Date   

Re: Freight car Distribution...help with ICC report

Tim O'Connor
 

Larry Ostresh wrote:

FWIW there are 742,546 U.S. box, auto and ventilated cars in the
January 1945 ORER. They break down as follows:
Class XM: 614,947
This almost exactly matches Jeff's 620,000 cars for 1945.

Tony Thompson
Tony

Yes, it is about the same -- However, it begs the question of whether
various conductors' reports distinguish between XM's and XA's for the
purpose of the various ownership tallies. Especially since many XA's
were (as you have noted Tony) used for lumber or other cargos during
peacetime, and during the war (1945) we can pretty safely assume there
was relatively little automobile production!

Tim O'Connor


Re: "Tar Paper " and "Mule Hyde" Roofs

jerryglow2
 

On some brass cabooses, I stippled on artists acrylics to get a textured surface. Works well for tarred roofs on buildings too, in fact, that's how I started using the technique.

Jerry Glow

--- In STMFC@..., "wabash2813" <reporterllc@...> wrote:

Assuming that some wood freight cars and cabooses had roofs not unlike that on passenger cars, what techniques and materials are you all using to model that?

Victor Baird
Fort Wayne, Indiana


Re: Freight car Distribution

devansprr
 

--- In STMFC@..., "lnnrr" <lnnrr@...> wrote:

Folks,
Like Viv, I'm out of my league in all this. My only real acquaintance
with statistics is of the Mark Twain variety (i.e. lies). From what
I read, my view is that if I don't have and can't get the exact data
on the cars actually traveling on my chosen piece of prototype, the
G-N hypothesis gives me some level of practical guidance.
The opposite way to go might be to walk into a hobby shop and just
buy everything that seems reasonable and appealing. Thank all you
folks that care enough to think this stuff through and try to get it
all right. Even if you don't get it all perfected, it has to be
better than my random choices.
Chuck Peck

--- In STMFC@..., "Viv Brice" <viv.brice@> wrote:

Guys,
I'm getting confused - I have no experience in this area and can only
comment on what I read, with great interest I might add, on this incredibly
knowledgeable list. I might also be totally out in left field!

However, to me, we often seem to be talking about traffic and freight cars
in the same breath implying that traffic originating on road X always uses
road X freight cars. Surely traffic was loaded into whatever MTY freight
cars were available, which may or may not be home road, may or may not be
cars being headed 'home' or even may be any car which just happens to be in
the yard and fits the requirement.

As I read it, the G-N 'method/concept/whatever we call it' is not concerned
with traffic, but only with freight cars. Thus Mike's large number of SP
freight cars would probably not represent all of the SP originated traffic,
which would also be being carried in other cars headed east, say PRR, NYC,
etc. Indeed, there is no reason to assume that all of the SP cars contain SP
originated freight (although this may be stretching things a bit - I bow
here to other with more knowledge of the area's traffic flow than I have).

My point is that, from what I've read on this list, traffic and the cars
included in G-N are not necessarily synonymous and we need to be very
careful about assuming that something that affects traffic automatically has
the same effect on freight car distribution.

Regards, Viv Brice
An SPF from 'Down Under'
Chuck and Viv,

The statistical "variability" of "traffic" you are hinting at was discussed on this group back in February 2009.

I crafted a post based on a simple statistical analysis, not to prove or disprove the basis for a specific road appearing at a specific time and location, but simply to illustrate the probability of certain reporting marks appearing in a sample set. (devansprr Wed Feb 4, 2009 4:18 pm ((PST)))

My focus is WWII, and I had been reviewing the Delano color photos to get a sense of freight car weathering. A picture from Belan, NM caught my eye since it had just four box cars in it - all eastern roads. One B&O (no surprise - big fleet), one Wabash (not that surprising), one Erie (getting a little rarer), and one C&WC 40' Steel Automobile car (C&WC's TOTAL X and XM fleet was 532 cars - this is kind of like the mason jar car that caused so much discussion on this group a year or two ago). The national X/XM fleet was over 800,00 cars in 1943, so we are talking one out of every 1,600 cars. Now that C&WC reporting mark, in New Mexico, was a LONG shot.

This triggered two thoughts - most railfans probably recall the odd, rare car much more clearly than recalling the predominance of plain jane cars from the majors of the day (during WWII, eleven roads owned half the nation's box car fleet. Watch trains for a few hours at a busy spot, and people of the era might forget the fact that 9% or so of the cars were PRR - see them everyday). But a C&WC car? Where is that railroad? I have never seen that before. Not to be forgotten quickly (and more likely photographed too - which opens another can of worms.)

