Re: New pix of Broadway NYC boxes
Richard Hendrickson
On Mar 20, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Gene wrote:
I seem to recall that BLI promised January 2011 delivery on theseGene, the latest information I have is that the NYC box cars will be here in late summer. Richard Hendrickson
|
|
Re: Tennessee Central
Mitchell Mercante
Rich,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Steve Johnson is probably your best bet. He monitors this list and may respond directly to you. He's involved with the Tennessee Central Museum. Regards, Mitch Mercante
--- On Sun, 3/20/11, Richard Yoder <oscale48@comcast.net> wrote:
From: Richard Yoder <oscale48@comcast.net> Subject: [STMFC] Tennessee Central To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, March 20, 2011, 4:57 PM I'm looking for someone that may have photos from the Tennessee Central railroad. If you know of someone please contact me. Sincerely, Rich Yoder ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: New pix of Broadway NYC boxes
Norman+Laraine Larkin <lono@...>
Hi, Gene. I found the date on their site, March 2011. The shop I do business with has also told me March, probably by the end of the month.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Norm Larkin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene" <bierglaeser@yahoo.com> To: <STMFC@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 5:25 PM Subject: [STMFC] Re: New pix of Broadway NYC boxes --- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@...> wrote:I seem to recall that BLI promised January 2011 delivery on these cars. Has that actually happened? Is more up-to-date information available?
|
|
Re: Ry Age
Would anyone by any chance have the index to Railway Age in 1946? If so
please contact me off line Thanks Tom, Bartlesville --
|
|
Tennessee Central
I'm looking for someone that may have photos from the Tennessee Central
railroad. If you know of someone please contact me. Sincerely, Rich Yoder
|
|
Re: OT cars & trucks
Gene <bierglaeser@...>
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "timken2626" <timken2626@...> wrote:
Greg's Garage used to make resin vehicles going back into the 30s. They started out unpainted at a very reasonable price. Then they started prepainting them, and the price went up. I just did a search, and turned up a few individual vehicles, but did not find a manufacturer's web site, and they don't show up in the 2011 Walthers catalog, so I don't know what has become of the line.I find them on eBay with some regularity. With a little fussing they can be fair models but still not foreground quality in my opinion. Someone mentioned Williams Bros. Are they shipping again? Gene Green
|
|
Re: New pix of Broadway NYC boxes
Gene <bierglaeser@...>
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@...> wrote:
I seem to recall that BLI promised January 2011 delivery on these cars. Has that actually happened? Is more up-to-date information available? I couldn't find anything on the BLI website. Gene Green
|
|
Re: Sunshine instructions
I have kit 64.35 a X-26C do you think they are the same? Let me know and I
can scan and send. Fenton On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Des Norman <desanorman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
-- Fenton Wells 3047 Creek Run Sanford NC 27332 919-499-5545 srrfan1401@gmail.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: MCB or ARA Stencil Drawings
Charlie Vlk
Tom-
Thanks for looking! Charlie Charlie I returned home today after getting into Kansas City on No. 4 and driving to Bartlesville. My "Standards" is newer than I thiught, 1975. But it had no lettering fints in it. Sorry Tom
|
|
Sunshine instructions
Des Norman
Hello all,
I recently bought 2nd-hand an unstarted Sunshine kit. It's kit #64.21 for a PRR X26C. Unfortunately there are no instruction sheets included. Would anyone have a set of instructions which they could scan and email, please? It would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Des Norman
|
|
Re: May 8, 1937 Railway Age
Somehow I knew you would have them but it never hurts to offer. Look
forward to meeting you in Savannah. Fenton On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:24 PM, lnbill <fgexbill@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
-- Fenton Wells 3047 Creek Run Sanford NC 27332 919-499-5545 srrfan1401@gmail.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Re: OT cars & trucks
Larry Wolohon
Greg's garage was from Saginaw, MI. I believe that roughly a year or 2 ago, he decided to go out of business for reason(s) unknown to me. I think that he sold mostly locally(in the SE Michigan area), as I would usually see him @ the Ann Arbor Train Show, the Gratiot Valley Train Shows & the Redford Model RR Club shows in for the past 10 or 15 years. I didn't know that he was in the Walther's Catalogs, at least there are no listing of Greg's Garage in my 2005 or 2007 Walthers catalogs.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I always thought that he did a pretty decent job for a fairly decent price, $5.00/ a model which was painted. He also did some 4 door cars & some not so common autos. Larry Wolohon
