Re: Photos of interest
water.kresse@...
Those three ring binders get heavy!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan" <sjones1@...> To: STMFC@... Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:41:08 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [STMFC] Re: Photos of interest It would have taken most of the Springfield show just to go through all the material he brought there. But it was organized only by railroad. In my case he had both the Grand Trunk Western (not my interest) and the Grand Trunk New England Lines (my interest) mixed together. Not that I didn't find some photos to spend money on, mind you. --- In STMFC@..., "Brian J Carlson" <prrk41361@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Photos of interest
jonespwr
It would have taken most of the Springfield show just to go through all the material he brought there. But it was organized only by railroad. In my case he had both the Grand Trunk Western (not my interest) and the Grand Trunk New England Lines (my interest) mixed together. Not that I didn't find some photos to spend money on, mind you.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
--- In STMFC@..., "Brian J Carlson" <prrk41361@...> wrote:
|
|
Magazine question
Frank Valoczy <destron@...>
Hi,
Wondering if anyone might have any or all of these magazines that they'd sell? RMC: April 82 Mainline: May 84, Dec 84, Aug 86, Oct 86 RMJ: Nov 89 Thanks. Frank Valoczy Vancouver, BC
|
|
Re: Photos of interest
He told me He used to take Everything to W. Springfield but since he moved south not sure he still does.
Brian J. Carlson, P.E. Cheektowaga NY From: STMFC@... [mailto:STMFC@...] On Behalf Of Al and Patricia Westerfield Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:08 PM To: STMFC@... Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: Photos of interest Schuyler - Bob's collection is so big he can't bring everything to shows. He estimated to me it's about 1/3rd. If you really want to look for something specific, contact him ahead of time so he can bring it. He will also welcome visitors at convenient times to his house for serious collectors. - Al Westerfield
|
|
Re: Photos of interest
Al and Patricia Westerfield <westerfield@...>
Schuyler - Bob's collection is so big he can't bring everything to shows. He estimated to me it's about 1/3rd. If you really want to look for something specific, contact him ahead of time so he can bring it. He will also welcome visitors at convenient times to his house for serious collectors. - Al Westerfield
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: Schuyler Larrabee To: STMFC@... Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:59 PM Subject: RE: [STMFC] Re: Photos of interest Bob also brings EVERYTHING to the Cocoa Beach meet, and I believe to Naperville too. He has an email address which I believe is bobsphoto.train.@... . If you email, he will bring the appropriate volumes of photos to the show you are going to attend. I am fairly sure that the telephone number I have for him is no longer the correct one. SGL Bob's Photo is out of Wallingford, KY. He has a fantastic collection of freight car photos . . . most from the 40 and 50s. Remember, $7 for B&Ws and $10 for color photos is not out of the normal range these days. You might want to call him ahead of time if you are looking for specific railroads and you are not in their territory. He usually brings a van's worth to shows. He and Jay Williams (Indiana) always seem to have something new it seems. In the mid-west Rich Burg is back in it again and Bob Lorenz sometimes shows up. Who else has freight car photos that might include those of the Kentucky and West Virginia coal hauling railroads in the 1930-50s? Al Kresse ----- Original Message ----- From: "fltenwheeler" <floridatenwheeler@... <mailto:floridatenwheeler%40verizon.net> > To: STMFC@... <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:44:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [STMFC] Re: Photos of interest OK I need to ask. I have seen the reference to Bob's photos. What or who? What is available? Thanks Tim > > $5 for a color 8x10 print is a lot cheaper than Bob's! > > Good thing Bob's collection is not online, or a lot of > us would go broke! > > Tim O'Connor [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514) Database version: 6.14330 http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ <http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514) Database version: 6.14330 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Photos of interest
Actually Schuyler, he does not bring anything close to "everything" to
either of those meets. He brings an extensive selection, but it is just a fraction of what he has. Regards Bruce Smith Auburn, AL PM >>>"Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee@...> 02/10/10 10:00 Bob also brings EVERYTHING to the Cocoa Beach meet, and I believe to Naperville too. He has an email address which I believe is bobsphoto.train.@... . If you email, he will bring the appropriate volumes of photos to the show you are going to attend. I am fairly sure that the telephone number I have for him is no longer the correct one.
|
|
Re: Photos of interest
Schuyler Larrabee
Bob also brings EVERYTHING to the Cocoa Beach meet, and I believe to Naperville too. He has an email address which I believe is bobsphoto.train.@... . If you email, he will bring the appropriate volumes of photos to the show you are going to attend. I am fairly sure that the telephone number I have for him is no longer the correct one.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
SGL Bob's Photo is out of Wallingford, KY. He has a fantastic collection of freight car photos . . . most from the 40 and 50s. Remember, $7 for B&Ws and $10 for color photos is not out of the normal range these days. You might want to call him ahead of time if you are looking for specific railroads and you are not in their territory. He usually brings a van's worth to shows. He and Jay Williams (Indiana) always seem to have something new it seems. In the mid-west Rich Burg is back in it again and Bob Lorenz sometimes shows up. Who else has freight car photos that might include those of the Kentucky and West Virginia coal hauling railroads in the 1930-50s? Al Kresse
----- Original Message -----
From: "fltenwheeler" <floridatenwheeler@... <mailto:floridatenwheeler%40verizon.net> > To: STMFC@... <mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:44:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [STMFC] Re: Photos of interest OK I need to ask. I have seen the reference to Bob's photos. What or who? What is available? Thanks Tim [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514) Database version: 6.14330 http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ <http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514) Database version: 6.14330 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Photos of interest
water.kresse@...
