Re: DL&W 53000-53259
Brian
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
See email from Rich Burg on 8/27/2009.
At 9/7/2009 08:25 PM Monday, you wrote:
All:
|
|
Re: 33 inch wheels
Brian Paul Ehni <behni@...>
There¹s a whole Monty Python routine there, but I am loathe to incur the
moderator¹s wrath. -- Thanks! Brian Ehni From: roblmclear <rob.mclear2@...> Reply-To: STMFC List <STMFC@...> Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:02:24 -0000 To: STMFC List <STMFC@...> Subject: [STMFC] Re: 33 inch wheels Well Al, what did the romans ever do for us? Rob. --- In STMFC@... <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> , water.kresse@... wrote:
|
|
DL&W 53000-53259
Brian Carlson <brian@...>
All:
I got the below from another list. Does anyone have any more information, or know a way I can find out what type of trucks are being referred to by the side frame pattern? The DL&W Freight Car Classification book lists the details for these cars as follows: "100 cars have A.S.F. side frame pattern No. 21359-AE..." "150 cars have Symington-Gould side frame pattern No. TF-5318..." No mention is made whether or not a particular batch from the series got which sideframes... Brian J. Carlson, P.E. Cheektowaga NY
|
|
Re: 33 inch wheels
roblmclear <rob.mclear2@...>
Well Al, what did the romans ever do for us?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Rob.
--- In STMFC@..., water.kresse@... wrote:
|
|
Great Northern 34'-4" coal & ore car, Series 180371-180766
gary laakso
I am working on the Funaro & Camerlengo version of this car (its from the 1995 AW Enterprises urethane kit of this car) and noticed that it omits the 40 rivets on the side sill wood beam shown in the book Great Northern Lines East book at page 184. Plus, both versions of the kits omitted the outside airline. Eyeballing the that picture, it appears that the Arch Decals size .014 rivets are the closest in size. It looks like the air brake pipe holders can be the odd round head part used for holding the grab iron on the end walks. I have not located any area to hold any weight, so this car will need a coal load, so the top of the car braces will have to be added after the coal load is inside covering a weight.
If these modifications work, I will need to update my 1995 version of this kit, though i likes its Central Valley archbar trucks. One question, the rear of the car shown in the picture only shows the car number, not the GN reporting marks. Is that unusual for this type of car? gary laakso south of Mike Brock vasa0vasa@...
|
|
Bridge & Building Cars Available For Research
thecitrusbelt <thecitrusbelt@...>
While attending this past week's Pacific Southwest Region/NMRA Convention in Las Vegas, NV, I came across a retired Union Pacific caboose (25330?) and two pre-1920 UP bridge & building maintenance cars. The two B & B cars were built in Las Vegas specifically as B & B cars, I was told.
The owner's husband is a car broker in the Las Vegas area and acquired the cars through some of his dealings. The owner is using the B & B cars for storage. If anyone is interested in doing on-site research the owner is agreeable to allowing access. Please contact me OFF LIST and I will provide the contact information. By the way, there is a former Santa Fe light weight coach (2913), as well as a G scale garden railroad at this location. Bob Chaparro Hemet, CA
|
|
Re: ORER QUESTION
leakinmywaders
Tim and Brian: When I referred to the DTI's 40-ft X31c double door round roof boxcars as "clones" on another list, I was corrected by Rich Orr, who said it thusly:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In PRRPro@..., SUVCWORR@... wrote:
... These were not X31 clones. The were X31 and subclass cars which werethe DT&I. The cars were carried in the PRR listings in the ORER for a period oftime with a note leased to DT&I. I don't have or have access to the issue ofthe ORER when they were dropped so I can't tell when the sale took place.So taking this and additional info from NP records, it appears these boxcars were built in 1937 by Greenville Steel Co. to PRR plans and for the PRR as original owner. They were popular cars; DT&I bought them after their initial lease, and after the DT&I sold them to A.A. Morrison in the 1960s for lease to the NP, that road too later bought them. These were among the few lots among the many refurbished boxcars it leased that the NP decided were worth purchasing outright. I'm presently working on an article on the NP's X31 design leaser boxcars and if anyone has further information on their history, or can offer up a publishable in-service photograph in their DT&I life, I'd much appreciate hearing about it. Chris Frissell Polson, MT --- In STMFC@..., Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: 33 inch wheels
Charles Hladik
They gave us the "Railroad Roman" font, of course.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Chuck Hladik
In a message dated 9/7/2009 7:02:52 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
rob.mclear2@... writes: Well Al, what did the romans ever do for us? Rob. --- In _STMFC@... (mailto:STMFC@...) , water.kresse@, wate
Subject: [STMFC] 33 inch wheelscars?
|
|
Re: 33 inch wheels
water.kresse@...