Thought two - for general merchandise box cars, not in captive service, on mainlines that are primarily bridge traffic, some simple statistics are probably a valid analysis tool to suggest trends. For example, if my planned mainline model railroad has a number of freight trains that come out of staging every operating session, with a total of 200 box cars arriving on layout, then I doubt my C&WC model should make an appearance every op session (I might be able to justify having the C&WC car pass through once each session if I had 1600 box cars arrive on layout every session - not likely ;-) If it did appear every session among just 200 box cars, and my model railfan was counting cars (or we are counting his old home movies ;-), then one would think that C&WC was a major road, since it would appear more often than a boxcar from T&P, Cotton Belt, D&H, WM and WP since each of those well known roads had less than 0.5% of the national box car fleet (less than 1 in 200 boxcars nationally for each of these roads).

In the end analysis, statistics suggests that modelers are quite justified in including a considerable "fiddle" fleet in their staging area so that some sense of randomness can be added to the trains that appear on their layouts out of staging. In fact, the huge number of small roads during the WWII era might actually make a fiddle yard in staging a mandatory feature if one wants to model the variability of freight car reporting marks that should appear on a layout.

For example, if your fleet of cars generates 200 boxcar moves (traffic) onto a layout every session, and you want to provide a prototypical sense of randomness over 5 operating sessions before an unusually rare car makes a second appearance, then you would draw those 200 box cars from a fleet of at least 236 cars. At least 25 of those cars would each be from a different, small fleet RR, and appear only once out of the five sessions. This is because roads such as Rutland, Clinchfield, Georgia, SP&S, DM&IR, TH&B each had X/XM fleets LESS than 0.1% of the national fleet. Each session, only five of those "rare" 25 cars would appear on the layout. So over five sessions, that Rutland box car should only arrive on the layout ONCE.

To further increase the sense of "randomness", out of the 200 box cars arriving "on-scene" each session, 178 would be regulars on the layout, representing the 39 roads that during WWII each had at least 0.5% of the national X/XM fleet (at least 1 in 200 cars - Katy was the smallest fleet that just makes this cut). So those 178 cars would appear every session. From the rare "fiddle" fleet described above, five other boxcars from the smallest 147 RR X/XM fleets would also appear each session.

But that leaves 17 other boxcars to deploy each session (200-178-5), and to maintain the sense of randomness, those 17 cars would need to come from a fleet of at least 33 cars, one each representing the 33 roads that did not make the "big fleet" cut of 0.5% (39 roads), but that were bigger than the 147 roads/owners that are in the rare "fiddle" fleet. Each session, 17 cars from this intermediate fiddle fleet of 33 roads would be selected. Note that railroads in this fleet include T&P, Cotton Belt, D&H, WM, KCS & WP. Out of the five operating sessions, some cars in this intermediate fleet may appear three or four times, others just once or twice.

So now our model railfan captures on his model movie camera five rare X/XM's out of 200 that passed his favorite train watching spot that day. But how many will notice that, averaged over time, and assuming N-G is in effect at this location, 100 of the 200 X/XM's that are captured by his camera on that day will be from the 11 roads that owned 50% of the nation's WWII box car fleet? (Boring...)

Note that all of this is just to "normalize" the reporting marks. Additional "fiddle" cars would be required for "unusual" and rare cars that were a clear spotting feature. For example, the GN plywood war emergency box cars were unusual and standouts to some extent, and while GN would have several cars appear every session, statistically speaking the GN car was almost as rare as the C&WC car. So it might warrant a place in the "fiddle" fleet instead of the every-session 178 car fleet. One could obviously extend this concept to an absurd extent, and that is clearly not necessary.

But I think it might be a worthy objective, on a model railroad, that the rare prototype cars remain rare, and that a WWII train full of one-offs would never occur, and that instead a train with a significant percentage of 1937 ARA standard box cars (about 1 in 7 of the nation's X/XM fleet in WWII) should be present, as should one or two PPR X29's (that class alone was nearly 3% of the national fleet).

To highlight this point, during WWII, fully 40% of the nation's steel, 40 foot, non-PRR box car fleet was the 1937 ARA design! Fortunately for me Branchline, Red Caboose, and Intermountain have a wide selection for that fleet - many with WWII paint schemes.