Bob's Photo is out of Wallingford, KY. He has a fantastic collection of freight car photos . . . most from the 40 and 50s. Remember, $7 for B&Ws and $10 for color photos is not out of the normal range these days. You might want to call him ahead of time if you are looking for specific railroads and you are not in their territory. He usually brings a van's worth to shows. He and Jay Williams (Indiana) always seem to have something new it seems. In the mid-west Rich Burg is back in it again and Bob Lorenz sometimes shows up.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Who else has freight car photos that might include those of the Kentucky and West Virginia coal hauling railroads in the 1930-50s? Al Kresse
----- Original Message -----
From: "fltenwheeler" <floridatenwheeler@...> To: STMFC@... Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:44:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [STMFC] Re: Photos of interest OK I need to ask. I have seen the reference to Bob's photos. What or who? What is available? Thanks Tim
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity
Scott Seders
That is what I thought when I first heard of his troubles.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I would have thought had there been a significant problem with scale size couplers there would have been an outcry about it on the net. Scott Seders Schuyler Larrabee wrote:
Scott, your friend needs to improve his track. 58s and their cousins operate fine on my club layout and the improvement in appearance makes the care in trackwork worthwhile.
|
|
Re: Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity
Schuyler Larrabee
Scott, your friend needs to improve his track. 58s and their cousins operate fine on my club layout and the improvement in appearance makes the care in trackwork worthwhile.
YMMV, of course. SGL I have been using Kadee scale couplers on all of my rolling stock. Currently, I do not have a layout. I have a friend (who is a very good modeler) who claims that he is having difficulty with scale couplers uncoupling where there is any height irregularity in the track. As such he as gone back to using number 5 couplers. What is anyone else experiencing? Thanks, Scott Seders [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514) Database version: 6.14320 http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ <http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.514) Database version: 6.14330 http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Photos of interest
Tim Meyer
OK I need to ask. I have seen the reference to Bob's photos. What or who? What is available?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks Tim
|
|
News on Ed DeRouin
Gary Roe
To All,
I received the below message just a little while ago from another list. I know that, like me, a number of you know Ed; and will want to know of this development, even tho it is very bad news. gary roe quincy, illinois _____ From: CBQ@... [mailto:CBQ@...] On Behalf Of Dave Lotz Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:17 PM To: CBQ@...; brhslist@... Subject: [CBQ] News on Ed DeRouin Hi all, I have some sad news regarding Ed DeRouin, fellow Burlington fan, author and publisher. Ed has been either hospitalized or in a care facility since Christmas Eve and has recently been diagnosed with a very rare bone cancer. The initial plan was for radiation and chemotherapy, however Ed had a particularly bad reaction to the chemo drug and it has been decided to stop the treatment and make him as comfortable as possible. Ed is resting comfortably in Illinois Masonic Hospital, 836 West Wellington Avenue, Chicago, IL 60657. He is very tired and is under the effects of pain management medications. If you are considering a visit, call me and I will provide the number you need to call to check if the time you are planning to visit would be a good one. Your prayers, thoughts, emails and cards are appreciated by Ed and his family during this difficult time. Dave Lotz (912) 484-4974
|
|
Re: PFE R-40-14 UP Herald
Dick Harley
On Tue Feb 9, 2010 John Hile asked:
>>Am I correct in assuming the non-aluminum PFE R-40-14 reefers wore the UP Overland herald when new? << To which Richard Hendrickson replied, stating that he had a 12/45 photo of an R-40-14 without the "Overland" banner on the UP medallion. While I do not have a photo (in fact, I have darn few R-40-14 photos compared to R-40-10s and R-40-20s), I do have some evidence that I think is rather compelling, which leads me to believe that the R-40-14s did have the "Overland" banner on the UP medallion when they were new. First of all, the UP medallion was, of course, controlled by the Union Pacific. Their corporate website has a history of the UP Medallion. For this era, see: http://www.uprr.com/aboutup/history/uplogo/logo07.shtml This site says that the medallion without the "Overland" banner was not developed until May 1942. My collection of UP Timetables pretty much confirms that. The January 25, 1942 (revised to 2-15-42) UP public timetable still has the banner. I don't have any of the April 5, 1942 issues, but the website has a photo of one showing the "Pearl Harbor" medallion on the cover. The July 1, 1942 public timetable has the medallion without the banner. Next, the drawing for the UP medallion (to be used on refrigerator cars) without the "Overland" banner is shown in Phil Da Costa's book on page 36. It is UP drawing 303-C-3073 rev B, issued in July 1942. The revision note mentions redrawing the medallion and omitting "The Overland Route". Finally, the PFE book says that the R-40-14s (#44701 to 45700) were built by PC&F in 1941. I have copies of car cards for 44739 (built 8-11-41) and 45698 (built 12-20-41) that put the R-40-14 delivery in the second half of 1941. So, we have delivery of all the R-40-14 class at a time when UP itself was still actively using "The Overland Route" banner on its medallion. The R-40-14 class delivery was also completed before a drawing was prepared for a refrigerator car UP medallion without the banner. That leads me to believe the "Overland" banner was present on the R-40-14 class cars. Like I said at the start, I don't have a photo to confirm it, but I believe the UP medallion WITH "The Overland Route" banner was used on the PFE R-40-14 cars when new. Certainly, photos contrary to that would be new evidence that would cause me to rethink that position. Other evidence, thoughts and opinions are certainly welcome. Cheers, Dick Harley Laguna Beach, CA
|
|
MRH Newsletter Available Free
Rhbale@...