Can we blame it on the Romans?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Al Kresse
----- Original Message -----
From: "snoqualmier" <leethwaits@...> To: STMFC@... Sent: Monday, September 7, 2009 11:33:33 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [STMFC] 33 inch wheels Why and when did the use of 33 inch wheels become standard on freight cars? Lee
|
|
Re: 33 inch wheels
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
Maybe not the particular "Why?" you were looking for, but the analysis of contact stresses between two objects favors two flat surfaces touching each other. Failing that, with one surface flat (the rail) and the other not (the wheel), stresses are minimized and the load carrying capability maximized when the wheel is as large as possible. Rolling resistance is also reduced with larger wheels. The standard size nowadays is 36 inches, I think, but many double stack cars - like depressed center cars in the steam era - use 28 inch wheels to gain extra room for cargo under the clearance limits.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Why 33 rather than 32 or 34? I dunno, but they seem to have settled on that number very early on. KL
----- Original Message -----
From: snoqualmier Why and when did the use of 33 inch wheels become standard on freight cars?
|
|
33 inch wheels
snoqualmier <leethwaits@...>
Why and when did the use of 33 inch wheels become standard on freight cars?
Lee
|
|
Re: Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car
Denny Anspach <danspach@...>
Tim O'C. expresses a need for protective devices, i.e. protective of ham-handedness, that will screw into bolster holes during kit construction. An easy device that will at least partly serve this purpose is the routine install of a pair of empty plastic truck frames. I keep a cup full of these discards around for just such purposes.
Denny Denny S. Anspach MD Okoboji, IA
|
|
Re: Naperville meet oct. 2009 -share a room
Joseph Lofland
Richard,
Dave passed me on to you. I'm lookint for a romate. I have the room reserved. Are you intedresterd stoill? Joe Lofland On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Richard Hendrickson < rhendrickson@...> wrote:
|
|
1913 & 1917 ORERs
Mark Mathu
Full versions of the 2/1913 & 6/1917 Official Railway Equipment Registers
are on-line at Google Books: http://books.google.com/books?q=%22official+railway+equipment+register%22&as _brr=1 __________ Mark Mathu Whitefish Bay, Wis. The Green Bay Route: http://www.greenbayroute.com/
|
|
Re: Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car
Brian Carlson <brian@...>
Yes, noticed that, but to be honest, if the model is on the track no one
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
notices. I'll have my Protowest car and the IM car with me at Naperville, as a side by side comparison. Brian J. Carlson, P.E. Cheektowaga NY
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of rwitt_2000 Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 9:03 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: [STMFC] Re: Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car
|
|
Re: Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car
rwitt_2000
--- In STMFC@..., "Brian Carlson" <brian@...> wrote:
you did it, except I managed to not break any stirrups or the air hoses. I didsand two fingernails though. Maybe the next runs will compensate for thetape thickness. I used Barge cement to reattach my deck. I have had toomany issues with ACC popping due to different shrinkage and expansionrates. Bruce and Brian, Thanks for the advice about removing the wood deck. Have other also noticed that the InterMountain AAR flat car model lacks the "floor stringers". The resin model from ProtoWest Models does model them as they appear on the drawing of the flat car designed for the ERIE RR. Bob Witt Indianapolis, Indiana
|
|
Tichy Bolsters was..RE: Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car
Brian Carlson <brian@...>
Be careful with these. I "pressed" one into a bolster and on removal it
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
broke, causing me to have to re-drill and tap the screw hole. I modified them by inserting longer 2-56 screws from the bottom and screwing them into the bolsters now when I use them. Brian J. Carlson, P.E. Cheektowaga NY
-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Rob Kirkham Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 6:26 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: Re: [STMFC] Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car I think Tichy includes a pair of small T shaped plastic parts in the USRA SS kit that would work to protect some of the underbody. They press fit into the bolsters until the trucks are ready to be applied. I do not see a reason you couldn't insert them (without glue of course) and then glue their bases to some .06" styrene sheet cut a little wider than the outline of the car (looking from the track up). It wouldn't stop every ding, but most of them. Rob Kirkham -------------------------------------------------- From: "Tim O'Connor" <timboconnor@...> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:54 AM To: <STMFC@...> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car All this handling has resulted in two more repairs. Both the air hoses ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Re: Naperville meet oct. 2009 -share a room
Richard Hendrickson
On Sep 3, 2009, at 4:26 PM, up4884114152002 wrote:
My name is Dave Friedman and I am looking for someoneDave, I've been out of town for three days, so I'm late responding, and you probably have a roommate lined up by now. But if not, I'll be arriving Thursday night, leaving Sunday, and would be pleased to share a room with you. (PS: I don't snore). Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car
Robert kirkham
I think Tichy includes a pair of small T shaped plastic parts in the USRA SS kit that would work to protect some of the underbody. They press fit into the bolsters until the trucks are ready to be applied. I do not see a reason you couldn't insert them (without glue of course) and then glue their bases to some .06" styrene sheet cut a little wider than the outline of the car (looking from the track up). It wouldn't stop every ding, but most of them.
Rob Kirkham -------------------------------------------------- From: "Tim O'Connor" <timboconnor@...> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 10:54 AM To: <STMFC@...> Subject: Re: [STMFC] Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car All this handling has resulted in two more repairs. Both the air hoses
|
|
Re: Update - IM Santa Fe Ft-V flat car
mcindoefalls
--- In STMFC@..., Tim O'Connor <timboconnor@...> wrote:
Bruce, I need a tool item as follows: a device that screws intoTim, I can't exactly picture what this "tool" would look like, but I understand your goal. Couldn't something be cobbled up from relatively thick (.060, maybe?) styrene? Walt Lankenau
|
|