Sooo, feel free to visit the hobby shop, and as long as you (1) restrict your purchases to cars accurate for the era you model, and (2) you model a location with significant through/bridge traffic (or else all of this ENTIRE thread goes out the window, as Elden has clearly demonstrated during previous discussions), and (3) include a fleet of about 40 or so fiddle cars in your staging yard so "rare" cars are "rare" on your layout, and (4) your visiting "consist" police have a memory that only lasts about five op sessions, THEN, no one can question the stray appearance of that C&WC box car, or that yellow one with the Mason Jar on it - once every five sessions.

Dave Evans

PS - looking at my Feb 2009 post on recommended fiddle fleets, it was a little confusing - if I have time this weekend I may clean it up and re-post so it is more understandable.


Re: Lumber Loading

Tim O'Connor
 

Clark I don't understand -- what does ALBERT LEA BACK HAUL mean?

Lumber definitely could be diverted before it reached its final
destination. And diversions could go in any direction, as long as
someone paid for it (the diversion, that is).

Tim O'Connor

NP 26619 LUMBER 119 ALBERT LEA BACK HAUL

The car listed above was in an M&StL Minneapolis to Peoria time freight. This car must be ping-ponging across the railroad waiting for a buyer?
Clark Propst


Re: Lumber Loading

Tim O'Connor
 

Jeff

First of all, you have a small sample. It's 2400 cars, but it's also
only from a small number of trains on any given day, over 90 days.

Second, it's possible that in late fall-winter months less lumber was
shipped. Since shippers may prefer box cars, the seasonal slow down may
have meant there were enough box cars to cover the traffic. Even though
fall is big for grain, double door cars were not suitable for grain --
but that's what the lumber shippers liked.

SP added 1,500 50' double door box cars in 1950-1951 (A-50-17). They
didn't buy any more until 1955. But then they also added more than
2,000 53'6" 70 ton flat cars in 1949-1950, and nearly a thousand more
in 1953-1954. So I'm thinking it's a combination of small data sample,
and slow season for lumber.

Tim O'Connor

I'm stumped. Why would there be no lumber on flat cars in Oct-Dec of 1951? Was this the time period after the Streamliner accident (a piece of lumber shifted on a flat car, and broke the windows of a passing Streamliner, showering the passengers with broken glass) ??
Regards,
-Jeff


Re: G-N versus Consist Data for train construction

al_brown03
 

I like someone's suggestion of reserving a small proportion of the fleet for rarities, which are rotated. Saves me the need for 974 X29s: I don't mind building a few, but hundreds of the same thing are a pleasure only for our distinguished SPF brethren (and maybe even only some of them!). :-)

Al Brown, Melbourne, Fla.

--- In STMFC@..., "Mike Brock" <brockm@...> wrote:

Allen Rueter writes:

", and national pool rare cars(<1%)."

And Tony Thompson follows with:

"But I take your point, that we DO need rarities so that our
trains will exhibit those rarities."

Yes...my "small number" factor in order to achieve the FEC car. Besides,
when I was a kid I saw KO&G trains...they had 9 box cars. Let's see. If I
conduct an op session once per day, the Cubs will win their second World
Series before I can use it. Meantime...

Allen adds:

"now you know why there is never enough staging space."

Staging hell. Storage space for the 4750 box cars...seems like that many
anyhow.

Mike Brock


Re: Freight car Distribution

Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
 

&#92;Ross McLeod wrote:
Whose first rule?
Railroads look to saving every cent they can.
Yep. That's why truckers have been eating their lunch on the profitable traffic for decades. Sorry for implying that a railroader might want to serve the customer.

Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history


Re: was LCL - Stop Off traffic

Ross McLeod <cdnrailmarine@...>
 

"Stop off cars also handled thing like appliances, farm machinery, etc".
 
Correct, I believe with ag imps you could have up to three stop offs, baler twine as many as you wished. 
 
There was also stop offs to complete loading as well there were many transit arrangements such as treating in transit (poles etc), milling in transit (grain), storage in transit or one of my favourites furfural residue (corn cob hulls ex Memphis made into glue @ Oroville for wood built-up (plywood)).  
 
Ross McLeod Calgary 
 
 
 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


"Tar Paper " and "Mule Hyde" Roofs

reporterllc
 

Assuming that some wood freight cars and cabooses had roofs not unlike that on passenger cars, what techniques and materials are you all using to model that?