Free for your enjoyment....
The February 2010 Newsletter from Model Railroad Hobbyist eZine is now available free at _http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com._ (http://model-railroad-hobbyist.com.) Richard Bale News Editor
|
|
Re: Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity
James F. Brewer <jfbrewer@...>
Actually, regardless of what coupler you use, your track should be as smooth as possible. I am using #5, 58 and 78, and recently decided to standardize on the Kadee "scale" whisker coupler and IM semi-scale wheelsets. I have not had any problem with the couplers in operation; they will uncouple using a skewer just like the larger #5s.
Jim Brewer Glenwood MD
|
|
Re: Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity
Mark
They will have trouble on longer cars or engines over abrupt track changes. Happens very rarely and still prefer the scale couplers.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Mark Morgan
--- On Wed, 2/10/10, sseders@... <sseders@...> wrote:
From: sseders@... <sseders@...> Subject: [STMFC] Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity To: STMFC@... Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 11:00 AM I have been using Kadee scale couplers on all of my rolling stock. Currently, I do not have a layout. I have a friend (who is a very good modeler) who claims that he is having difficulty with scale couplers uncoupling where there is any height irregularity in the track. As such he as gone back to using number 5 couplers. What is anyone else experiencing? Thanks, Scott Seders [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: Standard weight
Clark
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I think all common carrier rates other than tank cars were based on weight (and commodity, and other factors -- like loose, boxed, crated, in barrels, refrigerated, etc) Tank car loads were based on gallonage AFAIK. Tim O'Connor
At 2/10/2010 09:37 AM Wednesday, you wrote:
There was a thread some years ago about "standard weight" carloads (for lack
|
|
Re: Car Builder's Dictionaries online
Pssst. MWSnap. Free download. It's Awesomeware. :-)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Tim O'Connor
At 2/10/2010 09:17 AM Wednesday, you wrote:
How about just using Adobe Acrobat? It takes care of all those needs.
|
|
Re: Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity
There are now many brands of Kadee-style couplers out there,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
including some "scale" (P:HO) sizes. I have found that it's more important than ever to have all couplers at the height prescribed by the Kadee coupler height gauge. The only coupler I'm definitely tossing is the original oversize Accumate (not the scale Accumate) which is consistently problematic with the new smaller couplers of all brands. Atlas continues to use the huge Accumates on its new RTR models! Tim O'Connor
I'm going to assume he is referring to 58's and 78's or the scale whisker couplers (number forgotten) They are smaller, (duh) so they are less tolerate of dips and humps in the track. but they operate fine on layouts as long as the height is correctly set. This often includes a 0.005 shim in the coupler box to take the droop out. We've been using #5's 58's and 78's for years on the club layout.
|
|
Re: Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity
I'm going to assume he is referring to 58's and 78's or the scale whisker couplers (number forgotten) They are smaller, (duh) so they are less tolerate of dips and humps in the track. but they operate fine on layouts as long as the height is correctly set. This often includes a 0.005 shim in the coupler box to take the droop out. We've been using #5's 58's and 78's for years on the club layout.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
brian carlson
--- On Wed, 2/10/10, sseders@... <sseders@...> wrote:
From: sseders@... <sseders@...> Subject: [STMFC] Kadee Scale Coupler Operational Reliablity To: STMFC@... Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 11:00 AM I have been using Kadee scale couplers on all of my rolling stock. Currently, I do not have a layout. I have a friend (who is a very good modeler) who claims that he is having difficulty with scale couplers uncoupling where there is any height irregularity in the track. As such he as gone back to using number 5 couplers. What is anyone else experiencing? Thanks, Scott Seders [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|