Date   

Re: Red Caboose X29

Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
 

Lawrence Rast wrote:
Speedwitch's decals for the X29 are VERY nice. Unfortunately, Ted has been
going through some "stuff." (See this link:
http://speedwitch.com/update.htm) As such, the decals may be difficult to
come by for the time being.

However, the website still shows there here:
http://speedwitch.com/Decals/d116.htm. I'd contact Ted before ordering.
The "update" is from last November. Ted had a good supply of most of his decals at Cocoa Beach in January and did not give any indication that they are going out of stock.

Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com
Publishers of books on railroad history


Re: Red Caboose X29

Lawrence Rast
 

Speedwitch's decals for the X29 are VERY nice. Unfortunately, Ted has been
going through some "stuff." (See this link:
http://speedwitch.com/update.htm) As such, the decals may be difficult to
come by for the time being.

However, the website still shows there here:
http://speedwitch.com/Decals/d116.htm. I'd contact Ted before ordering.

<http://speedwitch.com/update.htm>Best,
Lawrence Rast

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Brian Carlson <prrk41361@yahoo.com> wrote:



Ted's Speedwitch set is very good.

Brian Carlson

--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Aley, Jeff A <Jeff.A.Aley@intel.com> wrote:

From: Aley, Jeff A <Jeff.A.Aley@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [STMFC] Red Caboose X29

To: "STMFC@yahoogroups.com" <STMFC@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 5:03 PM




Bruce (et. al.),

Please remind me: from whom should I buy HO decals for a patch-panelled
X29? I would like to represent cars as they appeared in 1952.

Thanks,

-Jeff





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Backdating "Shake and Take" reefers

Pieter Roos
 

If your period is before 1936 or so, some or all should have double board roofs (wood plank) instead of the Hutchins metal roof. Any time pre-WWII would have at some of the cars with a wood roof. At least, that is what I recall from Bill Welch's articles!

The first volume of the Speedwitch Journal "Railroad Prototype Modeling" had Bill's article on making an earlier BREX car from the Accurail model, which covered some of the roof changes (although the BREX car had a Murphy XLa roof, not what you need on the FGEX car). There is a drawing of the as-built car in Train Shed Cyclopedia #3, Box, Stock and Refrigerator Cars from the 1931 Car Builders Cyc.

Pieter Roos

--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Dean" <1payne1@...> wrote:

I've been reading the "Shake and Take" reefer article in the latest RMC, and really like the idea. However, I believe the Kahn's car paint scheme is to new for my late 30's time frame.
I'd like to model one of the other cars featured in the article. IIRC from Bill Welch's clinic, the FGEX cars were more common than the NX cars. Besides, the aluminum roof paint on the NX car seems like a post-WWII thing to me (cringing, as this is a guess on my part. Were they painted BCR in their first decades?)
If I should consider attempting one of these bashes, does anybody have advice on backdating, besides K brakes? (AB brakes were new in the early 30's, and not likely to have been retrofitted to these cars in the mid-late 30's.) Were the trucks originally arch bar or T-section?
I may have to dig out my copy of Bill Welch's clinic handout... :-)
Also, not having access to a NWSL Riveter, would Archer rivets work in this application? I'll be ordering some for another project.

Dean Payne


Re: Backdating "Shake and Take" reefers

Dean Payne
 

--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "Bruce Smith" <smithbf@...> wrote:

"Dean" <1payne1@...> 02/22/11 6:02 PM >>>
I've been reading the "Shake and Take" reefer article in the latest
RMC, and really like the idea. However, I believe the >Kahn's car paint
scheme is to new for my late 30's time frame.
I'd like to model one of the other cars featured in the article. IIRC
from Bill Welch's clinic, the FGEX cars were more >common than the NX
cars. Besides, the aluminum roof paint on the NX car seems like a
post-WWII thing to me >(cringing, as this is a guess on my part. Were
they painted BCR in their first decades?)

Dean,

So, as Mont sort of indicated, the "Kahn's car" is in reality an FGE
1922 design reefer. Subsequently, some of those cars were transferred
to NX and some of those leased to Kahn's. For your period, you want to
an FGE car for sure. The paint scheme of the time is well documented
and included an oxide red roof and ends. BTW, this car is available in
a reasonably accurate resin kit from Sunshine (1 foot too short, but
otherwise excellent).