Victor Baird
Fort Wayne, Indiana


Re: Box/auto distribution 1938

Tim O'Connor
 

Larry, does 2,267 box cars on the UP mainline even represent the
traffic of a single typical day? So here we are looking at freight
trains spread over four months... or on any given day, less than
1% of the box cars on the main line are sampled.

What can be learned from this? Nothing, I believe.

Look at it another way -- suppose you had conductors books for the
same time period from three other conductors. Do you think that the
tallies would be the same? I don't -- not one chance in a thousand.
So then, which would be the representative sample? Answer: neither.

If you had ALL of the conductors books for every day for a full
week, now that would be interesting! That would smooth out a lot
of the daily fluctuations. Of course there's seasonal variations,
but that might actually be easy to discern in a large sample.

Tim O'Connor

Here is some info on the distribution of box and auto cars for trains on the U.P. mainline between Laramie and Rawlins in 1938. The data are compiled from three Freight Conductors' Train Books written by conductors Ferguson, Fraley, and Fitz. Ferguson's data are from May and June of 1938, while Fraley's and Fitz's are from September-October of the same year.

In the tables below the information from the train books is compared to national averages based on the January, 1938 ORER. The national values count only box, auto and ventilated cars in interchange service on Class I U.S. roads or their lessees.

The tables show the road initial, the number of box/auto cars in the conductors' books, the percentage these cars represent, and the national percentage. Only roads with 5 or more cars reported in the train books are listed.

Roads in which the percentage of cars tallied from the conductors' books exceeds the national percentage.
Road: Num; Book %; Nat %
SP: 201; 15.1%; 3.3%
CB&Q: 125; 9.4%; 3.0%
NYC: 99; 7.4%; 6.1%
MILW: 83; 6.2%; 4.7%
CNW: 64; 4.8%; 3.2%
WP: 54; 4.1%; 0.4%
GTW: 53; 4.0%; 1.3%
RI: 44; 3.3%; 3.1%
MP: 33; 2.5%; 2.3%
IC: 32; 2.4%; 2.3%
SLSF: 31; 2.3%; 2.0%
PM: 26; 2.0%; 1.5%
DT&I: 21; 1.6%; 0.3%
NKP: 15; 1.1%; 1.0%
T&P: 15; 1.1%; 0.5%
T&NO: 14; 1.1%; 1.0%
CGW: 8; 0.6%; 0.5%
CMO: 7; 0.5%; 0.5%
B&LE: 5; 0.4%; 0.0%

Roads in which the percentage of cars tallied from the conductors' books is less than the national percentage.
Road: Num; Book %; Nat %
PRR: 79; 5.9%; 10.4%
ATSF: 36; 2.7%; 4.9%
MC: 27; 2.0%; 2.5%
B&O: 24; 1.8%; 4.4%
NP: 24; 1.8%; 3.1%
SOUTHERN: 19; 1.4%; 3.6%
WABASH: 18; 1.4%; 1.6%
GN: 15; 1.1%; 3.5%
SOO: 15; 1.1%; 1.4%
ERIE: 13; 1.0%; 1.4%
L&N: 11; 0.8%; 2.2%
C&O: 9; 0.7%; 1.4%
CCC&STL: 7; 0.5%; 1.5%
N&W: 7; 0.5%; 1.0%
D&RGW: 6; 0.5%; 0.6%
M-K-T: 6; 0.5%; 0.6%
DL&W: 5; 0.4%; 1.3%

FWIW the percentage of box/auto cars that were UP is 41% - 935 cars of a total of 2,267. (1,332 cars were used to calculate the Book % in the tables.)

Best wishes,
Larry Ostresh
Laramie, Wyoming


Re: Freight car Distribution

Ross McLeod <cdnrailmarine@...>
 

"Sure, Ross, but the FIRST RULE is to "Protect the shipment." You
could not care less about car hire if a shipper needs that empty car.
Now of course you don't keep empties sitting around idle, and they
would certainly be moved homeward (or via reverse route) if not needed."


Whose first rule?
 
Railroads look to saving every cent they can.
 
Not all shipments are equal, there are lots that can wait until tomorrow when you have your own cars available.
 
Shipments are rated by profitability therefore the shipments that are seen to give the best rate of return will get cars today, the also rans get cars when available.
 
Of course this is a simplification but so is to say that any available car will be used.  
 
