have where the lettering is visible, "Express Refrigerator" with the car number below is both left and right of the doors on both sides of the cars.< Then that would make the BLI good for prewar and the Walthers good for postwar. Glad to know I purchased the right ones<VBG>. Also it means they really aren't the same time period, just very close. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Richard Hendrickson
On Sep 20, 2005, at 5:38 PM, Jon Miller wrote:
Jon, the lettering isn't always visible in the video (the REA cars were often quite grimy, but the evidence from the videos as well as from the still photos I have indicates that the practice of applying "Express Refrigerator" and the car number to the left of the doors only dated from before WW II. In all the postwar images I have where the lettering is visible, "Express Refrigerator" with the car number below is both left and right of the doors on both sides of the cars.I've just been looking atsome color video transcriptions of Otto Perry 16 mm movies made in the Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: Aluminum Freight Cars
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Those interested in this topic might like to peruse the article in _Railway Age_, Vol. 128 (Feb. 11, 1950), page 308, about the Roberval & Saguenay aluminum box car. It's interesting because it had an aluminum underframe (many American aluminum box cars and reefers had steel underframes). The aluminum was provided by Alcan. In the article, there is a photo of the underframe, and it's obvious that much deeper bolster and cross-bearer shapes provided the needed increase in stiffness to compensate for the lower elastic modulus of aluminum.
Anthony Thompson Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering University of California, Berkeley thompson@signaturepress.com
|
|
Re: BLI vs. Walthers express reefers
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
I've just been looking atsome color video transcriptions of Otto Perry 16 mm movies made in the late '40s and early '50s in which there numerous REA express reefers< Richard, Another question from those color shots (or any for that matter), were there two numbers or one on the side. Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
Re: Aluminum Freight Cars
Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
Manfred Lorenz wrote:
What kind of aluminum is used in car construction?In the late 1940s, the aluminum cars were mostly built of 65S, what we now call 6065, a heat-treatable alloy with moderate strength and very good corrosion resistance. I have often encountered the stuff that is used in window frames. WhichManfred, the stiffness (elastic modulus) does NOT depend on composition. It is very close to identical for ALL aluminum alloys. Perhaps you are confusing strength with stiffness. There are much stronger alloys than 6065 in both the 2000 and 7000 series of alloys. The original Duralumin was a 2000-series alloy (as we would term it today). One potential problem with these alloys is that as you make them stronger, their corrosion resistance tends to plummet. The PFE aluminum cars used 24S (now called 2024) for structural parts, but not in a maximum strength condition, I'm sure for corrosion reasons. What kind of properties does that harder variety have? Would it beWindows and other architectural trim aluminum is traditionally 6063, a fairly soft alloy that is easy to fabricate, especially by extrusion, and has good corrosion resistance. Strength is indeed pretty low. I would not want to use it even for side sheets on a freight car. Today there is an impressive range of alloys available in aluminum that could provide good combinations of strength and corrosion resistance; but as I said, not much you can do about the stiffness. Anthony Thompson Dept. of Materials Science & Engineering University of California, Berkeley thompson@signaturepress.com
|
|