Re: gondola interiors
Guy Wilber
Ed wrote:
Were gondola interiors ever cleaned? I think debris would accumulate for many years before it was discarded. Dunnage utilized in loading all types of open top loads would most certainly have been removed in order to prepare the next out bound load. No doubt scraps were scattered about and left, but the majority of larger pieces would have to be removed in order for loads to be set correctly and blocked for interchange. Has anyone ever seen a puddle in a gon or a picture of a gon? There are no holes for drainage. Though solid steel floor cars may not have been built with and sort of drain holes you can be sure that shortly into service they were riddled with holes utilized to secure loads. Torch cut holes in gon floors and sides was permitted (within reason), though the AAR's Arbitration Committee eventually put limits on the size of the holes. They were supposed to be less than an inch and a half but it's a sure bet that was ignored more than followed. By 1947 the Car Construction Committee approved drawings for tie down clips to be welded to car exteriors to help alleviate some of the hole cutting problems. The layout for the clips coupled with holes (1 1/16") bored into the top bulb and "Z" sections was adopted as a "recommended" practice in 1947 followed by an "alternate" design adopted in 1952. In the era when most exposed steel rusted I can understand why some railroads would order wood floors. The choice had little to do with rust. Wood floors offered shippers an easy way to secure dunnage. Later came combination steel and wood floors followed by complete installations of "nailable" steel floors. Were steel bands used in the steam era? Steel banding products were patented by a number of manufacturers beginning in the late 'teens. By the mid 1930s many AAR Open Top Loading Diagrams were listing steel bands as an "alternative" to high tension or "annealed" wire stranding. Both the steel and lumber industry were actively involved with the AAR's Loading Committee. Prior to, and during WWII most of the loading rules for both industries were revamped completely to utilize steel banding. Rule 6 for lumber loads secured with steel banding was adopted in 1940. Kind Regards, Guy Wilber West Bend, WI ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
|
|
DS/SS split, January 1945; PRR and NYC
laramielarry <ostresh@...>
Hi Folks
Here is the DS/SS/Steel split for box and auto cars for the PRR and NYC, 1945 and 1950: PRR: January 1945 PRR_____%____Number DS_____0.0%____0 SS_____21.2%____16,690 Steel_____78.8%____62,103 Known_____100.0%____78,793 Unknown_____0.0%____0 Total_____100.0%____78,793 July 1950 PRR_____%____Number DS_____0.0%____0 SS_____9.9%____6,489 Steel_____90.1%____59,156 Known_____100.0%____65,645 Unknown_____0.0%____0 Total_____100.0%____65,645 The Pennsy had no double sheathed cars in either year. Its single sheathed fleet declined by over 10,000 cars, and its steel cars dropped by another 3,000 for an overall decline of some 13,000 cars. NYC: The following tables are for box and auto cars with NYC reporting marks. January 1945 NYC_____%____Number DS_____8.3%____4,564 SS_____3.6%____1,963 Steel_____88.2%____48,710 Known_____100.0%____55,237 Unknown_____0.0%____5 Total_____100.0%____55,242 July 1950 NYC_____%____Number DS_____0.7%____475 SS_____0.6%____381 Steel_____98.7%____63,295 Known_____100.0%____64,151 Unknown_____0.0%____0 Total_____100.0%____64,151 DS cars were reduced by over 4,000; SS by 1,500. Steel grew by over 14,500 cars, however, for an overall gain of close to 9,000 cars. The following two tables are for the NYC and its lessees (as of December 31,1949), which includes cars with the following reporting marks: NYC, B&A, CASO, CCC&StL, MC, NOR, P&E, P&LE, PMcK&Y. January 1945 NYC+Lessees_____%____Number DS_____11.7%____7,782 SS_____3.0%____1,968 Steel_____85.3%____56,821 Known_____100.0%____66,571 Unknown_____0.0%____5 Total_____100.0%____66,576 July 1950 NYC+Lessees_____%____Number DS_____0.7%____523 SS_____0.5%____381 Steel_____98.7%____69,558 Known_____100.0%____70,462 Unknown_____0.0%____0 Total_____100.0%____70,462 The DS and SS fleets were dramatically reduced, steel increased, and the system as a whole grew by about 6%. Best wishes, Larry Ostresh Laramie, Wyoming
|
|
Re: gondola interiors
Ted Schnepf
Hi everyone,
I honestly believe this gondola dirty floor subject is being overdone. In scrap yard service it is true with magnet loading and unloading dirt does build up on the floor. In the classic era, gons in coal, aggregate and mineral service would be cleaned before loading, as the shipper did not want his product contaminated. All railroads had cleaning tracks for such work. Many coal mines cleaned cars on the empty side of the mine prior to loading. Also many gons at the receiving end were cleaned by laborers with shovels before release. Ted At 09:42 PM 10/9/2007, you wrote: ED,Rails Unlimited Ted Schnepf railsunl@sbcglobal.net 847-697-5353 or 5366 126 Will Scarlet Elgin, Ill. 60120 http://RailsUnlimited.ribbonrail.com/ Model Railroad Sales and Service with a personal touch. Books new and used. HO and O scales. DCC supplies. O scale urethane cars. Photos and darkroom services. Checks, cash (0%) or credit (secure server at web site 4% added). -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.6/1061 - Release Date: 10/10/2007 8:43 AM
|
|
Re: Question about IM trucks
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
One piece, the ones on the ATSF stock cars. I'm not counting the snap in brake rigging.
Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
DS/SS split, January 1945
laramielarry <ostresh@...>
Hi Folks
Here is the DS/SS/Steel split for January 1945, for box, auto, and ventilated cars in interchange service for U.S. Class 1 railroads and their lessees. Similar summaries for April 1949 and July 1950 are shown for comparative purposes. January 1945 Class 1_____%____Number DS_____22.7%____168,371 SS_____27.8%____206,319 Steel_____47.4%____352,421 Other_____0.8%____5,934 Known_____98.7%____733,045 Unknown_____1.3%____9,704 Total_____100.0%____742,749 April 1949 Class 1_____%____Number DS_____11.4%____83,441 SS_____23.7%____173,569 Steel_____64.0%____468,726 Other_____0.8%____5,574 Known_____99.9%____731,310 Unknown_____0.1%____933 Total_____100.0%____732,243 July 1950 Class 1_____%____Number DS_____9.2%____65,577 SS_____22.8%____162,309 Steel_____67.2%____477,784 Other_____0.7%____4,783 Known_____99.9%____710,453 Unknown_____0.1%____574 Total_____100.0%____711,027 The 1949 and 1950 summaries differ from previous lists I have published because in this case they include the lessees of Class 1 railroads, such as the Boston and Albany, Big Four, Michigan Central, etc., which I had formerly excluded. Note that there are nearly 10,000 cars in 1945 for which I do not know the sheathing type – nevertheless, close to 99% are "Known", which permits one to draw several conclusions: • Steel sheathed cars were a plurality, but not a majority, in 1945 – in 1950 they constituted over two-thirds of the fleet. • More than 60% of the double sheathed cars – over 100,000 – were retired between 1945 and 1950. About 44,000 single sheathed cars (21%) disappeared. Steel grew by over 125,000. The U.S. fleet declined by nearly 32,000 cars. • The ratio of DS to SS was 45%:55% in 1945; in 1950 it had dropped to 29%:71%. As time permits, I will present 1945 summary tables for individual railroads. Best wishes, Larry Ostresh Laramie, Wyoming
|
|
Re: Freight car classes
Russ Strodtz <railfreightcars@...>
Rich,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
As info the CB&Q did have a class system for freight cars but it was internal to the Mechanical Department and the classes were not lettered anywhere on the cars nor was there any listing generally available. The only comprehensive listing that I have located in the Mechanical Department archives was the original listing from the 20's when the system was created. That drawing was not, to my knowledge, ever updated. Cars belonging to the C&S and FW&D at times had CB&Q classes applied to them but only if they were identical to an equivalent CB&Q car. They had no system of their own. To the best of my knowledge the GN, NP, and SP&S had no such class system. Beyond the time frame of this list neither the BN nor the BNSF have any such system. The AT&SF did have a class system, lettered on the cars, and known to the railroad in general. It can not be determined from the SLSF drawings whether they did or did not have any class system. I have yet to figure out their system of organization of drawings much less anything like a class system. Russ
----- Original Message -----
From: <SUVCWORR@aol.com> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, 09 October, 2007 19:02 Subject: Re: [STMFC] Freight car classes In a message dated 10/9/2007 7:43:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time, destron@vcn.bc.ca writes:Also: what other roads used such a system of in-house classification forPRR see Rob Schoenberg's site for this information http://prr.railfan.net/freight/
|
|
Re: Question about IM trucks
SUVCWORR@...
In a message dated 10/10/2007 12:58:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
atsf@inow.com writes: Recently I received some IM stock cars from our good friend Andy. WhenJohn, Are these the newer one piece truck or the multiple piece truck? If the latter it is simply poor assembly techniques. These trucks have been a problem since they were first introduced and do show up on more recent runs occassionally. Rich Orr ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
|
|
Re: Question about IM trucks
Jon Miller <atsf@...>
Recently I received some IM stock cars from our good friend Andy. When installing .088 wheel sets I noticed that all the frames are out of plumb (correct word???). When the correct axle length was used one wheel would set about .020 to .030 high.