I would naive to say politics, neighbouring industries etc don't enter into the equation.
 
Ross McLeod Calgary 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Freight car Distribution

Mike Brock <brockm@...>
 

Chuck Peck says:

The opposite way to go might be to walk into a hobby shop and just
buy everything that seems reasonable and appealing.
Well...maybe in years past. Now days one doesn't usually have as much choice. Hoever, the point is well taken. Just be sure you don't go too strongly in favor of a particular RR with the exception of the home road and Pennsy and NYC. Oh...don't forget Brock's Fifth Rule of frt cars. You'll need a few NP box cars.

There is little doubt that at least one of every class of box car went over Sherman Hill at one time. I assume that the same can be said for Santa Fe through Flagstaff. OTOH, in addition to one of every class of car, good ol' General Tojo apparently also traveled on either UP or Santa Fe to CA in the late 30's. I am not certain that the same can be said for the Rutland....[ Not Tojo. I mean...why? ], but Armand Premo's list of cars for the Rutland [ wherever that is ] doesn't seem to match the G-N. IOW, Chuck might be better off modeling a trunk line if he intends to simply roll the dice.

Mike Brock


Re: G-N versus Consist Data for train construction

Mike Brock <brockm@...>
 

Allen Rueter writes:

", and national pool rare cars(<1%)."

And Tony Thompson follows with:

"But I take your point, that we DO need rarities so that our
trains will exhibit those rarities."

Yes...my "small number" factor in order to achieve the FEC car. Besides, when I was a kid I saw KO&G trains...they had 9 box cars. Let's see. If I conduct an op session once per day, the Cubs will win their second World Series before I can use it. Meantime...

Allen adds:

"now you know why there is never enough staging space."

Staging hell. Storage space for the 4750 box cars...seems like that many anyhow.

Mike Brock


Re: G-N versus Consist Data for train construction

Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
 

Allen Rueter wrote:
It seems to me you might want four pools of cars . . . and you would want at least one standard deviation, if not two, extra cars in these pools to create variety .
Not a bad idea, Allen, but given the sort of data we have I would be entertained to see a calculation of the Standard deviation . . .
But I take your point, that we DO need rarities so that our trains will exhibit those rarities.

Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history


Re: was LCL - Stop Off traffic

Steve SANDIFER
 

Stop off cars also handled thing like appliances, farm machinery, etc.
______________
J. Stephen (Steve) Sandifer
mailto:steve.sandifer@...
Home: 12027 Mulholland Drive, Meadows Place, TX 77477, 281-568-9918
Office: Southwest Central Church of Christ, 4011 W. Bellfort, Houston, TX 77025, 713-667-9417

----- Original Message -----
From: Ross McLeod
To: STMFC@...
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:02 PM
Subject: RE: [STMFC] was LCL - Stop Off traffic




"The railroad term would "stop off to partially unload". Freight rate would
be for the entire weight of the commodity from origin to final destination,
with a stop off charge for each stop off point."


Plus out of line haul charges, if applicable.

Out of line would be the extra distance the car would have to travel to the stop off point versus being shipped direct to the destination.

Some railroads would waive OLH charges if the out of route mileage did not exceed 1/3 of their haul.

I understood it was the high cost of cedar lumber that fueled the demand for partial loads.

Ross McLeod Calgary.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


Re: G-N versus Consist Data for train construction

Allen Rueter
 

It seems to me you might want four pools of cars. home road pool, favored/connecting interchange pool, National pool common cars , and national pool rare cars(<1%). you would want at least one standard deviation, if not two, extra cars in these pools to create
variety .


now you know why there is never enough staging space.
--
Allen Rueter
StLouis MO


Re: Freight car Distribution

Greg Martin
 

In the past five year I have heard this kind of thinking only once when
cars were so short you prayed for an empty and it went like this, " sure the
government says we have to give you a car, but they never said when..."
Now that is about as stupid as it gets as in the short three years later the
railroads and TTX are storing cars on every short line that is willing to
take them at $25.00 a day... OUCH!

So I think the message here is a bit out of the realm of the real
transportation world. Not having a car because of a shortage in the harvest season
is a local agents nightmare, as Tony will attest to, but that is why they
were there and paid well. All shipments were equally as important to him
because his bonus depended on it.

