Date   

Atlas ARA/AAR 1932 Boxcar

charmantas
 

The one problem with a Bangor and Aroostook offering is that most of
these 1932 boxcars had 4/4 Dreadnaught ends, while BAR had 4/5 ends.
So I don't look for Atlas to do a BAR version.

Charles Harmantas


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

John Hile <john66h@...>
 

--- In STMFC@..., Ed Hawkins <hawk0621@...> wrote:


Ted Culotta published a thoroughly researched
267-page book on the subject of these box cars.
Thanks Ed, I have Ted's book on the shelf, and used it as my primary
source. My post was mostly about seeing if anyone else was comparing
the Atlas car to its prototypes, anticipating what modifications may
be required, etc.

-John Hile


Re: Branchline Yardmaster

Tim O'Connor
 

The 1932 car is 6" shorter than the 1937 AAR box car, and 12" shorter than
the PS-1. Not to mention other differences!

Obviously Atlas thinks there is a market for this model. A few railroads had
no 1937 box cars -- MP (gee, that's one of the roadnames), IGN, StLB&M (ok
all the MP subs). But also BAR. BAR also had no 40' PS-1's or "modified
1937 AAR" box cars (the 10'6" version) either. I expect most MP and BAR
fans will be pretty happy about this new model.

If the riveted end version matches Seaboard cars, then those modelers
are gonna be pretty happy too.

Tim O'

-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "ed_mines" <ed_mines@...>
The Branchline Yardmaster cars retail for $11 & the new Athearn RTR 40
ft. box cars retail for $14.

Considering most Atlas freight cars are in the $10-$15 range and the
appearance of the car in the picture they seem expensive to me.

The Kadee costs about $30; the quality of the model in the picture is
certainly not comparable to them.

Ed


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

SUVCWORR@...
 

In a message dated 3/4/2008 6:30:05 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
atsf@... writes:

The Clinchfield car which is the test shot looks good for the top
picture on page 94 of Ted's book. Something looks wrong about the truck
compared to the picture.
While the 8-37 data is good for me the date on the Atlas car is
unreadable to me but it looked like 8-47 (hope not).



The photo is gone. If you right click where it should be and check the
properties, you will see that it is unavailable.

Rich Orr



**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)


Re: Express Reefer shipments

Malcolm Laughlin <mlaughlinnyc@...>
 

Posted by: "Tim O'Connor Jeff

Yes, I think the railroad could deliver an express reefer to almost any freight depot or team track along a passenger train route for unloading (or even sale) by a wholesaler. I supposeit's even possible the express reefer could be moved to the unloading spot by a wayfreight. Union rules might have limited the railroad's options in such cases (i.e. do you pay extra wages to the passenger train crew because they have to deliver an express car?)
-----------

I think I can answer the work rules question. A passenger train could pick up or drop a car at any passneger station where there was not a switch engine on duty. The knid of car didn’t matter. But of course you wouldn’t see that happening with an ordinary freight car that didn’t have steam or train signal line connections. As for a passenger train doing that work at a team track or freight station, I’ve not heard of it – seems like a very gray area in regard to work rules. My suspicion is that the crew would claim a day at local freight wages if required to do that. The claim would be denied by management and most likely awarded when it got to the NRAB level.



Malcolm Laughlin, Editor 617-489-4383
New England Rail Shipper Directories
19 Holden Road, Belmont, MA 02478

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Branchline Yardmaster

ed_mines
 

The Branchline Yardmaster cars retail for $11 & the new Athearn RTR 40
ft. box cars retail for $14.

Considering most Atlas freight cars are in the $10-$15 range and the
appearance of the car in the picture they seem expensive to me.

The Kadee costs about $30; the quality of the model in the picture is
certainly not comparable to them.

Ed


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

Ed Hawkins
 

On Mar 4, 2008, at 1:02 PM, John Hile wrote:

I did a little research on these back in December and came up with the
following notes. Additional info is always appreciated.
John,
In case you aren't aware, Ted Culotta published a thoroughly researched
267-page book on the subject of these box cars. It contains builder's
photos, in-service photos, information on the appliances, paint specs
to the extent they were available, etc.
Regards,
Ed Hawkins


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

Tim O'Connor
 

Ben is quite right that the 1932 design is distinctly different from
the earlier, and later, all-steel cars. For my part I have no use for it,
since I have kits from Sunshine for several prototype cars, and in
my experience, very few plastic kits can hold a candle to Frank
Hodina's resin work. But I'm sure these will be popping up on
steam era club layouts since they are very appropriate.