If I should consider attempting one of these bashes, does anybody have
advice on backdating, besides K brakes? (AB >brakes were new in the
early 30's, and not likely to have been retrofitted to these cars in the
mid-late 30's.) Were the >trucks originally arch bar or T-section?
I may have to dig out my copy of Bill Welch's clinic handout... :-)
Also, not having access to a NWSL Riveter, would Archer rivets work in
this application? I'll be ordering some for another >project.

You may need to add a few rivets but do not add the "plates" on the
sides. These are really the ends of the steel that was used for framing
post WWII. Archer will work fine for these.

For the K-brakes, use the linkages as shown (since ABs were retrofitted)
with a KC cylinder.

I've done a few of these as well (the 1953 Kahn's and 1944 era NX and
FGE cars). For details, you can check out the FGE project on PRRPro. I
hope to write mine up for TKM. Some differences from Mont's models
include:
- IM FGE ladders - why use anything else when IM now offers these <G>?
- IM FGE hatch rests - these are on the sprues with the ladders, so I
removed the molded on hatch rests and added these. You will see in the
photos that these are noticable on these reefers.
- all brass wire underbody piping
- and of course, I used correct paint and lettering for 1944.

Regards
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL

I've found my handout from Bill's clinic, I'll add some things I've learned from it:
The truss rod underframe "...FGEX and WFEX cars would have received cast side frame trucks prior by 1940." (sic)
The fishbelly underframe FGEX cars "...initially rode on Andrews trucks. It is unknown if they kept these trucks."

Well, none of those are the cars we are talking about! However, no truck info is given for those with built-up underframes as used in the kitbash. I expect the information is simply not available, I can't fault Bill for that. All the photos I've seen show normal cast steel trucks, but I don't know the dates they were taken.

Talking about the cars with the built-up riveted underframes "...would have the same improvements applied to them as early as 1938... Hutchins roofs and AB brake systems." So, I was incorrect that AB brakes wouldn't be seen on these in the late 30's, but I think it would be the exception, not the norm.

Dean Payne


Re: Red Caboose X29

Bruce Smith
 

Max,

As I said, the kits are listed as in stock. Email, using the address
given at RC to order.

Regards
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL

"Kathe Robin" <kathe@cheatriver.com> 02/22/11 4:56 PM >>>
Not that I could find on their web pages. LHS in some area may have
them.

Max

-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Aley, Jeff A
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:57 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [STMFC] Red Caboose X29

Max,

Are they not available from Red Caboose?

Regards,

-Jeff


From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
cheat_river_engineering
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:53 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [STMFC] Re: conductor's reefer data



Does anyone haveither a kit on an unpainted assembled model of the Red
Caboose "original" version of an X-29 boxcar they would be willing to
sell
ortrade for? I'm in the market for at least 3 such cars.

Thanks,

Nax
=======================================================================email
: m_robin@cheatriver.com<mailto:m_robin%40cheatriver.com>

smail: Max S. Robin, PE
Cheat River Engineering Inc.
P. O. Box 289
23 Richwood Place
Denville, NJ 07834

voice: 973-945-5007(9:00am-11:00pm M-F,11:00am-11:00pm WE, Eastern)
=======================================================================







------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links






------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Tank cars

Bruce Smith
 

"milepost1" <bushnell.mp77@gmail.com> 02/22/11 8:11 PM >>>
http://www.youtube.com/user/jlebaron1#p/u/1/CHcPxuwQHaY
I was most interested in the tank cars on this "short" freight. Of
special interest was the three dome tank with different >size domes on
the same car.

I'm hardly an expert but can someone "educate" me about these cars- I
don't remember seeing a "model" that replicates >this. Also if you watch
the video there is one "small" single dome car too. Any guess as to
size, type, build date, etc. etc. >etc.

Gordon,

Tank cars with a larger center dome and smaller side domes are usually
cars that were single compartment tanks retrofitted to be
multicompartment tanks. There also appears to be a 3 dome tank with
equal sized domes. The only single dome car I see is a TEXACO car right
behind the tender. The video is difficult to see much detail on, but
the retrofitted car might be of GATC manufacture

Regards
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL


Re: Waybills

Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
 

----- Original Message -----
From: mike brock

No one responding in this thread has mentioned a frt conductor's book. . . .

