|
Re: Dennis Storzek's Kits
Thanks again for the kind words, but I'm surprised that no one remembers WHY they "fall together"... Mine were some of the few resin kits that had alignment ledges, for want of a better term, on the
Thanks again for the kind words, but I'm surprised that no one remembers WHY they "fall together"... Mine were some of the few resin kits that had alignment ledges, for want of a better term, on the
|
By
soolinehistory <destorzek@...>
·
#103269
·
|
|
Re: SHPX 13141 help
Peter,
Unless the car was renumbered at some point (unlikely), SHPX 13141 was
a 10,000-gallon ICC-103 insulated Type 27 car built in 1940. It was one
of 53 cars in ACF lot 2141A, series SHPX
Peter,
Unless the car was renumbered at some point (unlikely), SHPX 13141 was
a 10,000-gallon ICC-103 insulated Type 27 car built in 1940. It was one
of 53 cars in ACF lot 2141A, series SHPX
|
By
Ed Hawkins
·
#103268
·
|
|
SHPX 13141 help
Although the photo I am referencing is from 1966 I don't *think* my
question is beyond the scope of the group because I am postive the car
was in service long before 1960, just not sure if it was in
Although the photo I am referencing is from 1966 I don't *think* my
question is beyond the scope of the group because I am postive the car
was in service long before 1960, just not sure if it was in
|
By
Peter Ness
·
#103267
·
|
|
Re: Today's Validation of P.T. Barnum
I believe the New york and Northern was a little known subsidiary of the New Haven. Their entire fleet of rolling stock consisted of 2 boxcars (or is it box cars) that ran between two on line
I believe the New york and Northern was a little known subsidiary of the New Haven. Their entire fleet of rolling stock consisted of 2 boxcars (or is it box cars) that ran between two on line
|
By
Mike Fleming
·
#103266
·
|
|
Re: Today's Validation of P.T. Barnum
Unfortunately the jurisdiction of the Prototype Police ends at the borders of Ebay.
Tim O'
Unfortunately the jurisdiction of the Prototype Police ends at the borders of Ebay.
Tim O'
|
By
Tim O'Connor
·
#103265
·
|
|
Re: Dennis Storzek's Kits
Jim is completely correct. Dennis' kits more or less fall together because they are well thought through and engineered to fit well and just as important, easily together. The "easily" is hard to
Jim is completely correct. Dennis' kits more or less fall together because they are well thought through and engineered to fit well and just as important, easily together. The "easily" is hard to
|
By
Bill Welch
·
#103264
·
|
|
Re: Dennis Storzek's Kits
In fairness it's both.
I've had my hands on many of those kits and have never had an issue with a flawed casting. And I maintain that those masters remain to this day some of the best ever
In fairness it's both.
I've had my hands on many of those kits and have never had an issue with a flawed casting. And I maintain that those masters remain to this day some of the best ever
|
By
Pierre <pierre.oliver@...>
·
#103263
·
|
|
Re: Dennis Storzek's Kits
It's not the casting. It's the very high quality of the masters.
Jim Hayes
Portland Oregon
www.sunshinekits.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
It's not the casting. It's the very high quality of the masters.
Jim Hayes
Portland Oregon
www.sunshinekits.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
By
Jim Hayes
·
#103262
·
|
|
Re: Dennis Storzek's Kits
I'm soon entering a casting phase and would love to know what makes Dennis's kits special. Those are lessons I'd love to learn about. Dennis?
Thanks much,
Brian Chapman
Evansdale, Iowa
I'm soon entering a casting phase and would love to know what makes Dennis's kits special. Those are lessons I'd love to learn about. Dennis?
Thanks much,
Brian Chapman
Evansdale, Iowa
|
By
Brian <cornbeltroute@...>
·
#103261
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
The CGW cars were bought from Pullman and have Pullman ends. Sometimes referred to as PS-0 ends.
Clark Propst
The CGW cars were bought from Pullman and have Pullman ends. Sometimes referred to as PS-0 ends.
Clark Propst
|
By
Clark Propst
·
#103260
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
It was the design that was modified, not any existing cars.
Dave Nelson
It was the design that was modified, not any existing cars.
Dave Nelson
|
By
Dave Nelson
·
#103259
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
thanks scott, that does sound a more logical explanation. regards, benjamin
thanks scott, that does sound a more logical explanation. regards, benjamin
|
By
Benjamin Scanlon
·
#103258
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
thank you for the info and clarification, ben. handy to know.
benjamin
thank you for the info and clarification, ben. handy to know.
benjamin
|
By
Benjamin Scanlon
·
#103257
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
hi clark,
thank you. i was enjoying several online photos of your models of the louie last night. i did notice that they (and the CGW) were represented in the buyers of the original 1937 design but
hi clark,
thank you. i was enjoying several online photos of your models of the louie last night. i did notice that they (and the CGW) were represented in the buyers of the original 1937 design but
|
By
Benjamin Scanlon
·
#103256
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
The granger roads served "the wide open spaces" where there were few tunnels or tight overhead highway bridge clearances. But the bigger cars were more useful for general merchandise, which could
The granger roads served "the wide open spaces" where there were few tunnels or tight overhead highway bridge clearances. But the bigger cars were more useful for general merchandise, which could
|
By
Scott Pitzer
·
#103255
·
|
|
1950 ORER Spreadsheet
I downloaded the spreadsheet to look for CB&Q models and noted an error for
XM-32 box car numbers. The spreadsheet lists 130250-134250, but the
130251-134250 series was for XM-21/22/23 box cars. XM-32
I downloaded the spreadsheet to look for CB&Q models and noted an error for
XM-32 box car numbers. The spreadsheet lists 130250-134250, but the
130251-134250 series was for XM-21/22/23 box cars. XM-32
|
By
Nelson Moyer <ku0a@...>
·
#103254
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
Ben, The M&StL continued to buy 10' IH cars, because the weight of the grain would 'fill' the car before reaching the roof. There were lines stenciled on the car's inside walls showing how full to
Ben, The M&StL continued to buy 10' IH cars, because the weight of the grain would 'fill' the car before reaching the roof. There were lines stenciled on the car's inside walls showing how full to
|
By
Clark Propst
·
#103253
·
|
|
Re: Modeling techniques - Resin casting - suggestions for reading
For some reading, join the scratchbuilding group.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Scratch-building/
I have posted a detailed description of how I make castings in the files section. It is a bit
For some reading, join the scratchbuilding group.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Scratch-building/
I have posted a detailed description of how I make castings in the files section. It is a bit
|
By
hacketet <hacketet@...>
·
#103252
·
|
|
Re: modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
Ben Scanlon asked:
"Was there much external, visible difference between an AAR 1937 steel boxcar
and
a modified AAR 1937 boxcar?"
and
"Where was the extra height added? Throughout the side, or was
Ben Scanlon asked:
"Was there much external, visible difference between an AAR 1937 steel boxcar
and
a modified AAR 1937 boxcar?"
and
"Where was the extra height added? Throughout the side, or was
|
By
Benjamin Hom
·
#103251
·
|
|
modified AAR 1937 height difference to AAR 1937 steel boxcar
A question that has probably been asked before, and more competently than I will. But I'm kind of new to appreciating differences in US stock.
Was there much external, visible difference between an
A question that has probably been asked before, and more competently than I will. But I'm kind of new to appreciating differences in US stock.
Was there much external, visible difference between an
|
By
Benjamin Scanlon
·
#103250
·
|