My question is what causes this, the part being taken out of the mold to soon? I'm quite sure the mold is correct! They said they would send me new parts but while talking to them they didn't seem to have any idea of what I was talking about. Has anyone else noticed this? Jon Miller AT&SF For me time has stopped in 1941 Digitrax, Chief/Zephyr systems, JMRI user NMRA Life member #2623 Member SFRH&MS
|
|
Naperville (and other convention) hotel rates
jaley <jaley@...>
All,
Here is a lesson that I learned, and I thought I'd pass it along to the rest of you. I just booked my room at the Naperville Holiday Inn for this year's Sunshine Models meet. When I called the 1-800 number, I was told that the $89 rate was "sold out" but I could get a room at their "discount rate" of "only" $160! So I called the Naperville Holiday Inn directly. The number at the top of the Sunshine Models flyer (kindly posted to STMFC Files by Ben Hom) gets you the guy who takes care of convention rooms. I asked him if there were any more rooms at the $89 rate, and he took care of me. The lesson here is: don't believe the 1-800 folks. If you can't get the rate you want, call the hotel directly. This also applies at Cocoa Beach (Prototype Rails), and likely applies at the other Prototype Modeling meets around the country. I look forward to seeing many of you in Naperville, and again in Cocoa Beach! Regards, -Jeff -- Jeff Aley jaley@pcocd2.intel.com DPG Chipsets Product Engineering Intel Corporation, Folsom, CA (916) 356-3533
|
|
Re: primer color
pierreoliver2003 <pierre.oliver@...>
It was also excellent for painted truck tires and rubber rims of
tank bogies. Haven't seen it in a very long time. Pierre Oliver --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Bud Rindfleisch <BlackDiamondRR@...> wrote: called "hot rod primer". It was not black and not grey but a nice dark grey colorthat I liked better than weathered or grimy black and it was thindo you know if anyone else sells such a color today?
|
|
Re: Naperville (and other convention) hotel rates
Charles Hladik
Jeff,
Most conventions ask that the attendees call the host hotel directly to get "the rate". Chuck Hladik ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
|
|
primer color
Bud Rindfleisch
Hi,
Years back Pactra used to sell spray cans of primer called "hot rod primer". It was not black and not grey but a nice dark grey color that I liked better than weathered or grimy black and it was thin pigmented...it didn't hide details. Has anyone else used this and do you know if anyone else sells such a color today? Bud Rindfleisch
|
|
Re: Freight car classes
Andy Sperandeo <asperandeo@...>
Hello Frank,
Car classes for AT&SF freight cars are listed in the book "Santa Fe Ry. Listing of Freight Cars By Class and Car Number," by Larry Occhiello. It was published jointly by the Santa Fe Modelers' Organization and the Santa Fe Ry. Historical Society in 1991, but is unfortunately out of print today. Other books available at the Santa Fe society's Web site, atsfrr,net, give class designations for particular types of cars, such as ice refrigerators, boxcars, furniture and automobile cars, and tank cars, but the Occhiello book, which is based on the railroad's own "live lists" for various years, is the only comprehensive reference. So long, Andy Andy Sperandeo Executive Editor Model Railroader magazine asperandeo@mrmag.com 262-796-8776, ext. 461 FAX 262-796-1142
|
|
Re: gondola interiors
jim_mischke <jmischke@...>
I keep sweepings from my work bench in a shoe box. A delightful
assortment of grunge, squiggly things and whatsits. A light smattering of the fines is debris. More is a load. Needs to be dyed or painted crimson (old rust), brown (really old rust) and orange (fresh rust, not much of this). --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "ed_mines" <ed_mines@...> wrote: <snip> <snip>
|
|
Re: Freight car classes
jim_mischke <jmischke@...>
The B&OHS (www.borhs.org) sells a book in their Company
Store, "Freight Car Equipment 1917-1960" by Richard K. Daniels. It is a printed spreadsheet of information found in each annual B&O Summary of Equipment by type and class. Check the B&OHS Company Store listings, stock number 74001, $14 plus shipping. --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Ferko" <destron@...> wrote: freight cars for each series of running numbers of the ATSF, UP and theB&O? I'd most specifically be interested in the cars of the early 1950 (1950-1953). classification for cars?
|
|
Re: Naperville 2008
skibbs4 <mmrace4@...>
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, Anthony Thompson <thompson@...> wrote:
We have been moving "forward" in days, away from Halloween, but Martinmay or may not continue that next year.Isn't it always the last weekend in October, no matter what day of the week Halloween falls on? Can't imagine 2008 would be any different. Mike Skibbe
|
|
Steam Era Books
Barry Bennett <Barrybennetttoo@...>
Hiya
Smith's Model Engines Rail Books on eBay has some interesting books at interesting prices, providing you are prepared to pay transatlantic postage. Cheers Barry Bennett
|
|
Re: Freight car classes
laramielarry <ostresh@...>
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Ferko" <destron@...> wrote:
Is there a list somewhere that gives the class designations forfreight cars for each series of running numbers of the ATSF, UP and the B&O?Terry Metcalfe's book "Union Pacific Freight Cars: 1936-51" has this information for the U.P. roster as of October 1951. I can send you an Excel file version, if you want it. Larry Ostresh Laramie, Wyoming
|
|
Re: Freight car classes
al_brown03
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Ferko" <destron@...> wrote:
<snip> Also: what other roads used such a system of in-house classificationfor cars?SAL and ACL both had freight-car classes, though Seaboard was a tad casual about them. Some cars didn't have classes (e.g. the GF&A boxcars); most of the boxcars re-built to stock cars were re-classified but IIRC at least one wasn't. Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.
|
|
Re: [SPAM] gondola interiors
Schuyler Larrabee
Ed Mines queried:
What do you guys use as debris in your models? Scrap stripwood, simulating blocking, and some fine sand from the street outside. Glued in with diluted white glue. As yet, the rain hasn't loosened up the glue . . .8^) SGL
|
|