----- Original Message -----


What was the real RR purpose of the conductor's book?

KL


Re: Waybills

mike brock <brockm@...>
 

Jeff Aley writes:

"It depends upon how you operate your model RR. If you allow freight agents to "confiscate" empty cars as they pass through the yard, then the cars in your through trains will need waybills and Empty Car bills to designate which are available for confiscation.

On the other hand, if there is no such operation on your model rr, then waybills are not needed for through freights."

No one responding in this thread has mentioned a frt conductor's book. Now...given that there is much paper work and RR functions that we don't mercifully have to perform...like checking for hot boxes, checking on tie life, replacing individual ties, supplying paper to the agent, replacing flues, placing sand in sand bunkers, straightening track after a 4-12-2 rolls by, etc....I find that the info in a frt conductor's book supplies all I need with regard to frt car movement on my Sherman Hill layout with its minimum number of industries...not unlike most mountain RR activity. For example, a frt conductor's book identifies each frt car in a train, the train its in, the car's contents, where it came from and where it's going. In the case of, say, train X4004 headed east from Rawlins to Laramie, the list of cars will usually include a large number going east to other locations. The yardmaster will remove those going through Denver and will be careful not to exceed the locomotive's tonnage rating for the grade over the Hill. A new list would then be generated for the train before it left Laramnie eastbound. Now, of course, I could supply a tiny hammer for the yard crew to nail a destination card [ I have a video showing this process ] to each car but when I have done that in the past, the operators lose the %&^%$# hammers AND no one can read the &(&^+$ cars on the car anyhow.

To help the crew of, say, X9003, a train order will specify that cars are to be dropped at Brucef...ooops...Buford. The conductor will tell the head end crew what cars are to be dropped...and the agent at Buford will tell them where....with luck.
Mike Brock


Re: Backdating "Shake and Take" reefers

Bruce Smith
 

"Dean" <1payne1@windstream.net> 02/22/11 6:02 PM >>>
I've been reading the "Shake and Take" reefer article in the latest
RMC, and really like the idea. However, I believe the >Kahn's car paint
scheme is to new for my late 30's time frame.
I'd like to model one of the other cars featured in the article. IIRC
from Bill Welch's clinic, the FGEX cars were more >common than the NX
cars. Besides, the aluminum roof paint on the NX car seems like a
post-WWII thing to me >(cringing, as this is a guess on my part. Were
they painted BCR in their first decades?)

Dean,

So, as Mont sort of indicated, the "Kahn's car" is in reality an FGE
1922 design reefer. Subsequently, some of those cars were transferred
to NX and some of those leased to Kahn's. For your period, you want to
an FGE car for sure. The paint scheme of the time is well documented
and included an oxide red roof and ends. BTW, this car is available in
a reasonably accurate resin kit from Sunshine (1 foot too short, but
otherwise excellent).

If I should consider attempting one of these bashes, does anybody have
advice on backdating, besides K brakes? (AB >brakes were new in the
early 30's, and not likely to have been retrofitted to these cars in the
mid-late 30's.) Were the >trucks originally arch bar or T-section?
I may have to dig out my copy of Bill Welch's clinic handout... :-)
Also, not having access to a NWSL Riveter, would Archer rivets work in
this application? I'll be ordering some for another >project.

You may need to add a few rivets but do not add the "plates" on the
sides. These are really the ends of the steel that was used for framing
post WWII. Archer will work fine for these.

For the K-brakes, use the linkages as shown (since ABs were retrofitted)
with a KC cylinder.

I've done a few of these as well (the 1953 Kahn's and 1944 era NX and
FGE cars). For details, you can check out the FGE project on PRRPro. I
hope to write mine up for TKM. Some differences from Mont's models
include:
- IM FGE ladders - why use anything else when IM now offers these <G>?
- IM FGE hatch rests - these are on the sprues with the ladders, so I
removed the molded on hatch rests and added these. You will see in the
photos that these are noticable on these reefers.
- all brass wire underbody piping
- and of course, I used correct paint and lettering for 1944.