----- Original Message -----
From: "timken2626" <timken2626@comcast.net> To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 12:56:13 PM Subject: [STMFC] Re: OT cars & trucks Richard Bale wrote: Greg's Garage used to make resin vehicles going back into the 30s. They started out unpainted at a very reasonable price. Then they started prepainting them, and the price went up. I just did a search, and turned up a few individual vehicles, but did not find a manufacturer's web site, and they don't show up in the 2011 Walthers catalog, so I don't know what has become of the line. Chuck Soule
|
|
Re: May 8, 1937 Railway Age
Bill Welch
Thank you Fenton. I am pretty sure I have these. I also have detailed photos of the two decking systems installed by FGE and drawings for them too. I am hoping the citation I am looking for may have some text about the system, hopefully quoting FGE's Mechanical Dept. I am also curious to know which group of decked cars the article is about as this may help me put a date to when the steel sheathed decked cars were built.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Bill Welch
--- In STMFC@yahoogroups.com, O Fenton Wells <srrfan1401@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: May 8, 1937 Railway Age
I have 2 Howard Ameling photos of such a cars. Car No.9392, reweigh date
Jax 8-56 and No. 9235 with rewigh dates of Jax 3-54. If you need them. Fenton On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Bill Welch <fgexbill@tampabay.rr.com>wrote:
-- Fenton Wells 3047 Creek Run Sanford NC 27332 919-499-5545 srrfan1401@gmail.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
May 8, 1937 Railway Age
Bill Welch
The bibliography of the 1943 Car Builder's Cyclopedia says that on
page 791 of the May 8, 1937 issue of "Railway Age" there is an article about the Double Deck Refrigerator Cars owned by Fruit Growers Express. Before I try to find this issue in a library somewhere, I wanted to see if someone on the this list owns this issue. If so, could you please contact me offline. Bill Welch 2225 Nursery Road; #20-104 Clearwater, FL 33764-7622 727.470.9930 fgexbill@tampabay.rr.com
|
|
Re: "MACHINERY LOADS FOR GONS" ARTICLE
Paul <buygone@...>
Bill:
In going through all of my AAR Rules books covering the "Loading of Commodities On Open Top Cars" I find no mention of the covering or tarping of the load. The rules are very specific as to how the load was to be secured to the car. I would assume that after inspection by the "Railroad Loading Inspector" the shipper could cover the load with tarps any way they wanted to protect their product from the weather. One would assume that to insure that the tarp stayed in place for the entire trip they were well secured to the car. Paul C. Koehler _____ From: STMFC@yahoogroups.com [mailto:STMFC@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of WILLIAM PARDIE Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 11:27 AM To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Subject: [STMFC] "MACHINERY LOADS FOR GONS" ARTICLE I have a question prompted by Clark Propst excellent article on machinery loads in the current RMC. As I would like to incorporate this technique for flat cars I would like to know how the tarps were secured. Probably tacked to the deck, cinched by rope or a combination of both. Just want to be sure before I start. Thaks in advance. Bill Pardie
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS
Kurt Laughlin <fleeta@...>
That's true: There's no legal limitation on signing a ridiculous contract.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I wonder why these "cash cow" farmers don't realize that things aren't worth what you think they are, rather only what someone is willing to pay for them. They don't seem to be making much money sitting in a file cabinet. KL
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Smith To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 2:16 PM Subject: Re: [STMFC] Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS Kurt, I would remind you that if you do not control the copyright on something, then the way to "control" it is by restricting access. Thus, if the NYCHS decides that they wish to control access to a drawing that they own, but for which they do not hold the copyright, they are well within their rights to require that anyone aquiring copies from them sign an agreement that requires the purchaser to do whatever NYCHS dictates in order to gain access, including paying royalties on subsequent models. The requirements detailed by Denis indicate that someone or a group at the NYCSHS think