The Atlas drawings look kinda clunky -- almost like 3-rail cars
scaled down, or N-scale cars scaled up. Has anyone seen an
actual model or at least a test shot?

Tim O'Connor

-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "ed_mines" <ed_mines@...>

Members of our group might pay a premium for a slightly different car.
I wonder if the average model railroader would.


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
 

Ed Mines wrote:
"For the car with a rectangular panel Murphy roof I meant Athearn,
Intermountain & Red Caboose and for the flat panel roof I meant Red
Caboose."

NONE of these models are 1932 ARA boxcars, though. And I'm wondering
what model you're calling the Red Caboose flat panel roof boxcar. If
you mean the PRR Class X29/1923 proposed ARA boxcar, that's NOT a 1932
ARA boxcar either. What's your point?


Ben Hom


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

ed_mines
 

--- In STMFC@..., "Brian J Carlson" <brian@...> wrote:
Where? The only 1932 ARA cars I am aware of are the resin offerings
from F&C
and Sunshine.
For the car with a rectangular panel Murphy roof I meant Athearn,
Intermountain & Red Caboose and for the flat panel roof I meant Red
Caboose.

Members of our group might pay a premium for a slightly different car.
I wonder if the average model railroader would.

I guess you're right though; an assembled Intermountain box car costs
as much.

Ed


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

SUVCWORR@...
 

In a message dated 3/4/2008 12:37:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
smithbf@... writes:

What cars are you thinking of? The only other 1932 ARA cars I'm
aware of in HO are the resin kits by Sunshine and F&C and at least
for the Sunshine kits, their price is comparable to the Atlas RTR price.





Bruce,

Since the photos are no longer on Atlas web site, how close is this to the
PRR X35?

Rich Orr



**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

John Hile <john66h@...>
 

I did a little research on these back in December and came up with the
following notes. Additional info is always appreciated.

C.G. 4000-4499, 488 cars 1/53, miner hb, spring-plankless truck
(tichy/life-like), no poling pocket tabs

CRR 5000-5249, 246 cars 1/53, klasing hb, spring-plankless truck
(intermountain), poling pockets & tabs

I-GN 17001-17300, 265 50t cars & 31 40t cars 1/53, universal hb,
spring-plankless truck (tichy/life-like), end tabs but no poling
pockets, union duplex door hardware

MEC 4248-4499, 247 cars 1/53, ajax hb, cast steel truck w/spring plank
(atlas?)

WRTCo 900-919, 20 cars 1/53, ureco hb, cast steel truck w/spring plank
(atlas?) no poling pocket tabs, 6" greater center-to-center truck spacing

The CRR model on the Atlas site appears to match the notes above with
the exception of the hand brake and trucks...miner? and cast steel
with spring plank on the model. I am curious to see if the WRTCo car
will have the wider truck spacing.


-John Hile


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

seaboard_1966
 

Here is one for the SAL fans out there. WrightTRAK is going to have the vents for modelers who wish to build some SAL ventilated express cars. These are Wine Vents and will be good for many other uses as well.

Denis Blake
Marysville, OH

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Smith" <smithbf@...>
To: <STMFC@...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale



On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:11 AM, ed_mines wrote:

Seems a little pricy, particularly when there are similar, less
expensive versions of similar cars.
What cars are you thinking of? The only other 1932 ARA cars I'm
aware of in HO are the resin kits by Sunshine and F&C and at least
for the Sunshine kits, their price is comparable to the Atlas RTR price.

Regards
Bruce

Bruce F. Smith
Auburn, AL
http://www.vetmed.auburn.edu/index.pl/bruce_f._smith2

"Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield."
__
/ &#92;
__<+--+>________________&#92;__/___ ________________________________
|- ______/ O O &#92;_______ -| | __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ |
| / 4999 PENNSYLVANIA 4999 &#92; | ||__||__||__||__||__||__||__||__||
|/_____________________________&#92;|_|________________________________|
| O--O &#92;0 0 0 0/ O--O | 0-0-0 0-0-0





Yahoo! Groups Links





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.4/1310 - Release Date: 3/4/2008 8:35 AM


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

Carl J. Marsico <Carlmarsico@...>
 

IMHO, the newly-tooled Athearn RTR cars have better "detail to cost" ratio than alot of the recent Atlas "non-Trainman" offerings.