Regards
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL


Tank cars

Bushnell.mp77 Account
 

I recently watched an old film (youtube) that was of a 1947 passenger train but before that a few quick glimpses of a freight appeared.

http://www.youtube.com/user/jlebaron1#p/u/1/CHcPxuwQHaY

I was most interested in the tank cars on this "short" freight. Of special interest was the three dome tank with different size domes on the same car.

I'm hardly an expert but can someone "educate" me about these cars- I don't remember seeing a "model" that replicates this. Also if you watch the video there is one "small" single dome car too. Any guess as to size, type, build date, etc. etc. etc.

Gordon Andrews




--
The human brain is like a railroad freight car -- guaranteed to have a certain capacity but often running empty."


Re: Waybills

Aley, Jeff A
 

Armand,

It depends upon how you operate your model RR. If you allow freight agents to "confiscate" empty cars as they pass through the yard, then the cars in your through trains will need waybills and Empty Car bills to designate which are available for confiscation.

On the other hand, if there is no such operation on your model rr, then waybills are not needed for through freights.

Regards,

-Jeff


From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of A. Premo
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:30 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: Waybills



Question:Would waybills be as important (in the model world) for through freights as to way freights?Armand Premo
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim O'Connor
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 8:43 PM
Subject: [STMFC] Re: Waybills

Tony

Might be the same raw data, for sure. I don't know, there's only
so much time in the world for most of us. Railroads created paperwork
because they were a business. Paperwork is not my hobby interest. I'm
a minimalist myself -- a waybill only needs to say where the car is
going as far as I'm concerned. :-) Your waybill analysis pays real
dividends because it informs your modeling. But for the life of me
I can't see the utility of knowing that company ABC in East Podunk
bought fresh carrots and company XYZ in West Podunk only bought
oranges -- unless of course, I am modeling the Podunk Terminal Rwy.

Tim O'Connor

--------------------------------------------------

You may want to look at this group -- they have compiled
spreadsheets of real railroad freight shippers. Can you say
"information overload"?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ry-ops-industrialSIG/
Don't know if it's the same database, but the OpSIG (operations)
group also has a huge listing of shippers on line, at opsig.org

Tony Thompson
----------------------------------------------------------

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2804 - Release Date: 04/11/10 06:32:00

__________________________________________________________
Get Free Email with Video Mail & Video Chat!
http://www.netzero.net/freeemail?refcd=NZTAGOUT1FREM0210


Backdating "Shake and Take" reefers

Dean Payne
 

I've been reading the "Shake and Take" reefer article in the latest RMC, and really like the idea. However, I believe the Kahn's car paint scheme is to new for my late 30's time frame.
I'd like to model one of the other cars featured in the article. IIRC from Bill Welch's clinic, the FGEX cars were more common than the NX cars. Besides, the aluminum roof paint on the NX car seems like a post-WWII thing to me (cringing, as this is a guess on my part. Were they painted BCR in their first decades?)
If I should consider attempting one of these bashes, does anybody have advice on backdating, besides K brakes? (AB brakes were new in the early 30's, and not likely to have been retrofitted to these cars in the mid-late 30's.) Were the trucks originally arch bar or T-section?
I may have to dig out my copy of Bill Welch's clinic handout... :-)
Also, not having access to a NWSL Riveter, would Archer rivets work in this application? I'll be ordering some for another project.

Dean Payne


Re: CG 7115 PS-1

John Hile
 

--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "john66h" <john66h@...> wrote:

Hello All,

In researching Kadee's CG PS-1 #7115 (CG 7000-7299 blt 4/52) I ran across some conflicting information...

Can anyone clarify for me what color the roof (and running board) should be for this car when it was new.
















Thanks to all who replied,

-John Hile


Re: PRR's X38 variants (UNCLASSIFIED)

Anthony Thompson <thompson@...>
 

Gatwood, Elden wrote:
The X38 was PRR's 50-foot version of the X37; built in the immediate pre-war and war years, as an "automobile" car . . . In fact, it was much more. Most X38's were found in dedicated service, with few actually in automobile service . . .
Elden, until the early 1950s AAR classified double-door box cars as "automobile cars," regardless of equipment and assignment

Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com
Publishers of books on railroad history


Re: Red Caboose X29

Kathe Robin <kathe@...>
 

Not that I could find on their web pages. LHS in some area may have them.