that somehow the NYCSHS' resources are a "cash cow" that should be milked. OTOH, the PRRT&HS and the PRRT&HS Modeling Committee strive to assist manufacturers to identify exactly those drawings that might be needed for a given project and the PRRT&HS even offers a manufacturers membership which provides discounted rates on access to drawings in the society's collection. No royalty agreements are asked for and no royalties are paid. Although the PRRT&HS does not request them, model are sometimes provided by manufacturers to the PRRT&HS which then raffles them at the annual meeting. This is not a "red team" versus "green team" thing, as the PRRT&HS was in the same situation as the NYCSHS 15-20 years ago, when modelers felt decidedly unwelcome by the "powers that be". However, some members, mostly younger modelers, stuck it out and gradually changed the focus of the PRRT&HS to included modelers (in addition to employees and historians) and the society is definitely the better for it. Hopefully the NYCSHS can continue to make progress in a similar direction. Regards Bruce Smith Auburn, AL >>> "Kurt Laughlin" <fleeta@verizon.net> 03/19/11 9:17 PM >>> It's more a matter of what "they" are missisng: an understanding of intelectual property laws, particularly with regard to copyrights. Not uncommon, unfortunately. In the military vehicle world there are several libraries claiming copyright to photographs that have the US Army Signal Corps emblem in the corner! (Government photographs are "born" in the public domain. It's not that the Government claims copyright and lets us use it free, it's that they are not protectable at all.) KL ----- Original Message ----- From: pullmanboss I work with the Newberry Library and am very familiar with their fee structure and terms of use. I have redrawn a multitude of floor plan, underneath equipment and side elevation drawings from Pullman originals in the Newberry files and am not in violation of the Newberry's terms of use when those (re)drawings show up in kit instructions. What am I missing when it comes to the NYCHS? ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
"MACHINERY LOADS FOR GONS" ARTICLE
WILLIAM PARDIE
I have a question prompted by Clark Propst excellent article on machinery loads in the current
RMC. As I would like to incorporate this technique for flat cars I would like to know how the tarps were secured. Probably tacked to the deck, cinched by rope or a combination of both. Just want to be sure before I start. Thaks in advance. Bill Pardie
|
|
Re: Foreign Road Stock Cars (was Re: Pacemaker boxcar usageoff-line of NYC)
Folks,
Just a quick note on this subject to clarify. The original question from Dave Evans was regarding WWII era stock trains. Most of the trains cited below are post WWII, as are their schedules. Even the "Man O'war cited by Dave is post WWII, iirc. Regards Bruce Smith Auburn, AL Greg,<SUVCWORR@aol.com> 03/19/11 6:21 PM >>> According to 1952 freight car schedules, PRR was running the following east bound livestock trains: SW-8 rest and water at Columbus no stop Herr's Island PH-10 lives stock block terminated Herr's Island VL-6 live stock block terminated Herr's Island NW-86 rest water feed Columbus no work Herr's Island NW-88 rest water feed Columbus no work Herr's Island WS-8 block 2 live stock terminate Herr's Island block 3 continue to Enola without rest etc FW-8 drop block at Herr;s Island pick-up rested live stock from VL-6, PH-10, WS-8, PH-29 and previous day FW-8. Looks like the only live stock train beyond Herr's Island that worked Herr's Island was FW-8 So if wheel reports or consists of FW-8 can be located your question should be answered. SW-8, NW-86, NW-88 would need to show consists from Columbus. I don't know what PH-29 is. It is not in the freight schedule and should be an west bound or south bound train. Rich Orr -----Original Message----- From: tgregmrtn@aol.com To: STMFC@yahoogroups.com Sent: Fri, Mar 18, 2011 8:38 pm Subject: Re: [STMFC] Foreign Road Stock Cars (was Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC) Dave wrote: "Greg, I do not want to re-open the entire fleet balance debate, but I have not yet esearched what a viable mix of stock cars would be on a PRR stock train (e.g. an-of-war) in central Pennsylvania (after resting the east bound animals at err Island in Pittsburgh). I guess the generic question is, once a stock car is loaded with stock that is estined for a specific location, could that car be replaced when the stock was emoved for rest/feeding/car cleaning at an intermediate location, or would the ar and its stock go all the way to the destination? I would think this would govern whether western road stock cars make it east of err Island. I need to start identifying what models to buy. Are there any era dependencies? I am modeling WWII. Thanks, ave Evans" did a little research on the rail miles (current no era