CJM

Brian J Carlson <brian@...> wrote:
Ed Mines said:

Seems a little pricy, particularly when there are similar, less
expensive versions of similar cars.
Where? The only 1932 ARA cars I am aware of are the resin offerings from F&C
and Sunshine. Granted F&C can be bought cheaper at shows but I don't
consider the Atlas prices excessive for RTR plastic.

Brian Carlson


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

Bruce Smith
 

On Mar 4, 2008, at 11:11 AM, ed_mines wrote:

Seems a little pricy, particularly when there are similar, less
expensive versions of similar cars.
What cars are you thinking of? The only other 1932 ARA cars I'm aware of in HO are the resin kits by Sunshine and F&C and at least for the Sunshine kits, their price is comparable to the Atlas RTR price.

Regards
Bruce

Bruce F. Smith
Auburn, AL
http://www.vetmed.auburn.edu/index.pl/bruce_f._smith2

"Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield."
__
/ &#92;
__<+--+>________________&#92;__/___ ________________________________
|- ______/ O O &#92;_______ -| | __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ |
| / 4999 PENNSYLVANIA 4999 &#92; | ||__||__||__||__||__||__||__||__||
|/_____________________________&#92;|_|________________________________|
| O--O &#92;0 0 0 0/ O--O | 0-0-0 0-0-0


Re: Boxcar build dates?

benjaminfrank_hom <b.hom@...>
 

Frank Valoczy wrote:
"I'm looking for information as to when the following cars were built:
CNJ 33781
D&H 22962
ELS 7000 and 7096"

D&H 22962 was from D&H's large order of 36 ft DS steel underframe
boxcars in 1906-07. Be advised that the D&H had an aggresive rolling
stock rebuilding program, and the Hutchins ends on this car are one of
a variety of ends applied to these cars during the 1920s and 1930s.
They are not original to this car.


Ben Hom


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

Brian J Carlson <brian@...>
 

Ed Mines said:

Seems a little pricy, particularly when there are similar, less
expensive versions of similar cars.
Where? The only 1932 ARA cars I am aware of are the resin offerings from F&C
and Sunshine. Granted F&C can be bought cheaper at shows but I don't
consider the Atlas prices excessive for RTR plastic.

Brian Carlson


Re: New Atlas Model: 1932 ARA Boxcar, HO Scale

ed_mines
 

Seems a little pricy, particularly when there are similar, less
expensive versions of similar cars.

Ed


Re: SP-B-50-15 box car

Steve Lucas <stevelucas3@...>
 

When you think about where a wheel tread is when a car is moving on
tangent track, the centre of the wheel tread would be a sensible
location to take a wheel diameter measurement, as most of a car or
loco wheel wear occurs at the centre of the tread.

Steve Lucas.

--- In STMFC@..., "Mike Brock" <brockm@...> wrote:


Tim O'Connor asks:


"?? Mike, if the diameter is measured halfway into the tread,
wouldn't
the actual diameter of the wheel be LARGER? And of course the flange
depth marks the ultimate extremity of the wheel diameter..."

Consider a "33" wheel. The measurement being taken halfway into the
tread
would mean that, at that point, the wheel is 33" in diameter. At
that point
the tread is about 0.25" "wider" than at the wheel's face. To
clarify, draw
a line through the wheel's center such that the line intersects the
tread on
the right side and the left side of the wheel as you view the wheel
from its
side...looking directly at its face. The total wheel width at that
point on
the tread is 0.5" wider than the wheel's face. The flange...if I
recall
correctly...is about 1" deep so the face reads 32.5" wide, the
tread 33"
wide, and the flange 35" wide.

Mike Brock


Re: Branchline Yardmaster

Charles Hladik
 

ED,
Let's see now, Branchline and Athearn cars with cast on detail, compared
to cars with separate detail. How can you justify that comparison? It just
doesn't work.


Chuck Hladik
Rutland Railroad
Virginia Division
NMRA L5756



**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)

126581 - 126600 of 197109