Max

-----Original Message-----
From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Aley, Jeff A
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:57 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [STMFC] Red Caboose X29

Max,

Are they not available from Red Caboose?

Regards,

-Jeff


From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
cheat_river_engineering
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:53 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [STMFC] Re: conductor's reefer data



Does anyone haveither a kit on an unpainted assembled model of the Red
Caboose "original" version of an X-29 boxcar they would be willing to sell
ortrade for? I'm in the market for at least 3 such cars.

Thanks,

Nax
=======================================================================email
: m_robin@cheatriver.com<mailto:m_robin%40cheatriver.com>

smail: Max S. Robin, PE
Cheat River Engineering Inc.
P. O. Box 289
23 Richwood Place
Denville, NJ 07834

voice: 973-945-5007(9:00am-11:00pm M-F,11:00am-11:00pm WE, Eastern)
=======================================================================







------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: PRR's X38 variants (UNCLASSIFIED)

Gatwood, Elden J SAD
 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Folks;

Since some of you were asking, I did some digging, on the PRR X38 variants.
I do not know the entire story, but it is an important car, widely seen in
auto parts and general service. You need this car. I hope someone is coming
out with it.

The X38 was PRR's 50-foot version of the X37; built in the immediate pre-war
and war years, as an "automobile" car. All came equipped with staggered
"7-foot" (actually wider, over a 14'6" door opening) doors and 10'7 IH.

In fact, it was much more. Most X38's were found in dedicated service, with
few actually in automobile service with floor tubes and tie-downs; many more
in auto parts service, with racks for miscellaneous parts, auto chassis (!),
auto side panels, auto roofs, and auto bodies. These went all over the
country to auto plants.

There were seven X38 equipped with veneer flooring for shipment of felt.

There were 582 (!) X38 with nailable steel floors in the doorway area. Many
of these were also rack cars.

X38A came with end doors.

I believe X38 (no sub-class) were in series 58101 to 58799 (700 cars), and
73700 to 76099 (2400 cars). X38A were in series 57800-58099 (300 cars) and
76100-76399 (300 cars).

The fixed ends were 5/5 Dreadnaught ends with a shortened top rib, plus a
"stepped" eave like the X37. Some cars in the 58xxx series came with 7-panel
Superior doors, and others with 7'+ "pre-war" Youngstown doors. Cars in
series 73700+ appear to have 3-plank wooden running boards, while cars in
series 58xxx have what appears to be Allen Wood steel running boards, but
this needs confirmation at the PRRT&HS archives. I suspect the wooden r/b
was a wartime restriction, but I want the correspondence. I also need to do
additional research on the roof issue. It appears that 58xxx series had
lap-seam roofs like the X37, but some of the 73xxx cars had seam caps on what
appears to be a rectangular panel roof. This may be where the confusion
comes in regarding what folks can or cannot model.

The X38 also came with a double-width side panel, of 2 double/3 double
configuration. This feature is why there has been no easy bashing of this
car, unless one were to start with 2 Sunshine X37's and go from there...

At some point, over 400 random cars in both series of X38 were rebuilt with
single 7' doors, as sub-class X38C, and sent right back into service as auto
parts cars. The filler was two equal width panels riveted to new posts.
They lost 100 cubic feet in capacity during the rebuild, and I have no idea
why.

The X38D was an XML, in series 605000-605349 (350 cars). The 600000 series
on the PRR was generally a segregated service series, so these cars need
additional research and photos to get to the "why". Dimensionally, they are
1 inch shorter inside, 2 inches narrower, 5 inch narrower at the eaves, and
pretty much the same elsewhere. They are also approx. 100 cubic feet less in
capacity than the X38.

The X38F were rebuilds of X38 (renumbered to series 45500 to 45672 - 173
cars), with cushioning.

The X38H (7 cars in series 46993 to 46999) were also rebuilds, but of X38A,
also with cushioning.

The X38L were rebuilds with cushioning, and also replacement of both doors
with a 10-foot plug door, and "Load Divider" (LD) equipped. Photos show
these with a deep fishbelly replacement side sill. I have yet to figure out
exactly how many were rebuilt.

These cars would make a perfect addition to the many cars we currently host
on our layouts.