specific) and it shows hat CHGO to Newark, NJ (not exactly the slaughter houses) show to be 898 miles Greenville Docks, NJ is the same). If I do the math using 21 miles per hour as he rule (stock would/should move faster than manifest freight) then it would ake approximately 43 hours to make the move and would be outside the AAR rules nd thus the stock would have to be rested and feed at Herr Island, PA Pittsburgh, PA). But AAR records show during the WW2 era that train speeds were igher than in most other eras. I believe when it comes to Herr Island you have o think in terms of first in first out... ut in my era of the mid 50s photo evidence shows that (dare I say this) most ars returning west (great shots crossing the Rockville Bridge) were of western rigin, not all just most. One need only search the pages of the Don Ball books s well as the Don Wood's book to see that there was less than one would expect f home road cars. I have found good evidence that the UP cars held down a remendous amount of the business (related to car supply) and an abnormally low mount of PRR cars show up. I was inspired to do my Shake N Take UP S-40-10 car n DLS paint based on a photo in Don Wood's book taken on the Middle Div. railing an L&N Mathers stock car, trailing a PRR Mountain headed west. Then in he late fifties as the PRR began to take the stock business more seriously and ith the rebuilding program to the K9 and K11 program the worm turns so to say. e (SPF's) all realize that this business supported the fledgling Truc/Trailer rain program. In my stock car fleet it i s doubtful that I will even bother to represent a PRR car in my empty/loaded ar fleet. I have never done more than photo research and would love to see the accounting ecords during the transition era to see exactly where the PRR K class cars erived there per diem as they just don't really show up in on line photos other han parked... go figure.and the then compare the off line cars accounting chedules. Greg Martin Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links Individual Email | Traditional http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Re: Pacemaker boxcar usage off-line of NYC - NYCSHS
Kurt,
I would remind you that if you do not control the copyright on something, then the way to "control" it is by restricting access. Thus, if the NYCHS decides that they wish to control access to a drawing that they own, but for which they do not hold the copyright, they are well within their rights to require that anyone aquiring copies from them sign an agreement that requires the purchaser to do whatever NYCHS dictates in order to gain access, including paying royalties on subsequent models. The requirements detailed by Denis indicate that someone or a group at the NYCSHS think that somehow the NYCSHS' resources are a "cash cow" that should be milked. OTOH, the PRRT&HS and the PRRT&HS Modeling Committee strive to assist manufacturers to identify exactly those drawings that might be needed for a given project and the PRRT&HS even offers a manufacturers membership which provides discounted rates on access to drawings in the society's collection. No royalty agreements are asked for and no royalties are paid. Although the PRRT&HS does not request them, model are sometimes provided by manufacturers to the PRRT&HS which then raffles them at the annual meeting. This is not a "red team" versus "green team" thing, as the PRRT&HS was in the same situation as the NYCSHS 15-20 years ago, when modelers felt decidedly unwelcome by the "powers that be". However, some members, mostly younger modelers, stuck it out and gradually changed the focus of the PRRT&HS to included modelers (in addition to employees and historians) and the society is definitely the better for it. Hopefully the NYCSHS can continue to make progress in a similar direction. Regards Bruce Smith Auburn, AL It's more a matter of what "they" are missisng: an understanding of"Kurt Laughlin" <fleeta@verizon.net> 03/19/11 9:17 PM >>> intelectual property laws, particularly with regard to copyrights. Not uncommon, unfortunately. In the military vehicle world there are several libraries claiming copyright to photographs that have the US Army Signal Corps emblem in the corner! (Government photographs are "born" in the public domain. It's not that the Government claims copyright and lets us use it free, it's that they are not protectable at all.) KL ----- Original Message ----- From: pullmanboss I work with the Newberry Library and am very familiar with their fee structure and terms of use. I have redrawn a multitude of floor plan, underneath equipment and side elevation drawings from Pullman originals in the Newberry files and am not in violation of the Newberry's terms of use when those (re)drawings show up in kit instructions. What am I missing when it comes to the NYCHS? ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|