There were foreign road agents in every area of the country at the time
hoping to get that load/loads of perishables to his receiver. As an example
that I once described to Bill Welch if your GN packing house in Minneapolis
MN wanted those winter Navels at the HEAD END of the harvest rush the local
WFE agent might have to work with an SP or ATSF agent in Bakersfield and be
willing to give up some WFE cars to the origin carrier to secure the
needed business. He might have to scour the Bakersfield yards to look for
empties or dispatch cars from eastern Washington to get the cars required if the
origin carrier was short of cars to cover the business. He, the WFE rep.,
would likely have to move the cars car hire free to do so. This was a car
accounting nightmare as it required a "reclaim" to cover the letter quote
but nonetheless it was done. This was a marketing decision not an operation
department decision. But it also meant a better relationship for the shipper
who had a chance for added revenue (read as a better price for the lading)
and a "whose your buddy" for the local SP or ATSF agent. It was how
business was done and still is.

Greg Martin

In a message dated 4/14/2010 8:44:09 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
cdnrailmarine@... writes:

Whose first rule?

Railroads look to saving every cent they can.

Not all shipments are equal, there are lots that can wait until tomorrow
when you have your own cars available.

Shipments are rated by profitability therefore the shipments that are seen
to give the best rate of return will get cars today, the also rans get
cars when available.

Of course this is a simplification but so is to say that any available car
will be used.

I would naive to say politics, neighbouring industries etc don't enter
into the equation.

Ross McLeod Calgary


Re: Freight car Distribution

lnnrr <lnnrr@...>
 

Folks,
Like Viv, I'm out of my league in all this. My only real acquaintance
with statistics is of the Mark Twain variety (i.e. lies). From what
I read, my view is that if I don't have and can't get the exact data
on the cars actually traveling on my chosen piece of prototype, the
G-N hypothesis gives me some level of practical guidance.
The opposite way to go might be to walk into a hobby shop and just
buy everything that seems reasonable and appealing. Thank all you
folks that care enough to think this stuff through and try to get it
all right. Even if you don't get it all perfected, it has to be
better than my random choices.
Chuck Peck

--- In STMFC@..., "Viv Brice" <viv.brice@...> wrote:

Guys,
I'm getting confused - I have no experience in this area and can only
comment on what I read, with great interest I might add, on this incredibly
knowledgeable list. I might also be totally out in left field!

However, to me, we often seem to be talking about traffic and freight cars
in the same breath implying that traffic originating on road X always uses
road X freight cars. Surely traffic was loaded into whatever MTY freight
cars were available, which may or may not be home road, may or may not be
cars being headed 'home' or even may be any car which just happens to be in
the yard and fits the requirement.

As I read it, the G-N 'method/concept/whatever we call it' is not concerned
with traffic, but only with freight cars. Thus Mike's large number of SP
freight cars would probably not represent all of the SP originated traffic,
which would also be being carried in other cars headed east, say PRR, NYC,
etc. Indeed, there is no reason to assume that all of the SP cars contain SP
originated freight (although this may be stretching things a bit - I bow
here to other with more knowledge of the area's traffic flow than I have).

My point is that, from what I've read on this list, traffic and the cars
included in G-N are not necessarily synonymous and we need to be very
careful about assuming that something that affects traffic automatically has
the same effect on freight car distribution.

Regards, Viv Brice
An SPF from 'Down Under'





Re: Freight car Distribution

Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
 

Ross McLeod wrote:
What about car hire?
Not sure you would use any available car if your car hire account is out of balance.
Those foreign cars on your railroad are costing you money by the hour and by the mile, they should be rushed to the interchange before midnight if your car hire is out of balance.
Sure, Ross, but the FIRST RULE is to "Protect the shipment." You could not care less about car hire if a shipper needs that empty car. Now of course you don't keep empties sitting around idle, and they would certainly be moved homeward (or via reverse route) if not needed.

Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@...
Publishers of books on railroad history


Re: Freight car Distribution

Ross McLeod <cdnrailmarine@...>
 

"Exactly right, VIv, and that's in fact the entire basis of why
the G-N idea can be true: you used what you had if you were short of
cars, REGARDLESS of the AAR rules, and that available empty could be
almost anything."
 
What about car hire?
 
Not sure you would use any available car if your car hire account is out of balance.
 
Those foreign cars on your railroad are costing you money by the hour and by the mile,  they should be rushed to the interchange before midnight if your car hire is out of balance. 
 
Ross McLeod Calgary 

 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

105801 - 105820 of 195509