Elden Gatwood






_

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE


Re: Red Caboose X29

Brian Carlson
 

Ted's Speedwitch set is very good.
Brian Carlson

--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Aley, Jeff A <Jeff.A.Aley@intel.com> wrote:


From: Aley, Jeff A <Jeff.A.Aley@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [STMFC] Red Caboose X29
To: "STMFC@yahoogroups.com" <STMFC@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 5:03 PM


 



Bruce (et. al.),

Please remind me: from whom should I buy HO decals for a patch-panelled X29? I would like to represent cars as they appeared in 1952.

Thanks,

-Jeff


Re: conductor's reefer data

Aley, Jeff A
 

Tony,

When was the "peak traffic"? My copy of the PFE book is (unfortunately) in storage.

Is it correct to assume that the peak to which you refer is the overall PFE peak, and not a "regional" peak? (I.e. one wouldn't see 80% PFE reefers coming out of Roseville while you had 100% PFE coming out of Tucson).

Thanks,

-Jeff


From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 9:34 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [STMFC] Re: conductor's reefer data



cliff prather wrote:
This was from the brief file in the case and I have not attempted to
check all the facts, such as, did BAR have any reefers at the end of
WWII or did they just lease cars. This does show as Tony stated, PFE
contracted with other reefer owners to supply cars. PFE in this
brief stated that they maintain a fleet of cars that could handled
only about 90% of the peak traffic demand.
My interview with Pete Holst included the statement that 90%
of the peak traffic was the BEST that PFE ever did. Other years it was
somewhat less. Of course, most of the year they could handle 100%.

Tony Thompson Editor, Signature Press, Berkeley, CA
2906 Forest Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705 www.signaturepress.com
(510) 540-6538; fax, (510) 540-1937; e-mail, thompson@signaturepress.com<mailto:thompson%40signaturepress.com>
Publishers of books on railroad history


Re: Red Caboose X29

Aley, Jeff A
 

Bruce (et. al.),

Please remind me: from whom should I buy HO decals for a patch-panelled X29? I would like to represent cars as they appeared in 1952.

Thanks,

-Jeff


From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Smith
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:59 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [STMFC] Red Caboose X29



Max,

In fact, the 1924 X29, both with and without patch panels, is
available from RC.
RC-7002
'HO' Undecorated X-29 '24 Steel Plate End Box Car
In Stock
US$ 19.95
RC-7005

'HO' Undecorated X-29 w/plate end, body side sill patch
In Stock
US$ 19.95

Regards
Bruce Smith
Auburn, AL

On Feb 22, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Aley, Jeff A wrote:

Max,

Are they not available from Red Caboose?

Regards,

-Jeff


From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com>] On
Behalf Of cheat_river_engineering
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:53 AM
To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com<mailto:STMFC%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [STMFC] Re: conductor's reefer data



Does anyone haveither a kit on an unpainted assembled model of the
Red Caboose "original" version of an X-29 boxcar they would be
willing to sell ortrade for? I'm in the market for at least 3 such
cars.

Thanks,

Nax
======================================================================
=email: m_robin@cheatriver.com<mailto:m_robin%40cheatriver.com><mailto:m_robin%40cheatriver.com>

smail: Max S. Robin, PE
Cheat River Engineering Inc.
P. O. Box 289
23 Richwood Place
Denville, NJ 07834

voice: 973-945-5007(9:00am-11:00pm M-F,11:00am-11:00pm WE, Eastern)
======================================================================
=







------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links



Re: PRR X32 D Question

Benjamin Hom
 

Dave Nelson wrote:
"I suppose the double door could change the location and/or size of the
cross-bearers and maybe something along the side sills too... but the center
sill itself would probably be the same for all these classes, don't you think?"

I agree.  The changes would likely be in crossbearer location, and a comparison
of these two builders photos shows an additional sidesill reinfocerment below
the doors of the Class X32B automobile car:
http://prr.railfan.net/freight/freightphotos.html?photo=BuildersPhotos/X32a_E12406_Side_BillLane.jpg&fr=clX32

http://prr.railfan.net/freight/freightphotos.html?photo=BuildersPhotos/X32b_E15370_Side_BillLane.jpg&fr=clX32



Ben Hom

89581 - 89600 of 187154